Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kattracks
What form of rectal cranial inversion made Novak think it was OK to reveal the identity of CIA employees?
10 posted on 09/30/2003 9:34:49 PM PDT by Dialup Llama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dialup Llama
Didn't you read his explanation? Here tis:

He asked me not to use her name, saying she probably never again will be given a foreign assignment but that exposure of her name might cause "difficulties" if she travels abroad.

He never suggested to me that Wilson's wife or anybody else would be endangered. If he had, I would not have used her name.

I used it in the sixth paragraph of my column because it looked like the missing explanation of an otherwise incredible choice by the CIA for its mission"

14 posted on 09/30/2003 9:38:19 PM PDT by YaYa123 (@ It's All Politics.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Dialup Llama
What form of rectal cranial inversion made Novak think it was OK to reveal the identity of CIA employees?

His knowledge of the law. Except in extremely specific circumstances (so extreme that nobody has ever been prosecuted for the offense), it's not illegal for a reporter to name even a classified CIA operative, much less a paper pusher. Any blame goes squarely on the government leaker. And nobody's ever even been prosecuted for that, either.

38 posted on 09/30/2003 9:48:44 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson