Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Free Republic LLC filed a Notice of Claim with the City of Fresno
Press Release Charles L. Doerksen, Attorney at Law | 09/22/03 | Jim Robinson

Posted on 09/22/2003 5:52:05 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

CHARLES L. DOERKSEN
ATTORNEY AT LAW
________________

ROWELL BUILDING
2100 Tulare Street, Suite 410
Fresno, California 93721
Telephone 559 233 3434
Facsimile 559 233 3939
E-mail doerksen@lightspeed.net

 

September 22, 2003

 

PRESS RELEASE

At 9:10 a.m. today, Free Republic LLC filed a Notice of Claim with the City of Fresno, arising from the Human Relations Commission’s news release of September 12, 2003, labeling it a "hate group." A copy of the Notice of Claim, without exhibits, is attached hereto.

The Notice of Claim, which is a legally required first step in filing a lawsuit against a public entity, puts the City of Fresno on notice that Free Republic LLC intends to file a lawsuit for defamation against (1) the City of Fresno, (2) the Human Relations Commission, and (3) Debbie Reyes, Chair of the Human Relations Commission.

Questions regarding this matter may be directed to this office, and additionally, Mr. Doerksen, as well as representatives of Free Republic LLC, can be made available in front of City Hall at 4:00 p.m., today, September 22, 2003, to answer questions if interest in this is expressed.

 

NOTICE OF CLAIM
(Government Code § 900, et seq.)

This claim is being presented pursuant to Government Code Section 900, et seq., Miller v. Hoagland (1966) 247 Cal.App.2d 57, 61-62 (filing claim as prerequisite for defamation action against public entity and its employees), and all pertinent code sections, statutes and laws of the State of California.

A. NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE CLAIMANT:

B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON TO WHOM CLAIMANT DESIRES

NOTICES TO BE SENT:

C. DATE, PLACE AND OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES GIVING RISE TO THE

CLAIM:

Claimant is an independent, grass-roots, conservative organization. Its purpose is to root out political fraud and corruption, to roll back decades of governmental largesse, and to champion causes which further conservatism in the United States of America.

This claim arises from defamatory oral statements and/or more permanent publications made by and/or disseminated by the City of Fresno, by and through its Human Relations Commission, and certain public employees and/or agents of the City of Fresno acting in the course and scope of their employment and/or agency, the identities of which are currently unknown (hereinafter, collectively the "City of Fresno"). Claimant is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that the Human Relations Commission for the City of Fresno is composed of up to 17 members appointed by the City Council and the Mayor, and has a budget for the 2003 fiscal year estimated at $193,100. Each Council member appoints two members while the Mayor appoints three members. The specific identities of such public employees/agents are currently unknown, but are expected to include, at a minimum, Debbie Reyes, Chair, Human Relations Commission for the City of Fresno.

On or about September 12, 2003, the City of Fresno disseminated a News Release entitled, "Human Relations Commission News Release," a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof (hereinafter, the "Release"). The Release refers to claimant as "a hate group." In addition, the Release states: "This group has also planned a ‘Free Republic Hate Rally Picnic’ in District 6," and accuses claimant of making "threats of violence toward any minority groups that interfere with their rally or picnic." The Release constitutes a false and unprivileged fixed representation to the eye which exposes claimant to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, causes it to be shunned or avoided, and has a tendency to injure claimant in its occupation, trade or business. In addition, the Release charges claimant with a crime in that it accuses claimant of making "threats of violence" towards minority groups.

Claimant is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that the City of Fresno has made other false and unprivileged statements, either orally or by writing, printing, or other more permanent medium, which have exposed claimant to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, and which have caused claimant to be shunned or avoided, and have injured it in its occupation, trade or business. (As used in this Notice of Claim, the term "Publication" shall hereinafter refer to the Release as well as to all other defamatory oral statements and/or more permanent publications made by and/or disseminated by the City of Fresno.)

D. CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES:

Defamation. The City of Fresno (previously defined to include the City of Fresno, and certain public employees and agents of the City of Fresno acting in the course and scope of their employment and/or agency, the identities of which are currently unknown), wrongly referred to claimant as "a hate group" and accused claimant of planning a "hate rally" and making "threats of violence toward any minority groups that interfere with their rally or picnic," notwithstanding the City of Fresno’s failure and inability to produce even a scintilla of competent evidentiary or legal support for such defamatory statements. True and correct copies of articles from The Fresno Bee, dated September 14 and 16, 2003, are attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and "C," respectively, and made a part hereof (hereinafter, the "Articles"). The Articles attribute statements to Mayor Autry that (1) there is no evidence that claimant is a hate group, (2) the Human Relations Commission is "using the City of Fresno as a tool to attack people without cause," (3) describing the Publications as "inflammatory, reckless, irresponsible and dangerous," and (4) explaining "the worst thing you can say is they’re a hate group." Furthermore, Debbie Reyes, Chair, Human Relations Commission for the City of Fresno, has admitted that her "proof" for making the Publications was not "solid." (See Fresno Bee article dated September 16, 2003.)

The Publications are false and unprivileged statements, either orally or by writing, printing, or other more permanent medium, which have exposed claimant to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, and which have caused claimant to be shunned or avoided, and have injured it in its occupation, trade or business. As a result of the defamatory Publications, claimant is entitled to be compensated by the City of Fresno (and the responsible public employees/agents).

The Publications constitute defamation (i.e. libel and/or slander per se) based upon Civil Code Sections 45 and 46 (as well as other statutory and judicial authority):

    1. Libel. The California Legislature has defined libel as a "false and unprivileged publication by writing, printing, picture, effigy, or other fixed representation to the eye, which exposes any person to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, or which causes him to be shunned or avoided, or which has a tendency to injure him in his occupation." (Cal. Civ. Code § 45.)

    2. Slander. The California Legislature has defined slander as "a false and unprivileged publication, orally uttered, and also communications by radio or any mechanical or other means which: (1) Charges any person with crime, or with having been indicted, convicted, or punished for crime; … (3) Tends directly to injure him in respect to his office, profession, trade or business, either by imputing to him general disqualification in those respects which the office or other occupation peculiarly requires, or by imputing something with reference to his office, profession, trade, or business that has a natural tendency to lessen its profits." (Cal. Civ. Code § 46.)

E. AMOUNT OF CLAIM:

Claimant seeks general damages for loss of reputation, shame and mortification. Claimant seeks special damages with respect to damages it has suffered to its business, trade, profession or occupation. Finally, claimant requests exemplary damages for the sake of example and by way of punishing the responsible public employees/agents for making the defamatory Publications with actual malice. Claimant is informed and believes, and thereon alleges that the public employees/agents possessed a state of mind arising from the ill will toward the claimant, and did not have a good faith belief in the truth of the defamatory Publications. Accordingly, the acts of public employees were made with actual malice, and were fraudulent and justify the imposition of punitive damages.

Claimant’s damages are currently unknown, but are anticipated to be well in excess of $1,000,000, but regardless, are in excess of the minimal jurisdictional limits of an unlimited civil case.

F. WITNESSES/PUBLIC EMPLOYEE(S) CAUSING INJURY:

At this time, claimant believes that the following persons, in addition to its members (including but not limited to Jim Robinson), would have knowledge regarding the events of this claim and/or participated in the acts and/or omissions which caused the injury to claimant:

Dated: September ___, 2003



TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Announcements; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: banglist; cityoffresno; claim; debbiereyes; freerepublic; fresno; fresnosuit; hategroup; hrc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 701-710 next last
To: Jim Robinson
PRAYERS...

On their way to GOD'S Throne Room.

PRAYING FOR V I C T O R Y IN JESUS' NAME!

421 posted on 09/23/2003 2:56:42 AM PDT by Simcha7 (The Plumb - Line has been Drawn, T'shuvah/Return for The Kingdom of HaShem is at hand!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne
ATTA BOY, JIM. SHOW THEM WHO'S THE BOSS!!!!!!
422 posted on 09/23/2003 3:05:16 AM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: autoresponder
Great work fixing that pic up ! Thanks for helping to expose those jerks ! ...

Here is a link to the SF-IMC site where these FAR LEFT LIBERALS posted that pic of one of their Support Saddam/Terrorists events recently and changed the image when I posted/linked it to an FR thread. The pic at the top of that link of 2 Allied Soldiers transporting a prisoner to Gitmo was what they changed it to . . .

Another little tidbit, speaking of anti-Iraqi Freedom folks!:



423 posted on 09/23/2003 3:26:55 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Check out the Texas Chicken D 'RATS!: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/keyword/Redistricting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Let us know if we can do anything to help.

5.56mm

424 posted on 09/23/2003 3:48:27 AM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Freep being called a hate group by people in San Fran? No way!
425 posted on 09/23/2003 3:50:40 AM PDT by scabbage (if Huey Lewis and Stevie Ray Vaughn made a record, could you tell who was singing?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Bump
426 posted on 09/23/2003 4:06:17 AM PDT by umgud (gov't has more money than it needs, but never as much as it wants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

"Ex-cell-ent!"


427 posted on 09/23/2003 4:06:48 AM PDT by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Bump again.
428 posted on 09/23/2003 4:13:28 AM PDT by Rocko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chookter; Jim Robinson
Cry "Havoc!" And let slip the Dogs of War!

Quotes from Henry V are always good. Here's another.

We few, we happy few, we band of brothers.

Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)

LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)

429 posted on 09/23/2003 4:40:24 AM PDT by LonePalm (Commander and Chef)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Comment #430 Removed by Moderator

To: Jim Robinson
¡Viva JimRob! Good for you!
431 posted on 09/23/2003 4:45:43 AM PDT by mombonn (¡Viva Bush/Cheney!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Thanks for the ping. I pinged you to this thread too. One good ping deserves another.
432 posted on 09/23/2003 4:49:47 AM PDT by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies]

To: Dog
I pinged you to this thread last night but think it got lost in all the traffic of the Live thread.
433 posted on 09/23/2003 4:55:31 AM PDT by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; nutmeg; RaceBannon
Go get 'em Jim!!

Nutmeg & Race Bannon, would you please ping the connecticut state ping list, I think this is worth sharing.
434 posted on 09/23/2003 5:01:07 AM PDT by ctlpdad (If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim
Well said, sir. This is excellent news!
435 posted on 09/23/2003 5:10:31 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Here are my further thoughts on this subject.

For those who are choosing to question the reasoning behind this action, the reason why this is being addressed is because a lot of people associated with this organization have had their future put at risk by the reckless and irresponsibe action of Fresno HRC.

Clearly, this is one of cases where you have those who simply don't like the things that people like you and I stand for and have some very malicious and harmful intentions towards us and these sorry, lazy miserable good for nothing pieces of garbage need to be made examples of.

This kind of B.S. and C.F. is the reason why you don't see a whole of freepers identify themselves instead choosing to use screenames for this message board. If something could be done to stop this nonsense, then maybe more of us would be able to identify ourselves and say that we are part of this movement to advance the cause of conservatism without the fear of retribution of losing friends or customers.

So, to repeat my first post,
ATTA BOY JIM, SHOW THEM WHO'S THE BOSS!!!!!!!

436 posted on 09/23/2003 5:10:34 AM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Good for you Jim! As a lawyer, I think it's ironic to hear so many people on this forum telling you to sue 'em for all their worth. These are the same people who ridicule others who seek legal redress and lament the state of our legal system. I for one believe the legal system works; it's not perfect, but what is? I hope the people here who are cheering you on remember this the next time they hear of a suit that sounds stupid to them. We don't always know the facts, and just because one doesn't agree with the person suing doesn't mean that person or lawyer is "abusing the system." Again, good luck. This sounds outrageous.
437 posted on 09/23/2003 5:19:22 AM PDT by Nashphil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TankerKC
"what would we say about another group making these claims?"

That is the point in a nutshell. 'Another group' threatens
violence against a peaceful, lawful gathering, and by stating that some would DEFEND themselves against this attack, a mentally vacant public official declares FR a 'hate group'! When will the instigators be called out?
Why haven't the FReepwatch threads calling for assault been
publicized? I think making the rest of this story public
would do more for our cause than a lawsuit. Let the people
see what these so-called tollerant liberals really think!

438 posted on 09/23/2003 5:41:25 AM PDT by bk1000 (one of these days I simply MUST come up with a decent tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Hmmm? I have been using "self censored" for years, but I don't like it, and personally, the mod form of censorship leaves a lot to he desired. An example appeared just the other day on a thread where reply x was deleted, but was repeated in italics just a little further down the page. I always feel like I have beaten the system when I manage to see a reply before it is erased by well meaning mods, and I save them for my own edification. When the internet begins to suffer the same lawsuit based legal system the rest of the country suffers from then what is the next avenue for truth, as we know it, want it, see it, or as it really is. Jim has already suffered through that idiotic LAT and WP lawsuit, which in my opinion should have been thrown out of court, but this comment is not about law suits, but about the necessity for self censorship, mod censorship, or being reasonable versus emotional, and the answer is...?
439 posted on 09/23/2003 5:55:23 AM PDT by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: notpoliticallycorewrecked
Well I had better at least try get some sleep or I will be a cranky person tomorrow. No comments from you Chads

Whhuuut - me make a comment about you being cranky- never - never, I have already used my " get out of the doghouse free card " and I didn't make copies of it.

440 posted on 09/23/2003 6:08:51 AM PDT by chadsworth (Hillary MUST BE STOPPED BEFORE 2004 ; Davis MUST BE REMOVED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 411 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 701-710 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson