Skip to comments.
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER'S LOVE CHILD SCANDAL
National Enquirer ^
| Today
| National Enquirer
Posted on 10/05/2003 1:18:11 PM PDT by LongsforReagan
On the eve of the California gubernatorial recall election, Arnold Schwarzenegger is embroiled in a love child scandal!
According to an article in the London paper, The Daily Mail, a Californian woman, Tammy Baker-Tousignant, has told pals that Arnold secretly fathered her son while he was already married to Maria Shriver.
Confronted by The ENQUIRER in front of her suburban home in Brea, Calif. -- where she lives with her husband, Tammy would only say: "I don't want to talk about this." Tammy previously denied the claim to the British press, and Arnold insists The Daily Mail story is not true.
But an inside source told The ENQUIRER that Tammy and Arnold were very close a decade ago.
"She was in her mid-20s when she and Arnold first met and struck up a friendship," said the source.
"She was a flight attendant aboard a private aircraft that Arnold frequently chartered.
"While Arnold was married, he was smitten by her bubbly personality.
"She was equally smitten by his celebrity status.
"A pal of Tammy's said that not only was there was an affair between Arnold and the Tammy but that Tammy claimed that her son was fathered by Arnold.
"When I contacted Tammy to ask about her pal's allegation, she denied that her son is Arnold's child.
"But when I pulled her son's birth certificate, I found that the father's name was blank!
"And even the woman herself admits that over the years many people have commented to her on how much her son bears a physical resemblance to Arnold."
The Schwarzenegger love child claim has also been made by several other women who knew Tammy at the time, according to the inside source.
A number of years ago rumors of Arnold's affair with Tammy began to leak out publicly. Several people knew about the rumors and word was getting out.
By the late 1990s, Maria Shriver got wind of it and arranged for Tammy to lose her job.
Reporter Wendy Leigh investigated the love child story for the London paper The Daily Mail and told The ENQUIRER: "Despite Tammy's denials, I researched this story for two months and I think it's right on."
But the inside source declared: "Although Tammy dismisses the allegations that Arnold is the father of her oldest son, she hasn't come forward yet with the DNA test that proves it isn't true.
"Until she does, the verdict is out on whether California's Republican candidate for governor fathered a love child."
Published on: October 5, 2003
TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: davis; demorats; gigigoyette; recall; schwarzenegger; sillygossip; slime
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-227 next last
This is very lame. Nothing here, just an attempt to cash in.
To: All
DON'T MEAN TO BUG YOU.....
BUT CAN YOU HELP?
PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic
LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO
CA 93794
Or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
STOP BY A BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD
It's on the Breaking News Sidebar
2
posted on
10/05/2003 1:18:51 PM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: LongsforReagan
ENOUGH!!!!!!!!!!
3
posted on
10/05/2003 1:20:20 PM PDT
by
Mears
To: LongsforReagan
I vote for Arnold reluctantly. He must be elected if we are every going to stop the slimy RATS from pulling this crap over and over.
4
posted on
10/05/2003 1:21:43 PM PDT
by
doug from upland
(Why did DemocRATS allow a perjuring rapist to remain in the Oval Office?)
To: LongsforReagan
How panicked do the Rats have to be to be shoveling this trash?
Comment #6 Removed by Moderator
To: LongsforReagan
The Enquirer (and the other supermarket rags) were taken over by a company controlled by Roger Altman on behalf of the clintonoids during clinton's second term, probably because they were the only media sources that ventured to break the media silence on clinton's crimes.
Since then the clintonoids have occasionally used it when none of the so-called reputable papers wants to print something. Now the NY Daily News can print a story tomorrow saying that The Enquirer alleges that Arnold has a love child. And on from there.
7
posted on
10/05/2003 1:23:38 PM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: LongsforReagan
Arnold should file suit in England alleging "false light" publication and defamation. Idiots do not even have a affidavit from the mother supporting these allegations. Slam dunk win for Arnold worth millions.
8
posted on
10/05/2003 1:23:49 PM PDT
by
ex-Texan
(Read Sun Tzu: The Cold War Never Ended)
To: LongsforReagan
Lame is an overstatement. Now let's see. The lady in question does not claim Arnold is the father of her child but her unnamed "freinds" make the charge.
Ironically, this digusting parade of slurs and smears may help the conservative cause. Arnold and his wife may finally realize who the enemy is and what excrement they are made of.
9
posted on
10/05/2003 1:25:06 PM PDT
by
Maynerd
To: LongsforReagan
Totally misleading headline. Of course. But some people never get past the headlines. This probably won't do much damage, there have just been way too much of these "stories" and all of them without proof of any kind. Anyone can make an allegation. And any irresponbile publication can print a "story". Gone are the days of multiple sources and true investigation! LONG gone.
10
posted on
10/05/2003 1:25:06 PM PDT
by
BonnieJ
To: LongsforReagan
What happened to this child's right to privacy? This is child abuse by the press. They have no right to invade any child's life, regardless of the facts or lack of them, either way it's just plain wrong. The media has gone too far.
11
posted on
10/05/2003 1:25:36 PM PDT
by
tioga
To: LongsforReagan
If she doesn't want to talk about it, why is she talking about it, and why did it take her ten years to proclaim Arnie the father of her child? The man is a mega millionaire. She wasn't even interested in child support?
Nothing like "news" from the Daily Mail and National Inquirer.
12
posted on
10/05/2003 1:26:08 PM PDT
by
cake_crumb
(UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
To: Maynerd
I agree. Maria should reconsider her party affiliation after being subjected to all this slimy stuff.
Comment #14 Removed by Moderator
To: LongsforReagan
The ENQUIRER's certainly busy, Rush and Arnold in the same week. Somebody please remind me, what Democrat is it that owns The ENQUIRER?
15
posted on
10/05/2003 1:28:16 PM PDT
by
xJones
To: doug from upland
Then you're voting for a rat yourself. Arnold's a RINO and anything but conservative. He is smuttier than Clinton and the Mapplethorpe estate has some very interesting pix to blackmail him with if he steps out of line. Don't get suckered.
16
posted on
10/05/2003 1:30:20 PM PDT
by
attagirl
To: doug from upland
This is sickening.....truly sickening!
17
posted on
10/05/2003 1:30:45 PM PDT
by
Dog
To: ex-Texan
Hell yeah! Libel laws in Britain are unbelievably harsh. He should go get 'em!!!
To: tioga
Did you feel the same way about Clinton's alleged "love child"?
19
posted on
10/05/2003 1:31:49 PM PDT
by
halfdome
To: martin_fierro
This is so weird. I have never even seen pictures of Arnold's own children.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-227 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson