Skip to comments.CATHOLIC LITURGY - Follow Up On -"Are Extraordinary Ministers the Norm?"
Posted on 10/29/2003 7:21:36 AM PST by NYer
Follow-up: Extraordinary Ministers
To judge by the large amount of correspondence, it seems that our reply regarding the use of extraordinary ministers has touched a nerve (see Oct. 14). Many of the messages received serve to confirm that many Catholics perceive a widespread overuse of extraordinary ministers. Some follow-up questions, however, allow me to expand on my original reply although it is impossible for me to respond to all of the queries.
As stated before, priests and deacons, unless physically impaired, should not sit down and omit administering holy Communion. They may be assisted, but not substituted, by other ministers.
These extraordinary ministers, according to GIRM 162, "should not approach the altar before the priest has received Communion, and they are always to receive from the hands of the priest celebrant the vessel containing either species of the Most Holy Eucharist for distribution to the faithful." The deacon also receives Communion after the priest and from his hands.
A reader from Rome asked if an instituted acolyte were not also an ordinary minister. Properly speaking he is not, but he does have precedence, in the sense that, should an extraordinary minister be required, he should be called upon first before anybody else. Also, in the absence of the deacon, the acolyte may purify the sacred vessels, something that is not permitted to other extraordinary ministers (although the United States has received an indult allowing them to assist in the purification in cases of necessity).
After the instituted acolyte, the usual order of preference for designating extraordinary ministers is to first choose an instituted lector, a seminarian, a religious brother, a nun, a catechist and a lay person of either sex (see instruction "Immensae Caritatis").
An American correspondent asked who has the authority to designate extraordinary ministers and what intellectual and moral traits are required of them. In special cases (for example, a sudden illness of the scheduled minister) the celebrant may designate a known member of the faithful for that precise celebration.
In normal circumstances, the question of extraordinary eucharistic ministers falls under the supervision of the bishop who establishes the conditions, and grants the authority, for admission. This is usually done through the parish priest or religious superior. In Rome, for example, besides being proposed by the pastor the candidate has to attend a specific course lasting several months to a year before being allowed to serve.
This is related to an English correspondent's inquiry regarding uniformity of movement. Extraordinary eucharistic ministers should be properly trained in the rubrics, and the pastor should assure that all of them adhere to the same procedures with respect to movements, purification of the hands, etc., in accordance with the general norms and the particular structure of the Church building.
Morally speaking, while not necessarily a candidate for beatification, the eucharistic minister should be a devout Catholic in good standing. As stated in the instruction "Immensae Caritatis," the choice of an extraordinary minister "should never fall upon a person whose designation could cause astonishment to the faithful." A person who does not fully adhere to, and strive to live by, Catholic teaching either in doctrine or morals should not undertake nor be admitted to this ministry. Likewise, if one is unable to receive Communion because of some momentary fall, one should first seek the sacrament of reconciliation before exercising the ministry.
Rather than seeing this as being somehow cast out from the fold, separating oneself from this ministry, if one's life and belief lack conformity with the Catholic faith, is a sincere act of respect toward Christ in the Eucharist and the other members of the faithful. More grace and strength will come from refraining in this field than from perhaps living the lie of being a public witness to a faith not fully one's own.
Several readers asked what to do if they believed that there were too many extraordinary ministers, some even suggesting that they should refrain from receiving Communion. As we explained in the earlier column, there may be good reasons for using them which are not immediately apparent, so one should always be willing to give the pastor the benefit of the doubt. One could approach the pastor and politely ask him to clear up whatever doubts one might have. In grave cases of abuse one may inform the bishop.
Even if one has serious doubts regarding the propriety of using extraordinary ministers in a given case, the gift of Communion is a greater good and should never be refused. In a very real sense we always receive Communion from unworthy hands no matter how holy the minister, for nobody is ever fully worthy to touch Christ's sacred body.
Finally, a semantic note, in some places the extraordinary minister is referred to as a "special minister." "Special" may not be the most literal translation although the word is sometimes used in this sense, as in "special representative," but in the end it matters little whether they are called "extraordinary," "special," "supplementary," or any other denomination as this does not change one whit the canonical norms regarding their use.
Readers may send questions to firstname.lastname@example.org. Please put the word "Liturgy" in the subject field. The text should include your initials, your city and your state, province or country.
(thanks, Nick, for the original posting!)
Catholic Ping - let me know if you want on/off this list
One of the things that bothers me and which is left out of the GIRM is the part where a disabled priest may sit out Communion and have EEMs act in his stead. I can understand this as a disabled "visiting" priest does say a Mass twice a month at our parish. He is unsteady on his feet and most parishioners hold their breath during the parts of the Mass where he walks or stands for any length of time. He sits out Communion and EEMs stand in for him. We have a regular pastor and a retired priest living next door to the parish in the rectory. Although both of them are around before and after Mass to say "hi" to the parishioners, neither one comes over for Communion distribution (as they used to do before EEMs became the "norm" in the 70s and 80s).
I dunno. We are getting inserts in our parish bulletins which are explaining "unity" and "community" and "body/common posture" and later inserts will give "details of the times of standing, sitting and kneeling" and my eyes are starting to glaze over (and over, and over, and over). I doubt anything about EEMs will be addressed as this is a hot potato subject. Like altarboy girls.
And do the translation before the end of the world already!
I don't know about you, but I can think of quite a lot of EM's that do not fit the above description. I know of one in particular who is divorced and remarried outside of the Church and was allowed to become a Eucharistic Minister!!!
My personal feelings is that there are way too many of them. I have never and will never receive Our Lord from one of them, even if it means standing in line longer or cutting across pews to get to the Priest!!!
This is an odd hierarchy.
Why would a mere seminarian take precedence over a vowed brother or nun?
And what, exactly, is a catechist? Someone who teaches?
I can't imagine any priest running down a list like this.
Ultimately, it is the bishop of the diocese who sets the guidelines.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.