1 posted on
09/30/2003 9:24:16 PM PDT by
kattracks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
To: kattracks
Oh my God !!!! What shall we do ?!!! We need an investigation at the top and the bottom !!!or maybe the middle!!!!
2 posted on
09/30/2003 9:27:25 PM PDT by
woofie
To: kattracks
The vile Demonrats will stop at nothing to try and smear Bush.
3 posted on
09/30/2003 9:29:07 PM PDT by
Steely Glint
("Communists are just Democrats in a big hurry.")
To: kattracks
You know it wasnt much of a secret when your hairdresser tells you in confidence that she heard Mrs Wilson worked for the CIA
4 posted on
09/30/2003 9:30:06 PM PDT by
woofie
To: kattracks
This smear should drop Bush's credibility with the voters another 10-15 points. A little lower and hillary can jump in the race.
5 posted on
09/30/2003 9:31:20 PM PDT by
Jeff Chandler
(This tagline has been suspended or banned.)
To: kattracks
So what's the bigger story here? Doesn't anyone still find it incredible that Wilson, a Bush hater, was given the task of vetting one of the most important allegations in Bush's State of the Union Address?
To: kattracks
EXCELLENT CATCH!!! Thank you kattracks!
7 posted on
09/30/2003 9:33:47 PM PDT by
YaYa123
(@ It's All Politics.com)
To: kattracks
Novak says it's a non-story, and it's his story. Conduct the routine CIA leak investigation, and plant daisies on it
|
8 posted on
09/30/2003 9:34:16 PM PDT by
Sabertooth
(No Drivers' Licences for Illegal Aliens. Petition SB60. http://www.saveourlicense.com/n_home.htm)
To: kattracks
What form of rectal cranial inversion made Novak think it was OK to reveal the identity of CIA employees?
To: kattracks; aristeides; okie01
Second, the CIA never warned me that the disclosure of Wilson's wife working at the agency would endanger her or anybody else. What do they have to say? They said don't tell - isn't that enough? Novak created this mess.
Also, this article might confirm the idea that the "leak" was from gabbiness, and an assumption Novak wouldn't tell. That is, saying the words "CIA" to Novak wasn't intended to do anything political.
11 posted on
09/30/2003 9:36:11 PM PDT by
Shermy
(Show us the glove box.)
To: Wolfstar
PinG!
12 posted on
09/30/2003 9:36:52 PM PDT by
Chad Fairbanks
(<Tag>Something unspeakably clever</Tag>)
To: kattracks
However, an unofficial source at the Agency says she has been an analyst, not in covert operationsA little late for damage control
16 posted on
09/30/2003 9:38:53 PM PDT by
paul51
To: kattracks
I think it's Tenet and he is gone.
20 posted on
09/30/2003 9:40:51 PM PDT by
GWfan
To: kattracks
SPOTREP
To: kattracks
"Third, it was not much of a secret."
Okay, nothing to see here, move along, that's it, keep moving...........
22 posted on
09/30/2003 9:41:43 PM PDT by
nuconvert
( Stop thinking about it and do it.)
To: GOPJ; Pharmboy; reformed_democrat; RatherBiased.com; nopardons; Tamsey; Miss Marple; SwatTeam; ...
This is the Mainstream Media Shenanigans ping list. Please freepmail me to be added or dropped.
Please note this is a medium- to high-volume list.
Please feel free to ping me if you come across a thread you would think worthy of this ping list. I can't catch them all!
25 posted on
09/30/2003 9:43:21 PM PDT by
Timesink
To: kattracks
The reason why the democrats get away with stuff like this is because the republicans are political appeasers and weak like the French when it comes to domestic policy.
What good is fighting the radical Muslims overseas when we are surrendering at home to the policical enemies of American culture?
26 posted on
09/30/2003 9:43:24 PM PDT by
dinok
To: kattracks
Novak should just tell us who it was and retire. He is ancient and not a good advocate for our side, now his reporting has gotten us in this fix-- what good is he? Here's to hoping that the leaker is someone from outside the White House.
27 posted on
09/30/2003 9:44:52 PM PDT by
faithincowboys
(Defeat the Fifth Column Leftist Bastards)
To: kattracks
CNN's Novak should be arrested for knowingly compromising a CIA agents (or analyst) identity.
Oooh! I screwed up big time.
28 posted on
09/30/2003 9:45:10 PM PDT by
Pro-Bush
(Homeland Security + Tom Ridge = Open Borders --> Demand Change!)
To: kattracks
"However, an unofficial source at the Agency says she has been an analyst, not in covert operations."
There you have it, she wasn't involved in Covert ops and therefore there is no scandal.
period.
29 posted on
09/30/2003 9:45:24 PM PDT by
Pubbie
("Last time I checked, he doesn't have a vote" - Tom DeLay on Ari Fleischer's demand for Tax-Rebates)
To: kattracks
I think someone put it well the other night,
"Novak's a moron"
35 posted on
09/30/2003 9:46:42 PM PDT by
nuconvert
( Stop thinking about it and do it.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson