Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fair Tax Act of 2003
Americans for fair taxation ^ | self

Posted on 10/09/2003 11:17:15 AM PDT by lockeliberty

The following is the list of sponsors and co-sponsors of the Fair Tax Act of 2003.

These are the co-sponsors of House Bill 25.

Rep Akin, W. Todd - 4/10/2003 [MO-2] Rep Baker, Richard H. - 3/26/2003 [LA-6] Rep Bartlett, Roscoe G. - 10/2/2003 [MD-6] Rep Beauprez, Bob - 6/2/2003 [CO-7] Rep Bonilla, Henry - 4/2/2003 [TX-23] Rep Brady, Kevin - 3/18/2003 [TX-8] Rep Burns, Max - 3/31/2003 [GA-12] Rep Carter, John R. - 3/31/2003 [TX-31] Rep Collins, Mac - 2/25/2003 [GA-8] Rep Culberson, John Abney - 2/25/2003 [TX-7] Rep Deal, Nathan - 3/17/2003 [GA-10] Rep DeLay, Tom - 3/26/2003 [TX-22] Rep DeMint, Jim - 9/3/2003 [SC-4] Rep Doolittle, John T. - 3/25/2003 [CA-4] Rep Duncan, John J., Jr. - 9/24/2003 [TN-2] Rep Flake, Jeff - 2/25/2003 [AZ-6] Rep Franks, Trent - 4/2/2003 [AZ-2] Rep Gingrey, Phil - 3/31/2003 [GA-11] Rep Granger, Kay - 7/21/2003 [TX-12] Rep Gutknecht, Gil - 3/26/2003 [MN-1] Rep Hall, Ralph M. - 2/25/2003 [TX-4] Rep Hefley, Joel - 4/3/2003 [CO-5] Rep Hensarling, Jeb - 6/2/2003 [TX-5] Rep Isakson, Johnny - 9/3/2003 [GA-6] Rep Jones, Walter B., Jr. - 9/3/2003 [NC-3] Rep Keller, Ric - 9/15/2003 [FL-8] Rep King, Steve - 2/25/2003 [IA-5] Rep Kingston, Jack - 4/8/2003 [GA-1] Rep Lewis, Jerry - 4/2/2003 [CA-41] Rep McInnis, Scott - 10/8/2003 [CO-3] Rep Miller, Gary G. - 4/30/2003 [CA-42] Rep Miller, Jeff - 4/30/2003 [FL-1] Rep Norwood, Charlie - 3/17/2003 [GA-9] Rep Pearce, Stevan - 3/25/2003 [NM-2] Rep Peterson, Collin C. - 1/7/2003 [MN-7] Rep Shadegg, John B. - 3/31/2003 [AZ-3] Rep Tancredo, Thomas G. - 4/30/2003 [CO-6] Rep Taylor, Charles H. - 9/15/2003 [NC-11] Rep Wilson, Joe - 5/22/2003 [SC-2] Rep Young, Don - 4/30/2003 [AK]

These are the sponsors of Senate Bill 1493

Sen Chambliss, Saxby [GA] Sen Miller, Zell - 7/31/2003 [GA]

If you do not see your Congressman or Senator on this list please call them and urge them to support these Bills.

Click on the link to get more information on the Fair Tax Act of 2003


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: taxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

1 posted on 10/09/2003 11:17:15 AM PDT by lockeliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lockeliberty
From their site:

The solution we propose involves two actions:

* Passage of legislation that institutes a single-rate, FairTax on all final sales of new goods and services. This tax would become the chief source of revenue for the United States government, replacing all federal income and payroll taxes, yet generating the same revenue. The legislation provides for a tax rebate equal to the consumption tax paid on essential goods and services. The rebate ensures that no American will pay tax on the purchase of necessities.
* A constitutional amendment that would repeal the 16th Amendment and make a federal income tax unconstitutional.


You got it backwards. There cannot be a sequential invocation of the 'Fair Tax' and then the repeal of the 16th Amendment. They must be in the reverse order or simultaneous. To do otherwise is to invite Kennedy, Schumer, Clinton, and the rest of the Left to impose BOTH taxes on us.

Get rid of the 16th Amendment. Then I'll support your 'Fair Tax'.
2 posted on 10/09/2003 11:32:58 AM PDT by jimkress (Go away Pat Go away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Your Donation Helps Counter These Guys

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!

3 posted on 10/09/2003 11:34:53 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimkress
From HR 25:

SEC. 101. INCOME TAXES REPEALED.

Subtitle A of title 26 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to income taxes and self-employment taxes) is repealed.

SEC. 102. PAYROLL TAXES REPEALED.

(a) IN GENERAL- Subtitle C of title 26 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to payroll taxes and withholding of income taxes) is repealed.

(b) FUNDING OF SOCIAL SECURITY- For funding of the Social Security Trust Funds from general revenue, see section 201 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 401).

SEC. 103. ESTATE AND GIFT TAXES REPEALED.

Subtitle B of title 26 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to estate and gift taxes) is repealed.

Repealing specific acts of the IRS code, while short of a constitutional amendment, is by far better than the current system. If these specific IRS codes are repealed then the Democraps will be exposed for the socialists that they are once the economic benefits from this legislation becomes clear. Make April 15th just another day.
4 posted on 10/09/2003 11:45:18 AM PDT by lockeliberty (simul justus et peccator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lockeliberty
bump for the Fairtax
5 posted on 10/09/2003 11:46:44 AM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Men stumble over the truth, but most pick themselves up as if nothing had happened." Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jimkress; lockeliberty; Taxman
The 16th amendment doesn't tneed to be repealed, since it says: "Congress shall have the power to...", and NOT, "Congress Shall..."

HERMAN CAIN FOR U.S. SENATE!!! (wants to champion the consumption tax)

6 posted on 10/09/2003 12:44:57 PM PDT by Xthe17th (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/repeal17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lockeliberty; jimkress
As lockliberty pointed out, the FairTax bill does legislatively end taxes on income. Because of the rules on how bills go through Congress, the legislative bill cannot also contain a Constitutional amendment, and vice-versa.
7 posted on 10/09/2003 12:53:32 PM PDT by kevkrom (This tag line for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CHIEF negotiator
bumping you, wherever you might be.
8 posted on 10/09/2003 1:08:44 PM PDT by snopercod (BEGIN PGP ENCRYPED TAGLINE: 9dfk04!-+=k[0kom,4E-98a;f7fqa\{0faGFYbbXa969376mKJ098sd=Ln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lockeliberty
bump
9 posted on 10/09/2003 3:00:50 PM PDT by tomakaze (Todays "useful idiot" is tomorrows "useless eater")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
I second THAT bump! ;>)
10 posted on 10/09/2003 5:34:21 PM PDT by Bigun (IRSsucks@getridof it.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: lockeliberty; txflake; mhking; 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub; JohnHuang2; nutmeg; Mudboy Slim; ...
Just a freindly BUMP in the right direction! ^^^^^^^^
11 posted on 10/09/2003 5:41:14 PM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK (So lively is my love for Conservatism that my life is dedicated to its very purpose............ A_P)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigun; snopercod; ATOMIC_PUNK
I'll third it ...

12 posted on 10/09/2003 6:21:14 PM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Check out the Texas Chicken D 'RATS!: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/keyword/Redistricting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: lockeliberty
I don't like a federal sales tax. I think it should be a 10% flat income tax.
13 posted on 10/09/2003 6:21:57 PM PDT by 2nd_Amendment_Defender ("It is when people forget God that tyrants forge their chains." -- Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2nd_Amendment_Defender
don't like a federal sales tax. I think it should be a 10% flat income tax.

Those who want fundamental tax reform are in no position to be picky. The Fair Tax has the momentum currently. The flat tax has lost most of its.

14 posted on 10/09/2003 7:00:26 PM PDT by ForOurFuture
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Thanks for the heads up!
15 posted on 10/09/2003 7:47:50 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lockeliberty
HR 2525
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/790908/posts
16 posted on 10/09/2003 7:48:31 PM PDT by Coleus (Only half the patients who go into an abortion clinic come out alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leto; Taxman
`
17 posted on 10/09/2003 7:49:23 PM PDT by Coleus (Only half the patients who go into an abortion clinic come out alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lockeliberty
Nice idea. If the government gets rid of the stinkin' income tax and implements this "fair tax" I'll even consider going back to working full time. I just got so damned sick and tired of being taxed to death that I gave up on earning the big bucks, and now earn just enough to survive. My tax rate has dropped from %50+ to less than %10.

Let some other suckers pay the full tax rate, I just finally gave up and shrugged. I wonder how many other people finally threw in the towel and ended up doing the same thing? Maybe that's why they're FINALLY thinking about getting rid of the infernal income tax?
18 posted on 10/09/2003 7:53:45 PM PDT by Elliott Jackalope (We send our kids to Iraq to fight for them, and they send our jobs to India. Now THAT'S gratitude!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Taxman
fyi
19 posted on 10/09/2003 8:09:13 PM PDT by dixie sass (GOD bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lockeliberty; kevkrom; Xthe17th; Taxman
Nice try. What Congress CAN legislate it WILL legislate.

If the 16th Amendment is not repealed, Congress will retain the income tax. They'll have some sob story cover but you can bet Clinton, Schumer, Kennedy and the rest will insist, "for the children".

Congress has serially legislatively limited spending too. How long did that last? Every legislative 'victory' was quickly overcome and legislatively rendered impotent.

Clinton, Schumer, Kennedy and the rest, and their Liberal allies on the Republican side of the aisle, cannot be trusted.

The only way to guarantee the end of the income tax is to repeal the 16th Amendment. The only reason we have an income tax is because the 16th Amendment was required to get around the Constitutional restrictions on taxation that COnstitutionally prevented the Congress from imposing an income tax.

Indeed, before the 16th Amendment was ratified, the Supreme Court ruled that the income tax was unconstitutional. That's why the Left was forced to get the Constitution amended.

No repeal of the 16th Amendment, no 'Fair Tax'. Anything else is just a scheme to impose new taxes on us common folk.

Fool me once shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

We won't be fooled again!
20 posted on 10/09/2003 8:13:45 PM PDT by jimkress (Go away Pat Go away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson