Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Assassin secretly deported after JFK killed
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Wednesday, September 24, 2003

Posted on 09/24/2003 12:04:04 AM PDT by JohnHuang2

Just two days after the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, a suspected killer and known foreign terrorist was captured in Dallas, Texas.

The U.S. government was aware the man had received rigorous training in a foreign military and was a member of a covert paramilitary organization that already had murdered dozens, if not hundreds of people, including military officers, high ranking police officials and democratically elected politicians.


President Kennedy speaking in Fort Worth the morning of Nov. 22, 1963

Amazingly, according to the authors of an explosive new book promising to unravel the 40-year mystery of who killed JFK, there is no evidence to show he ever even was questioned about his presence in Dallas so soon after Kennedy's murder.

Instead, say co-authors Brad O'Leary and L.E. Seymour in the upcoming WND Books release "Triangle of Death," the man was picked up and quickly and quietly flown out of the United States under a cloak of secrecy.

Although the book has not yet been released to bookstores, it has already shot up to 218 on the Amazon chart just from initial pre-sales.

The story of the mysterious assassin is revealed in a CIA document backing the author's compelling argument that President Kennedy was killed Nov. 22, 1963, as the result of a massive conspiracy between the CIA-installed government of South Vietnam, the French global heroin syndicate and the New Orleans Mafia.

"This deportation, in fact, and the sinister man in question, have been the subject of repeated U.S. Justice Department investigations for more than three decades," the authors write, "investigations that have been deliberately withheld from the American public and the world."

The suspicious expulsion also never was reported to the Warren Commission, the official investigative body appointed by President Lyndon Johnson.

"This revelation can only be described as colossal in the realm of assassination research, and one would accordingly expect the league of Kennedy researchers to jump all over it, examine it to every degree, and then include its startling importance in the overall field of their work," O'Leary and Seymour write. "But that never happened."

The CIA document reveals the man was a French assassin – wanted by France for subversion – who was in Fort Worth on the morning of Nov. 22, 1963, and in Dallas in the afternoon.

On that morning, President Kennedy was in Forth Worth, giving a speech in front of the Hotel Texas. In the afternoon, in Dallas, he was shot to death.

Noting all U.S. deportations were executed by the Immigration and Naturalization Service, the authors ask: "Why would an authority of the United States Justice Department deport a known terrorist?"

One would believe, they write, that he would have been "apprehended and imprisoned, or at least sent back to France where the legal authorities there had already clearly deemed him an enemy of the state."

"But there's no evidence to suggest [he] was ever even questioned about his presence in Dallas so soon after Kennedy's murder."

The French, who believe he was expelled to either Mexico or Canada, identified him as a member of the right-wing extremist group, the OAS, Organisation de l'Armée Secrète, comprised of deserters from the French Army in opposition to President Charles de Gaulle's granting of independence to Algeria. The members of the "Secret Army" were involved in countless acts of terrorism and assassination.

"Triangle of Death" answers questions surrounding this previously dismissed episode and pieces it together with recently declassified federal documents, material supplied by the KGB, information from the Bonano crime family, documents obtained from a French court and the only interview done with a French witness previously only debriefed by the FBI and CIA.

As WorldNetDaily reported, newly released tapes of Johnson's telephone conversations also corroborate the central premise the book, showing the Kennedy White House did not merely tolerate or encourage the murder of its ally, South Vietnamese President Ngo Dinh Diem, but organized and executed it, writes Fox News White House correspondent James Rosen in the Weekly Standard.

Coup d'état

"Triangle of Death" – which includes details of a first-time-ever crime scene re-creation at Dealey Plaza – shows how Kennedy planned and developed the coup d'état that resulted in the political murders of the Catholic president, Diem, and his two brothers just 22 days before his death. The U.S. State Department suppressed this information for more than 30 years.


Evidence includes federal documents that only recently have been declassified or released – exclusively to the authors.

The authors reveal a Mafia chieftain, who employed Jack Ruby and Lee Harvey Oswald's uncle, confessed to federal officers he had been directly involved in Kennedy's murder.

In addition, O'Leary and Seymour recount how the United States and the Soviet Union both went on high military alert immediately after Kennedy's death, bringing the world to the brink of nuclear annihilation.

Other facts uncovered by the book include:

Two chapters of this book have already been used to make two different television specials – one on PBS and the other on the History Channel.

Co-author O'Leary, involved in politics for more than 25 years, publishes the O'Leary Report, one of the most influential publications in American politics. His clients have included more than 60 political and public figures, including Sen. John Tower and Texas Gov. John Connolly, who rode in Kennedy's car when he was shot. O'Leary also hosted his own radio show on NBC for seven years and was a contributing columnist for USA Today Weekend magazine. He currently is president of Associated Television News in Los Angeles.

O'Leary is available for media interviews through Shirley and Banister and Associates at (703) 739-5920.

His co-author, Seymour, is a free-lance writer and author of 15 novels, including "The Stickmen" and "Operator 'B'."

False claims?

O'Leary and Seymour note investigative bodies of the U.S. government have made numerous claims, including that Lee Harvey Oswald was the lone assassin; that only two shots hit their target, that the bullets fired that day all came from the sixth floor of the Texas Schoolbook Depository; and that Kennedy was killed because he was preparing to pull all U.S. troops out of Vietnam.


The authors insist all of these claims are false and are designed to placate the American public and distract them from the facts of the case.

They acknowledge most readers will find it difficult to accept that Kennedy authorized the overthrow of the Catholic government of South Vietnam and the assassination of Diem, South Vietnam's democratically elected, constitutional president.

After all, Kennedy had generously pledged American troops, military equipment and tax dollars to protect South Vietnam from the threat of communism.

But the authors of "Triangle of Death" provide evidence Kennedy personally asked a high-ranking U.S. military officer to assassinate Diem, who was a political disaster-in-the-making for the president.

The events were set into motion when a Buddhist leader named Quang Duc calmly sat down in a Saigon street June 11, 1963, soaked himself with gasoline, lit a match and burned himself to death.

The news swept through the world, and when the full extent of Diem's brutality toward the Buddhists became apparent, America immediately began to ask itself the obvious questions, O'Leary and Seymour write: "Why is the U.S. supporting a foreign government that engages in religious persecution? Why is President Kennedy sending U.S. military personnel to help the government of a man who puts his own people into concentration camps?"

The authors point out: "Until then, America believed the increasing number of U.S. men and women being sent to South Vietnam – close to 15,000 by June 1963 – and the $1.2-million-per-day aid package were to help the South Vietnamese fight the deadly Vietcong. But literally overnight, the U.S. was internationally perceived as a bunch of buffoons who were propping up a tyrant."


South Vietnamese President Ngo Dinh Diem was assassinated Nov. 1, 1963

With the next U.S. presidential election just over a year away, they write, "Kennedy was infuriated; moreover, he and his political consultants were scared."

People "already believed that Kennedy had stolen the election, based on suspicious vote-counting in Illinois; a Catholic U.S. president supporting a Catholic fanatic who was intent on persecuting another religious group would provide them with all the ammunition they needed in November of '64."

The authors contend they have irrefutable evidence the Kennedy White House supported a coup d'etat against the government of South Vietnam and the assassination of President Diem.

"More than anything else," they write, "this was the rich ground in which a counter-conspiracy was planted, the conspiracy that led to President Kennedy's own assassination."


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: assassination; bookreview; conspiracy; grassyknoll; jfk; jfkassassination; jfkconspiracy; jfkkilled; kennedyassassination; tinfoil; triangleofdeath
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-230 next last
To: Jim Noble
Unfortunately, your scenario also means that a coup-de-etat occured and the government of the United States was overthrown. That is not something a patriot would have done no matter how much he disagreed with the President.

It is, however, something a power-mad, out-of-control group would do to maintain its own power.
41 posted on 09/24/2003 1:50:00 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (America's Enemies foreign and domestic agree. Bush must be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: appeal2
One of his informants, Jose Aleman, told the Bureau of the comments Santos Traficante made stating that JFK was going to be "hit." Others told of the threats from Carlos Marcello, a Costello protege. Hoover ignored them all.

While I don't think Hoover set it up, I do believe he knew what was going to happen, let it, then covered it up every way he could.
42 posted on 09/24/2003 1:54:36 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (America's Enemies foreign and domestic agree. Bush must be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Lael
Oddly enough, we pulled out the tape 'The Men who killed Kennedy', just last night and watched it again. I wanted my son to see and hear what type of evidence had been supressed.

Each time you watch it, you pick up on things that were missed before. Last night, I caught the part where they talked about JFK's 'doubles'. How many did he have etc. Makes sense. Doubles were used and one probably died the same day. This would explain how they were able to prodice false or doctored autopsy photos that didn't jive with what eye witnesses saw. This would also explain the switched caskets and their contents.

Cyril Wecht (forensic pathologist) was quite outspoken during 'The men that killed Kennedy' about the shenannigans that went on, including the missing brain, so that the brain could not be studied to show which direction the bullet came from.

43 posted on 09/24/2003 1:58:29 PM PDT by ET(end tyranny) (Psalm 146:3 -- Put not your trust in princes, nor in the son of man, in whom there is no help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: marron; Jim Noble
The explanation for the assassination that you are suggesting is, I think, suggested between the lines in Seymour Hersh's The Dark Side of Camelot, and I strongly suspect that that explanation was suggested to Hersh by the CIA sources that Hersh obviously had.
44 posted on 09/24/2003 1:59:28 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: marron
In any other country in the world, it is understood that if the president goes beyond the pale, at some point a panel of military officers will remove him. He can go quietly into exile, or he can go the hard way, but he goes. There is no tradition of military defense of civilian institutions in our country, so exile is not an option. That leaves the hard way.

Your theory is not so far fetched as most. We came very close to it in the 1930's with FDR.

45 posted on 09/24/2003 1:59:58 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Hold the forks / The knives are coming / Spoons are on their way….)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort; dighton; general_re

Re your #4, that guy got around.

46 posted on 09/24/2003 2:00:39 PM PDT by aculeus (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Impeachment might have been thought undesirable. But what about the obvious alternative of making JFK an offer he couldn't refuse, and procuring his resignation for, say, reasons of health?
47 posted on 09/24/2003 2:02:08 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: veronica
I have read it and it is filled with misinformation, distortions, outright lies and sophistic use of red herrings and straw men. It certainly cannot and does not explain how
a gun with a misattached scope was able to be shot more accurately and faster by an out of practice, mediocre shooter than by firearm experts.

Not only could the experts NOT shoot it accurately until the scope attachment was shimmed into a semblence of proper attachment but many were afraid to shoot the gun at all for fear it would blow up in their faces. This was as poor a gun FOR ANY purposes as could be purchased.

Tracing it to Oswald involves leaps of faith I am not willing to make. Particularly after some of the lies to the Warren Commission told by the FBI and CIA have been revealed under the FOIA. The gun "found" was NOT even the gun he "ordered."
48 posted on 09/24/2003 2:04:16 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (America's Enemies foreign and domestic agree. Bush must be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Day of the Jackal bump. Weren't there reports that the CIA was tied in with the OAS?
49 posted on 09/24/2003 2:05:01 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maria S; Alamo-Girl
......and their biographies will read as though they were saviors of the US.......

And that is precisely one of the most important American historical documents is the Down Side Legacy by Freepers own Alamo Girl.



50 posted on 09/24/2003 2:08:15 PM PDT by bert (Don't Panic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bert
Jeepers, bert! Thank you oh so very much for the kudos and encouragement! Hugs!!!
51 posted on 09/24/2003 2:10:00 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
My Father wrote a book with a woman named Marita Lorenz (You can do a google search) who was a spy who contends that she was sent by the CIA during Kennedy's term to kill Castro. Instead, she fell in love with him and had his baby which he had aborted against her will. She also contended that during that time Lee Harvey Oswald was also part of the group and saw him in Cuba. The book was never published due to legal reasons. I believe there was a made for TV movie based on her life or something like that.
52 posted on 09/24/2003 2:14:40 PM PDT by Hildy (SUCKER: Short-sighted Uncompromising Conservative Kool-Aid-drinking Elitist Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ET(end tyranny)
Oddly enough, we pulled out the tape 'The Men who killed Kennedy', just last night and watched it again. I wanted my son to see and hear what type of evidence had been supressed.

That is just my point...VCR's didn't exist, so our memories would fade over time.

It is kind of like the Internet.

Also, people are getting close to meeting their Maker...Death bed confessions, and all that.

53 posted on 09/24/2003 2:36:18 PM PDT by Lael (Bush to Middle Class: Send your kids to DIE in Iraq while I send your LIVELIHOODS to INDIA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl
Now where do I find "Down Side Legacy"? I am soooo dysfunctional on this stuff!

Thanks, BTW, and I ALWAYS enjoy reading your posts!
54 posted on 09/24/2003 2:52:44 PM PDT by Maria S (“I know a little bit about how White Houses work.” Hillary Clinton, 8/26/03)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Kennedy was killed Nov. 22, 1963, as the result of a massive conspiracy between the CIA-installed government of South Vietnam, the French global heroin syndicate and the New Orleans Mafia.

One of my first jobs as a solo practice attorney involved executing a sale of a vending machine route by the New Orleans mafia to my clients.

Selling cigarette machines is long way from planning and executing an assassination of the President of the United States

55 posted on 09/24/2003 3:02:18 PM PDT by bigeasy_70118
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maria S
Thank you oh so very much for the kudos and encouragements!

Here is the link to Downside Legacy at Two Degrees of President Clinton

56 posted on 09/24/2003 3:04:09 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
Tracing it to Oswald involves leaps of faith I am not willing to make.

Right.

There is only a picture of him with the gun, he ordered the gun, and he left his house on Nov. 22nd with a gun-shaped object wrapped in a blanket. Real "leap of faith."

57 posted on 09/24/2003 3:05:05 PM PDT by veronica (http://www.PetitionOnline.com/bombings/petition.html - Homicide bombings = war crimes - sign this!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
How many people have reportedly killed JFK?

The writers of these books make it sound like 200+ people out there shooting, bankrolled by thousands of people. And no one has talked. Until Now...

58 posted on 09/24/2003 3:05:39 PM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: norton
"My own belief is that Bobby "knew who killed JFK" because he was as much in on it as anyone else - the hit, if it was a hit & a conspiracy, came from inside the circle."

With all due respect, surely you don't really believe RFK had anything to do with JFK's death, do you? From all indications, he was grief-stricken about it.
59 posted on 09/24/2003 3:16:01 PM PDT by Maria S (“I know a little bit about how White Houses work.” Hillary Clinton, 8/26/03)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ET(end tyranny)
"Doubles were used and one probably died the same day."

Wow! Now I AM confused! Are you saying that JFK was NOT killed, and he was sneaked away somewhere else? I can't believe Jacqueline Kennedy wouldn't have known and recognized her own husband...and she certainly gave every indication of being grief-stricken, as did RFK.
60 posted on 09/24/2003 3:19:41 PM PDT by Maria S (“I know a little bit about how White Houses work.” Hillary Clinton, 8/26/03)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-230 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson