Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kattracks; aristeides; okie01
Second, the CIA never warned me that the disclosure of Wilson's wife working at the agency would endanger her or anybody else.

What do they have to say? They said don't tell - isn't that enough? Novak created this mess.

Also, this article might confirm the idea that the "leak" was from gabbiness, and an assumption Novak wouldn't tell. That is, saying the words "CIA" to Novak wasn't intended to do anything political.

11 posted on 09/30/2003 9:36:11 PM PDT by Shermy (Show us the glove box.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Shermy
Any leak of classified information is routinely passed by the Agency to Justice, averaging one a week. This investigative request was made in July shortly after the column was published.

I'm hoping this is accurate. Is Novak indicting himself?

32 posted on 09/30/2003 9:45:58 PM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Shermy
"Also, this article might confirm the idea that the "leak" was from gabbiness..."

That clearly appears to be the case.

I wonder what would've happened if Novak had written only that "Wilson was sent to Niger on his wife's recommendation". I.e., without mentioning her distinctive name, Valerie Plame.

Because, to my mind, Novak was certainly right to report the nepotistic aspect of Wilson's appointment -- a Clintonite hack is appointed to investigate a Bush administration claim by a CIA committee headed by his wife!?

69 posted on 09/30/2003 10:05:34 PM PDT by okie01 (www.ArmorforCongress.com...because Congress isn't for the morally halt and the mentally lame.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson