Skip to comments.
Turkey Cabinet Agrees to Deploy Troops to Iraq
Yahoo
Posted on 10/06/2003 6:56:37 AM PDT by sonsofliberty2000
ANKARA, Turkey (AP) Turkey's Cabinet agrees to deploy troops to help stabilize Iraq, seeks authorization from Parliament.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: allies; allyturkey; multinational; rebuildingiraq; stabilizationforce; turkeytroops
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
To: sonsofliberty2000
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=540&e=2&u=/ap/20031006/ap_on_re_mi_ea/turkey_us_iraq ANKARA, Turkey - Turkey's Cabinet agreed Monday to send troops to Iraq (news - web sites) to help stabilize the country a decision that could relieve U.S. operations in Iraq and help Turkey mend frayed relations with the United States.
The decision now faces a tough approval from parliament, which is likely to vote on the issue this week. If approved, Turkey would become the first predominantly Muslim nation to contribute troops to Iraq.
2
posted on
10/06/2003 6:58:09 AM PDT
by
sonsofliberty2000
(The Patriot Paradox: All Your Interviews Belong to Us)
To: All
3
posted on
10/06/2003 6:58:22 AM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: sonsofliberty2000
Translation: Screw you Chirac and you liberal rats in the US, Bush is right.
4
posted on
10/06/2003 6:59:00 AM PDT
by
VRWC_minion
(Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
To: a_Turk
What's your take on this, Turk?
5
posted on
10/06/2003 7:00:10 AM PDT
by
xzins
(And now I will show you the most excellent way!)
To: sonsofliberty2000
a decision that could relieve U.S. operations in Iraq Thus freeing up US troops for use on the "next" target in the WOT, Syria.
6
posted on
10/06/2003 7:08:41 AM PDT
by
ASA Vet
(Citizens have the government they deserve.)
To: sonsofliberty2000
Bush's one big failure was not lining up support for reconstruction outside of the framework of the UN-- so he had to go back for a new reconstruction resolution. If he can get Turkey (and India and South Korea, Germany and Russia) to help, he will have mostly redeemed himself. You can't say the UN risks irrelevancy and then mostly act like they are still relevant afterward.
To: sonsofliberty2000
The Kurds will love this.
8
posted on
10/06/2003 7:12:41 AM PDT
by
Alter Kaker
(Whatever tears one may shed, in the end one always blows one’s nose.-Heine)
To: GraniteStateConservative
I would take issue to your thoughts of failure.
We are a member of the UN. We must allow the UN to fail. That is precisely what has been done. The UN was allowed to fail and then the reconstruction absent the drag of UN dithering can proceed. Kofi Annan refused the job, Condi Rice accepted it.
There was no Bush failure. There was complex manuvering that eased the UN out of the way.
9
posted on
10/06/2003 7:17:09 AM PDT
by
bert
(Don't Panic!)
To: bert
You are correct in allowing the UN to fail.... The UN is just one more diplomatic entaglement which only serves to hurt Republican Presidents and embrass the US under Democrat Presidents. After the next election for US President, provided Bush is reelected, the UN will gravel and many opposing nations will craw back to seek forgiveness from the US. The present diplomatic pressure in the world is directed at electing a democrat/socialist president.
10
posted on
10/06/2003 7:36:39 AM PDT
by
Jumper
("Its economic warfare, stupid")
To: sonsofliberty2000
But why would Turkey want to send troops into a Quagmire? </dripping sarcasm>
To: Alter Kaker
Hmmm. Seems to me that not many of the Iraqi groups will take kindly to this. Isn't this a none too smart move on our part? Part of the reason we couldn't use Turkey for troop deployment was their insistence that they be allowed to have troops in Iraq; we wouldn't grant that and they voted to "punish" us. What's changed?
12
posted on
10/06/2003 8:12:32 AM PDT
by
Adder
(.)
To: Alter Kaker
It's not great.
What the Turks really want in Northern Iraq is dead Kurds and access to oil fields. They have proven to be unreliable allies, and I cannot think why US is bothering with them any more.
Frankly, I think we need to arm the Kurds bigtime. They are more reliable allies, they've bled with our troops, and they are less likely to stab us in the back.
13
posted on
10/06/2003 8:35:27 AM PDT
by
Tilly
To: Tilly
What the Turks really want in Northern Iraq is dead Kurds and access to oil fields. The $8 Billion + loan we just gave Turkey is provisional, and based on the agreement that the do not enter the Kurdish-controlled zone.
14
posted on
10/06/2003 8:39:30 AM PDT
by
SunStar
(Democrats piss me off!)
To: OXENinFLA
15
posted on
10/06/2003 8:53:48 AM PDT
by
ASA Vet
(Citizens have the government they deserve.)
To: GraniteStateConservative
Bush's one big failure was not lining up support for reconstruction outside of the framework of the UNI disagree. There are 28 or 29 other countries currently assisting our efforts in Iraq. I'd call that doing a fine job of lining up support outside the UN's framework.
16
posted on
10/06/2003 9:35:48 AM PDT
by
Coop
(God bless our troops!)
To: SunStar
The $8 Billion + loan we just gave Turkey is provisional, and based on the agreement that the do not enter the Kurdish-controlled zone. Good info. Thanks. But Turkey was not there when we needed it. Screw 'em!
17
posted on
10/06/2003 9:37:20 AM PDT
by
Coop
(God bless our troops!)
Comment #18 Removed by Moderator
To: Coop
i agree with you where were they when we asked to fly through their airspace they r just like france see an oppertunaty for mony and jump all over it
To: Coop
Quantity, not quality (# of troops, support staff) is what we have now. We need both. They all give a handful of help and it fills up a thimble.
20
posted on
10/06/2003 10:02:54 AM PDT
by
GraniteStateConservative
("We happy because when we switch on the TV you never see Saddam Hussein. That's a big happy.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson