[Pahuanui]

The amusing thing here is that I can freely grant to you pretty much whatever you want, ask these questions and you are theologically checkmated because you cannot answer them without blasphemying God.

Yawn.

You have, by couching the question in such a manner, intellectually checkmated yourself, because to introduce 'blasphemy' into the equation is assuming a predetermined set of conditions already exist, thus assuring from the beginning that all contentions are, by default, skewed in favor of one outcome.

And I do find that terribly amusing.

What's amusing is that you aren't even aware of what you did.

[CCWoody]

Yawn.

You have, by couching the question in such a manner, intellectually checkmated yourself, because to introduce 'blasphemy' into the equation is assuming a predetermined set of conditions already exist, thus assuring from the beginning that all contentions are, by default, skewed in favor of one outcome. ~ Pahuanui

Yawn!

Did you know than not a single non-Calvinist has been able to answer the quesions. Why, because they know that their god is unable to have his desire and so they strut like a rooster for a moment and then head off stage.

So, my questions stand and all the world knows that the questions remain unanswered or even unchallenged in any meaningful way. One tried once. He babbled on about Prevenient grace, but was unable to tell me how His god can't factor in free will in his pathetic desire to save all.

Good day and thanks for not answering...

Woody.