Bill CLinton Just Called! (recording, of course)

10/5/03 | Vanity

[South40]

The slick one just called to urge a NO vote on the California recall.

After rambling on how undemocratic it was he then cited how dave grayvis supported a woman's right to choose and a myriad of other liberal positions.

After he gave his presentaion a fast-paced almost garbled message told by whom the call was funded. It was laughable. The only part I caught was the CTA and some other educator's group. My wife's a teacher so the call was no doubt directed at her. Even if I hadn't intercepted the call it wouldn't have worked; she's already voted YES on the recall abd FOR Arnold via absentee ballot. Her union dues may have been spent funding efforts against the recall but they didn't get her vote.

[jwalburg]

Lol. Clinton recording, calling teachers to say Davis is a pro-abort. That'll work!

[Support Free Republic]

"Facts are stubborn things, and whatever may be our
wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions,
they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence."
- John Adams -

Make your statement.

[snopercod]

Did you Lysol the phone after that call?

[Chancellor Palpatine]

Did you exorcise your phone?

[Imal]

I got a call from Bill Clinton, too. But it was just a "heavy breathing" call.

[JulieRNR21]

Wish I was a 'California Girl' so I could:

VOTE FOR ARNOLD and ANNOY Bill & Hill!

[Right_in_Virginia]

The slick one just called to urge a NO vote on the California recall.

Clinton helping Davis....God works in mysterious ways, indeed.

Ba-bye, Davis. ;^D

[Paleo Conservative]

After rambling on how undemocratic it was

Clinton is entirely wrong. The recall is not only democratic, it is the most extreme practice of democracy. If anything the recall violates the principals of constitutional republicanism.

[MonroeDNA]

I guess I've been around here for about 6 years or so now. Time sure flies!

When Jim Robinson started this site, it was because he was fed up with the liberal media, and how they would not let people worldwide know about the corruption of the Clinton Administration. A few of us, equally concerned, (with great luck) found it fast.

In the early days, FR was a day-to-day operation, always on the brink of bankruptcy. Jim kept on, and we chipped in when it became too much. We knew how important this site was, and is. Sometimes, it came down to the wire, and we wrote checks, and sent them in, as best we could.

Look at it now. We all get our best information from this site. It is huge, with thousands of posters, and millions of readers. Yet Jim still keeps it alive because of his conviction, and he is absolutely NOT making a profit on it. He just believes. As do we.

BTW, did you know that the founder of this site is in a wheelchair (sorry Jim; I know you think it doesn't make a r*ts a$$ difference. Hey, some folks out there need to come down a peg, like I have.).

Think of it! In the darkest days of the Clinton Administration, there was a lone internet site where people with integrity, brains, and sheer gumption could discuss the dangers faced by the US. Not on CNN, for sure.

Earthmovers like Drudge, Ann Coulter, Rush, WFBuckley, his brother, Savage, Buchanan, both houses of Congress (many) check in to see what we think.

The opposition checks it out, too. Like the NY times staff, CNN, AFL-CIO, China, etc. Trust me, they all come here to read. Even YOUR post. You know by now how they are whining about Rush? We're next, as soon as they figure out how they can trash this site without it getting a million hits.

I've been broke; I've been not broke. I've slept in my car. I know how it feels to be squeezed tight with bills. Folks with giant bills: You're not alone, and you have friends here. :)

If you love this site as much as I do, please, please sign up for automatic payment of just $3 per month. Don't be embarrassed if you think this is too little. It absolutely is not. You $3 a month folks are our grassroots movement heroes. Be proud. Become one of the thousand points of light here, and you will so feel proud every month. We'll thank you for it, and are so glad to have you on board.

I know things are rough out there. But you are tough, and a member of the greatest grassroots freedom movement in 100 years. Together we are making history, and will change the world, as we already have. The best is yet to come.

Most countries out there would consider this website illegal. They hate us, for our freedom. Their systems cannot stand, in the face of Freedom. The people there read us when they can, when they are “allowed” to, and are not being tortured. They flock to us, America, because they want to be free. Help us help them.

Would you please, please consider signing up for just $3 a month? Please? That’s all it takes, really, believe it or not. You will make a world of difference, to, well, the world. Be proud, Americans, and please help out!

[jwalburg]

True, but Dems use "democratic" as a synonym for "good," and anything with "republic" in it is automatically synonymous with "bad."

[onyx]

Are you a registered democrat? :-)

[Howlin]

[South40]

No, but the wife is. I got her to go to a Simon rally with me last year. But she voted for davis anyway. Now she regrets having done so.

[clintonh8r]

Hard to believe all these RATbastards are hitching their political credibility to a loser like davis.

[EllaMinnow]

Janet Reno called me last year to ask for my vote in the primary.
I never could figure out why they were calling registered Republicans in a closed primary state, but I sure had fun screaming at her over the phone!

[Paleo Conservative]

True, but Dems use "democratic" as a synonym for "good," and anything with "republic" in it is automatically synonymous with "bad."

Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!
Benjamin Franklin

[jwalburg]

Good ol' Ben.

[vp_cal]

The problem with Arnold is that if further news
comes out about his past pertaining to violent
assaults on women, it would do more damage to the
'cause' than if Gray Davis stayed a few more years.

All Republicans would end up getting tainted by one
person's crimes since Arnold, as governor of a prominent
state, would be one of the party's most visible spokespersons.

In the end I do not know for certain what will be best(or
least worst) for California. But I do think that the
downside is far greater than the potential upside of having
Arnold in office.