Skip to comments.
BRUCE ALMIGHTY: Atheism's Critique of Arminianism
Posted on 11/30/2003 5:21:17 PM PST by drstevej
Bruce Nolan (Carrey), a television reporter in Buffalo, N.Y.,is discontented with almost everything in life despite his popularity and the love of his girlfriend, Grace (Aniston) . At the end of the worst day of his life, Bruce angrily ridicules and rages against God and God responds. God appears in human form (Freeman) and, endowing Bruce with divine powers, challenges Bruce to take on the big job to see if he can do it any better. |
|
Bruce Nolan: How do you make someone love you without changing free will?
God: Welcome to my world.
TOPICS: General Discusssion
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 441-455 next last
Bruce Almighty is an insightful lampoon on a God who "can't mess with free will."
1
posted on
11/30/2003 5:21:17 PM PST
by
drstevej
To: drstevej
I guess I'm going to have to rent the movie now.
2
posted on
11/30/2003 5:28:33 PM PST
by
Wrigley
To: Wrigley
"You Got the Power!"
3
posted on
11/30/2003 5:36:28 PM PST
by
drstevej
To: drstevej
Bruce Almighty is an insightful lampoon on a God who "can't mess with free will." ~ drstevej
Apart from the fact that it is obvious that the Atheists think the Arminian god is a doofus (remember all the interesting comments I get from Atheists when I delcare to them the Biblical Calvinist's image of God), I have a question to wring the non-Calvinist's noodle in knots:
- Is God not smart enough figure out how to have His desire for all to freely come to Him?
--- OR ---
- Is God not powerful enough to bring about His desire for all to freely come to Him?
The amusing thing here is that I can freely grant to you pretty much whatever you want, ask these questions and you are theologically checkmated because you cannot answer them without blasphemying God. And I do find that terribly amusing.
As a Calvinist, I firmly believe that God is both powerful enough and smart enough to bring about any desire that He has, which makes Him much more interesting than the bumbling incompetent Arminian version.
- I firmly believe that whatever His soul desires, that He does.
- I firmly believe that He does according to His will among the inhabitants of the earth.
- I firmly believe that He does whatever He pleases.
Woody.
4
posted on
11/30/2003 5:52:40 PM PST
by
CCWoody
(Recognize that all true Christians will be Calvinists in glory,...)
To: drstevej
Have you seen this movie?
I had not, because I had assumed based upon the previews that the movie was blasphemous. But what I heard from a friend is that it actually raises a good point: do you really think you can do a better job than the Almighty?
I might have to rent it after all.
5
posted on
11/30/2003 6:03:04 PM PST
by
jude24
To: jude24
***Have you seen this movie? ***
Saw it this weekend. "Almighty" is a bit of overstatement in the movie's concept of God. The God in the movie has a strict rule against messing with free will. As a result He is quite frustrated and settles for the best He can do.
There is the typical crudities and general blasphemies you would expect when Jim Carey is God. But the "free will" angle is fascinating. It really illustrates what Calvinists have been telling Arminians here for many moons.
I am so thankful God messed with my heart and gave me the will to love Him.
6
posted on
11/30/2003 6:15:26 PM PST
by
drstevej
To: P-Marlowe; xzins
PING
7
posted on
11/30/2003 7:06:21 PM PST
by
drstevej
To: drstevej
I don't think there is anything on earth that could make me want to see this movie. I am afraid lightening will strike me! :-)
8
posted on
11/30/2003 8:06:48 PM PST
by
ladyinred
(The Left have blood on their hands!)
To: ladyinred
I understand.
9
posted on
11/30/2003 8:11:23 PM PST
by
drstevej
To: drstevej; P-Marlowe
Hollywood, huh?
There's an acceptable broker..../sarcasm.
10
posted on
11/30/2003 8:18:42 PM PST
by
xzins
(Proud to be Army!)
To: CCWoody
One of these days I'll bet we'll get to heaven to find out that neither the Calvinists nor the Arminian's have it figured out. We'll all have a good laugh about the whole thing (with perhaps some mourning that perhaps our infighting drove away some souls), and then we'll promptly set it a side to get down to the business of enjoying our eternal home and worshipping its landlord.
11
posted on
11/30/2003 8:56:05 PM PST
by
mcg1969
To: mcg1969
As a Calvinist, I cannot drive anyone away. Nor can I bring anyone to Christ.
That my friend, is very refreshing.
12
posted on
12/01/2003 6:15:30 AM PST
by
Gamecock
To: Gamecock
Your logic is flawed. You say, "As a Calvinist, I cannot drive anyone away." (As if I could, just because I'm not.) If Calvinism is false, then the fact that
you're a Calvinist matters naught. So the proper way to say it is, "If Calvinism is true, I cannot drive anyone away."
And that brings me to the point: are you really that sure that Calvinism is 100% correct? Any doctrine constructed by humans is likely to be flawed somehow. I know, I know, you say it wasn't constructed by humans, it was constructed by God. But we humans had to discover the doctrine from Scripture. And we see through the glass darkly, my friend.
It seems therefore worthwhile to live out the Great Commission under the assumption that we do not fully understand the nature of free will, predestination, and election.
13
posted on
12/01/2003 8:24:54 AM PST
by
mcg1969
To: mcg1969
Paul teaches Calvinism, so does Christ, John, as a matter of fact, the totality of scripture teaches Calvinism.
I believe scripture.
Do you have a problem with the inerrancy of scripture? If you have an issue with scripture, you have a bigger problem than you lack of understanding of Calvinism.
If you don't have a problem with inerrancy, why not reread the Bible from front to back and we'll meet back here and discuss it. I'll give you a year.
14
posted on
12/01/2003 8:32:20 AM PST
by
Gamecock
(Paul was a Calvinist)
To: mcg1969
But we humans had to discover the doctrine from Scripture. And we see through the glass darkly, my friend. Oh, BTW: Titus 1:9 He must hold firmly to the trustworthy message as it has been taught, so that he can encourage others by sound doctrine and refute those who oppose it.
You are opposing sound doctrine my friend.
15
posted on
12/01/2003 8:36:00 AM PST
by
Gamecock
(Paul was a Calvinist)
To: CCWoody
The amusing thing here is that I can freely grant to you pretty much whatever you want, ask these questions and you are theologically checkmated because you cannot answer them without blasphemying God.Yawn.
You have, by couching the question in such a manner, intellectually checkmated yourself, because to introduce 'blasphemy' into the equation is assuming a predetermined set of conditions already exist, thus assuring from the beginning that all contentions are, by default, skewed in favor of one outcome.
And I do find that terribly amusing.
What's amusing is that you aren't even aware of what you did.
16
posted on
12/01/2003 9:25:41 AM PST
by
Pahuanui
(When a foolish man hears of the Tao, he laughs out loud)
To: mcg1969
Your reply to Gamecock:
And that brings me to the point: are you really that sure that Calvinism is 100% correct? Any doctrine constructed by humans is likely to be flawed somehow. I know, I know, you say it wasn't constructed by humans, it was constructed by God. But we humans had to discover the doctrine from Scripture. And we see through the glass darkly, my friend. You might find it interesting that the FR Calvinist swarm claims that Calvinism encompasses a range of differing beliefs and is not a monolithic set of doctrinal precepts.
You will also note that the swarm equates Calvinism, at least as they individually perceive it, with the Gospel message of the Bible; even to the point of claiming that Calvinism is the Gospel.
Some of the swarm are so arrogant as to claim that even the Calvinist Charles Spurgeon was wrong about predestination.
To: Gamecock
Oh please, your arrogance is amusing.
Plenty of people more knowledgeable than either of us disagree on the question of Calvinism, and you know it. People who study Scripture with fervor, intelligence, care, Spirit, and faith, with a firm belief in inerrancy, come to a variety of conclusions about many issues in Scripture. They recognize the apparent (but not actual) contradictions free will, predestination, and election; and they them in a variety of ways. Calvinism is just one such way. (Well, of course, it's not just "one" such way, because even Calvinists disagree on the details.)
You know this all quite well, I'm sure. That you would speak as if you don't is disingenuous.
18
posted on
12/01/2003 10:21:19 AM PST
by
mcg1969
To: mcg1969
Please forgive my typo, corrected here:
They recognize the apparent (but not actual) contradictions in the area of free will, predestination, and election; and they resolve them in a variety of ways.
19
posted on
12/01/2003 10:23:01 AM PST
by
mcg1969
To: connectthedots
Thanks for the info. I'm somewhat new here as you probably know so I'm still learning about the various cliques here.
20
posted on
12/01/2003 10:24:01 AM PST
by
mcg1969
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 441-455 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson