Skip to comments.
Fair Tax Act of 2003
Americans for fair taxation ^
| self
Posted on 10/09/2003 11:17:15 AM PDT by lockeliberty
The following is the list of sponsors and co-sponsors of the Fair Tax Act of 2003.
These are the co-sponsors of House Bill 25.
Rep Akin, W. Todd - 4/10/2003 [MO-2] Rep Baker, Richard H. - 3/26/2003 [LA-6] Rep Bartlett, Roscoe G. - 10/2/2003 [MD-6] Rep Beauprez, Bob - 6/2/2003 [CO-7] Rep Bonilla, Henry - 4/2/2003 [TX-23] Rep Brady, Kevin - 3/18/2003 [TX-8] Rep Burns, Max - 3/31/2003 [GA-12] Rep Carter, John R. - 3/31/2003 [TX-31] Rep Collins, Mac - 2/25/2003 [GA-8] Rep Culberson, John Abney - 2/25/2003 [TX-7] Rep Deal, Nathan - 3/17/2003 [GA-10] Rep DeLay, Tom - 3/26/2003 [TX-22] Rep DeMint, Jim - 9/3/2003 [SC-4] Rep Doolittle, John T. - 3/25/2003 [CA-4] Rep Duncan, John J., Jr. - 9/24/2003 [TN-2] Rep Flake, Jeff - 2/25/2003 [AZ-6] Rep Franks, Trent - 4/2/2003 [AZ-2] Rep Gingrey, Phil - 3/31/2003 [GA-11] Rep Granger, Kay - 7/21/2003 [TX-12] Rep Gutknecht, Gil - 3/26/2003 [MN-1] Rep Hall, Ralph M. - 2/25/2003 [TX-4] Rep Hefley, Joel - 4/3/2003 [CO-5] Rep Hensarling, Jeb - 6/2/2003 [TX-5] Rep Isakson, Johnny - 9/3/2003 [GA-6] Rep Jones, Walter B., Jr. - 9/3/2003 [NC-3] Rep Keller, Ric - 9/15/2003 [FL-8] Rep King, Steve - 2/25/2003 [IA-5] Rep Kingston, Jack - 4/8/2003 [GA-1] Rep Lewis, Jerry - 4/2/2003 [CA-41] Rep McInnis, Scott - 10/8/2003 [CO-3] Rep Miller, Gary G. - 4/30/2003 [CA-42] Rep Miller, Jeff - 4/30/2003 [FL-1] Rep Norwood, Charlie - 3/17/2003 [GA-9] Rep Pearce, Stevan - 3/25/2003 [NM-2] Rep Peterson, Collin C. - 1/7/2003 [MN-7] Rep Shadegg, John B. - 3/31/2003 [AZ-3] Rep Tancredo, Thomas G. - 4/30/2003 [CO-6] Rep Taylor, Charles H. - 9/15/2003 [NC-11] Rep Wilson, Joe - 5/22/2003 [SC-2] Rep Young, Don - 4/30/2003 [AK]
These are the sponsors of Senate Bill 1493
Sen Chambliss, Saxby [GA] Sen Miller, Zell - 7/31/2003 [GA]
If you do not see your Congressman or Senator on this list please call them and urge them to support these Bills.
Click on the link to get more information on the Fair Tax Act of 2003
TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: taxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
To: lockeliberty
From their site:
The solution we propose involves two actions:
* Passage of legislation that institutes a single-rate, FairTax on all final sales of new goods and services. This tax would become the chief source of revenue for the United States government, replacing all federal income and payroll taxes, yet generating the same revenue. The legislation provides for a tax rebate equal to the consumption tax paid on essential goods and services. The rebate ensures that no American will pay tax on the purchase of necessities.
* A constitutional amendment that would repeal the 16th Amendment and make a federal income tax unconstitutional.
You got it backwards. There cannot be a sequential invocation of the 'Fair Tax' and then the repeal of the 16th Amendment. They must be in the reverse order or simultaneous. To do otherwise is to invite Kennedy, Schumer, Clinton, and the rest of the Left to impose BOTH taxes on us.
Get rid of the 16th Amendment. Then I'll support your 'Fair Tax'.
2
posted on
10/09/2003 11:32:58 AM PDT
by
jimkress
(Go away Pat Go away!)
To: All
Your Donation Helps Counter These Guys
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
3
posted on
10/09/2003 11:34:53 AM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: jimkress
From HR 25:
SEC. 101. INCOME TAXES REPEALED.
Subtitle A of title 26 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to income taxes and self-employment taxes) is repealed.
SEC. 102. PAYROLL TAXES REPEALED.
(a) IN GENERAL- Subtitle C of title 26 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to payroll taxes and withholding of income taxes) is repealed.
(b) FUNDING OF SOCIAL SECURITY- For funding of the Social Security Trust Funds from general revenue, see section 201 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 401).
SEC. 103. ESTATE AND GIFT TAXES REPEALED.
Subtitle B of title 26 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to estate and gift taxes) is repealed.
Repealing specific acts of the IRS code, while short of a constitutional amendment, is by far better than the current system. If these specific IRS codes are repealed then the Democraps will be exposed for the socialists that they are once the economic benefits from this legislation becomes clear. Make April 15th just another day.
4
posted on
10/09/2003 11:45:18 AM PDT
by
lockeliberty
(simul justus et peccator)
To: lockeliberty
bump for the Fairtax
5
posted on
10/09/2003 11:46:44 AM PDT
by
rwfromkansas
("Men stumble over the truth, but most pick themselves up as if nothing had happened." Churchill)
To: jimkress; lockeliberty; Taxman
The 16th amendment doesn't tneed to be repealed, since it says: "Congress shall have the power to...", and NOT, "Congress Shall..."
HERMAN CAIN FOR U.S. SENATE!!! (wants to champion the consumption tax)
6
posted on
10/09/2003 12:44:57 PM PDT
by
Xthe17th
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/repeal17)
To: lockeliberty; jimkress
As lockliberty pointed out, the FairTax bill does legislatively end taxes on income. Because of the rules on how bills go through Congress, the legislative bill cannot also contain a Constitutional amendment, and vice-versa.
7
posted on
10/09/2003 12:53:32 PM PDT
by
kevkrom
(This tag line for rent)
To: CHIEF negotiator
bumping you, wherever you might be.
8
posted on
10/09/2003 1:08:44 PM PDT
by
snopercod
(BEGIN PGP ENCRYPED TAGLINE: 9dfk04!-+=k[0kom,4E-98a;f7fqa\{0faGFYbbXa969376mKJ098sd=Ln)
To: lockeliberty
bump
9
posted on
10/09/2003 3:00:50 PM PDT
by
tomakaze
(Todays "useful idiot" is tomorrows "useless eater")
To: snopercod
I second THAT bump! ;>)
10
posted on
10/09/2003 5:34:21 PM PDT
by
Bigun
(IRSsucks@getridof it.com)
To: lockeliberty; txflake; mhking; 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub; JohnHuang2; nutmeg; Mudboy Slim; ...
Just a freindly BUMP in the right direction! ^^^^^^^^
11
posted on
10/09/2003 5:41:14 PM PDT
by
ATOMIC_PUNK
(So lively is my love for Conservatism that my life is dedicated to its very purpose............ A_P)
To: Bigun; snopercod; ATOMIC_PUNK
12
posted on
10/09/2003 6:21:14 PM PDT
by
MeekOneGOP
(Check out the Texas Chicken D 'RATS!: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/keyword/Redistricting)
To: lockeliberty
I don't like a federal sales tax. I think it should be a 10% flat income tax.
13
posted on
10/09/2003 6:21:57 PM PDT
by
2nd_Amendment_Defender
("It is when people forget God that tyrants forge their chains." -- Patrick Henry)
To: 2nd_Amendment_Defender
don't like a federal sales tax. I think it should be a 10% flat income tax. Those who want fundamental tax reform are in no position to be picky. The Fair Tax has the momentum currently. The flat tax has lost most of its.
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Thanks for the heads up!
To: lockeliberty
16
posted on
10/09/2003 7:48:31 PM PDT
by
Coleus
(Only half the patients who go into an abortion clinic come out alive.)
To: Leto; Taxman
`
17
posted on
10/09/2003 7:49:23 PM PDT
by
Coleus
(Only half the patients who go into an abortion clinic come out alive.)
To: lockeliberty
Nice idea. If the government gets rid of the stinkin' income tax and implements this "fair tax" I'll even consider going back to working full time. I just got so damned sick and tired of being taxed to death that I gave up on earning the big bucks, and now earn just enough to survive. My tax rate has dropped from %50+ to less than %10.
Let some other suckers pay the full tax rate, I just finally gave up and shrugged. I wonder how many other people finally threw in the towel and ended up doing the same thing? Maybe that's why they're FINALLY thinking about getting rid of the infernal income tax?
18
posted on
10/09/2003 7:53:45 PM PDT
by
Elliott Jackalope
(We send our kids to Iraq to fight for them, and they send our jobs to India. Now THAT'S gratitude!)
To: Taxman
fyi
19
posted on
10/09/2003 8:09:13 PM PDT
by
dixie sass
(GOD bless America)
To: lockeliberty; kevkrom; Xthe17th; Taxman
Nice try. What Congress CAN legislate it WILL legislate.
If the 16th Amendment is not repealed, Congress will retain the income tax. They'll have some sob story cover but you can bet Clinton, Schumer, Kennedy and the rest will insist, "for the children".
Congress has serially legislatively limited spending too. How long did that last? Every legislative 'victory' was quickly overcome and legislatively rendered impotent.
Clinton, Schumer, Kennedy and the rest, and their Liberal allies on the Republican side of the aisle, cannot be trusted.
The only way to guarantee the end of the income tax is to repeal the 16th Amendment. The only reason we have an income tax is because the 16th Amendment was required to get around the Constitutional restrictions on taxation that COnstitutionally prevented the Congress from imposing an income tax.
Indeed, before the 16th Amendment was ratified, the Supreme Court ruled that the income tax was unconstitutional. That's why the Left was forced to get the Constitution amended.
No repeal of the 16th Amendment, no 'Fair Tax'. Anything else is just a scheme to impose new taxes on us common folk.
Fool me once shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.
We won't be fooled again!
20
posted on
10/09/2003 8:13:45 PM PDT
by
jimkress
(Go away Pat Go away!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson