Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Free Republic LLC filed a Notice of Claim with the City of Fresno
Press Release Charles L. Doerksen, Attorney at Law | 09/22/03 | Jim Robinson

Posted on 09/22/2003 5:52:05 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

CHARLES L. DOERKSEN
ATTORNEY AT LAW
________________

ROWELL BUILDING
2100 Tulare Street, Suite 410
Fresno, California 93721
Telephone 559 233 3434
Facsimile 559 233 3939
E-mail doerksen@lightspeed.net

 

September 22, 2003

 

PRESS RELEASE

At 9:10 a.m. today, Free Republic LLC filed a Notice of Claim with the City of Fresno, arising from the Human Relations Commission’s news release of September 12, 2003, labeling it a "hate group." A copy of the Notice of Claim, without exhibits, is attached hereto.

The Notice of Claim, which is a legally required first step in filing a lawsuit against a public entity, puts the City of Fresno on notice that Free Republic LLC intends to file a lawsuit for defamation against (1) the City of Fresno, (2) the Human Relations Commission, and (3) Debbie Reyes, Chair of the Human Relations Commission.

Questions regarding this matter may be directed to this office, and additionally, Mr. Doerksen, as well as representatives of Free Republic LLC, can be made available in front of City Hall at 4:00 p.m., today, September 22, 2003, to answer questions if interest in this is expressed.

 

NOTICE OF CLAIM
(Government Code § 900, et seq.)

This claim is being presented pursuant to Government Code Section 900, et seq., Miller v. Hoagland (1966) 247 Cal.App.2d 57, 61-62 (filing claim as prerequisite for defamation action against public entity and its employees), and all pertinent code sections, statutes and laws of the State of California.

A. NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE CLAIMANT:

B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON TO WHOM CLAIMANT DESIRES

NOTICES TO BE SENT:

C. DATE, PLACE AND OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES GIVING RISE TO THE

CLAIM:

Claimant is an independent, grass-roots, conservative organization. Its purpose is to root out political fraud and corruption, to roll back decades of governmental largesse, and to champion causes which further conservatism in the United States of America.

This claim arises from defamatory oral statements and/or more permanent publications made by and/or disseminated by the City of Fresno, by and through its Human Relations Commission, and certain public employees and/or agents of the City of Fresno acting in the course and scope of their employment and/or agency, the identities of which are currently unknown (hereinafter, collectively the "City of Fresno"). Claimant is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that the Human Relations Commission for the City of Fresno is composed of up to 17 members appointed by the City Council and the Mayor, and has a budget for the 2003 fiscal year estimated at $193,100. Each Council member appoints two members while the Mayor appoints three members. The specific identities of such public employees/agents are currently unknown, but are expected to include, at a minimum, Debbie Reyes, Chair, Human Relations Commission for the City of Fresno.

On or about September 12, 2003, the City of Fresno disseminated a News Release entitled, "Human Relations Commission News Release," a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof (hereinafter, the "Release"). The Release refers to claimant as "a hate group." In addition, the Release states: "This group has also planned a ‘Free Republic Hate Rally Picnic’ in District 6," and accuses claimant of making "threats of violence toward any minority groups that interfere with their rally or picnic." The Release constitutes a false and unprivileged fixed representation to the eye which exposes claimant to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, causes it to be shunned or avoided, and has a tendency to injure claimant in its occupation, trade or business. In addition, the Release charges claimant with a crime in that it accuses claimant of making "threats of violence" towards minority groups.

Claimant is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that the City of Fresno has made other false and unprivileged statements, either orally or by writing, printing, or other more permanent medium, which have exposed claimant to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, and which have caused claimant to be shunned or avoided, and have injured it in its occupation, trade or business. (As used in this Notice of Claim, the term "Publication" shall hereinafter refer to the Release as well as to all other defamatory oral statements and/or more permanent publications made by and/or disseminated by the City of Fresno.)

D. CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES:

Defamation. The City of Fresno (previously defined to include the City of Fresno, and certain public employees and agents of the City of Fresno acting in the course and scope of their employment and/or agency, the identities of which are currently unknown), wrongly referred to claimant as "a hate group" and accused claimant of planning a "hate rally" and making "threats of violence toward any minority groups that interfere with their rally or picnic," notwithstanding the City of Fresno’s failure and inability to produce even a scintilla of competent evidentiary or legal support for such defamatory statements. True and correct copies of articles from The Fresno Bee, dated September 14 and 16, 2003, are attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and "C," respectively, and made a part hereof (hereinafter, the "Articles"). The Articles attribute statements to Mayor Autry that (1) there is no evidence that claimant is a hate group, (2) the Human Relations Commission is "using the City of Fresno as a tool to attack people without cause," (3) describing the Publications as "inflammatory, reckless, irresponsible and dangerous," and (4) explaining "the worst thing you can say is they’re a hate group." Furthermore, Debbie Reyes, Chair, Human Relations Commission for the City of Fresno, has admitted that her "proof" for making the Publications was not "solid." (See Fresno Bee article dated September 16, 2003.)

The Publications are false and unprivileged statements, either orally or by writing, printing, or other more permanent medium, which have exposed claimant to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, and which have caused claimant to be shunned or avoided, and have injured it in its occupation, trade or business. As a result of the defamatory Publications, claimant is entitled to be compensated by the City of Fresno (and the responsible public employees/agents).

The Publications constitute defamation (i.e. libel and/or slander per se) based upon Civil Code Sections 45 and 46 (as well as other statutory and judicial authority):

    1. Libel. The California Legislature has defined libel as a "false and unprivileged publication by writing, printing, picture, effigy, or other fixed representation to the eye, which exposes any person to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, or which causes him to be shunned or avoided, or which has a tendency to injure him in his occupation." (Cal. Civ. Code § 45.)

    2. Slander. The California Legislature has defined slander as "a false and unprivileged publication, orally uttered, and also communications by radio or any mechanical or other means which: (1) Charges any person with crime, or with having been indicted, convicted, or punished for crime; … (3) Tends directly to injure him in respect to his office, profession, trade or business, either by imputing to him general disqualification in those respects which the office or other occupation peculiarly requires, or by imputing something with reference to his office, profession, trade, or business that has a natural tendency to lessen its profits." (Cal. Civ. Code § 46.)

E. AMOUNT OF CLAIM:

Claimant seeks general damages for loss of reputation, shame and mortification. Claimant seeks special damages with respect to damages it has suffered to its business, trade, profession or occupation. Finally, claimant requests exemplary damages for the sake of example and by way of punishing the responsible public employees/agents for making the defamatory Publications with actual malice. Claimant is informed and believes, and thereon alleges that the public employees/agents possessed a state of mind arising from the ill will toward the claimant, and did not have a good faith belief in the truth of the defamatory Publications. Accordingly, the acts of public employees were made with actual malice, and were fraudulent and justify the imposition of punitive damages.

Claimant’s damages are currently unknown, but are anticipated to be well in excess of $1,000,000, but regardless, are in excess of the minimal jurisdictional limits of an unlimited civil case.

F. WITNESSES/PUBLIC EMPLOYEE(S) CAUSING INJURY:

At this time, claimant believes that the following persons, in addition to its members (including but not limited to Jim Robinson), would have knowledge regarding the events of this claim and/or participated in the acts and/or omissions which caused the injury to claimant:

Dated: September ___, 2003



TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Announcements; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: banglist; cityoffresno; claim; debbiereyes; freerepublic; fresno; fresnosuit; hategroup; hrc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 701-710 next last
To: Jim Robinson
Thank you for this site and for standing up to those that fear debate and freedom of thought.

381 posted on 09/22/2003 10:30:24 PM PDT by Kay Soze (If punch card voting is not legal than Davis is not the Gov and Gore did not win California!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CarolAnn; Jim Robinson
You know I was just wondering.... I wonder if any of this is a "pay back" for all that FReeping of Gary Condit. I wonder if anyone on HRC is connected to him....
382 posted on 09/22/2003 10:31:54 PM PDT by Humidston (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: MistyCA
The entire city should be outraged by what was done in this case

Hi Misty. Judging by the reaction of the motorists passing by our rally last Friday, I think many Fresnans are outraged. It seemed to me that they were even more exuberant in their honking and their thumbs up than they have been. Others at our rally noticed it too, along with the fact that many of our biggest supporters honking and waving were minorities. They KNOW who we are and what we are about. We've been out there on that corner almost every Friday night for two years.

It will be interesting to see how this plays out in the months to come. I have heard excellent things about Mr. Doerksen, the attorney handling this case, and I have hope that when it's all said and done, the people of Fresno will come out the winners in the long run. They deserve much better for their tax dollar than the representation they've been getting.

383 posted on 09/22/2003 10:36:20 PM PDT by Mama_Bear ( Lori)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Good luck.

However, the only thing I would like to add is in the interest of not advancing the litigious society that you not ask for an outrageous sum of money in damages, so as not to overburden the already overburdened taxpayer. A written formal apology from the city, termination of said loudmouth, legal fees, and one dollar in damages would be good compensation IMO. If you want to go for big bucks that is your business, of course. Advice is dangerous, worthless, or both.
384 posted on 09/22/2003 10:38:16 PM PDT by Liberal Classic (Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; Congressman Billybob; AnnaZ
I'm on your side. Keep us updated on the costs. Apology, firing and legal fees seems minimal.
385 posted on 09/22/2003 10:39:55 PM PDT by jokar (Beware the White European Male Christian theological complex !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mama_Bear
I second that!
See, we can learn parliamentary procedure if we are forced to! :-)
386 posted on 09/22/2003 10:40:19 PM PDT by ladyinred (The left have blood on their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
Thought this needed repeating.

Their hypocrisy is showing? These people are truly sick puppies. Their minds are like gated communities; they will only allow in information that fits their preconceived biases, but will allow anything out. AND we're supposed to take it at face value. Their level of denial has to be monumental; or they're consummate liars.

In any case, there are far too many of 'em running around loose, spraying their utopian drivel on the rest of us. God help us!

FGS

387 posted on 09/22/2003 10:40:30 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Right on JR!!

It's time to call these dimwitted scumbags on the carpet.

Good luck!

388 posted on 09/22/2003 10:41:33 PM PDT by kstewskis (156 more days until Lent and The Passion is released....and no I'm NOT giving up Mel for Lent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
BUMP
389 posted on 09/22/2003 10:42:41 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
Is that all? A Starbuck's?

Well, it was a "Venti", after all. ;-)

(If you haven't had their iced caramel machiato, you don't know what you are missing. They are wonderful!, but Haggen Dazs is pretty darned good too.)

390 posted on 09/22/2003 10:43:46 PM PDT by Mama_Bear ( Lori)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
I second that!

Ah ha! You know parliamentary procedure....I KNEW it! (Better watch it, lady........when my term is up (the end of October, isn't it?) you could be next. ;-)

391 posted on 09/22/2003 10:50:32 PM PDT by Mama_Bear ( Lori)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 386 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Saw this on the 10 o'clock news tonight. Hit 'em where it hurts!
392 posted on 09/22/2003 10:59:07 PM PDT by Penner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
Nothing like being a day late and a dollar short.

Oh, well I beat the world's land speed record between work and home and then on to city hall. NOT! If I had done that I would have been able to make it on time.
393 posted on 09/22/2003 11:02:37 PM PDT by notpoliticallycorewrecked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
I'm repeating this because it may have some merit... Two words:

GARY CONDIT CONNECTION??

394 posted on 09/22/2003 11:08:39 PM PDT by Humidston (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 382 | View Replies]

To: Humidston
Tehee... I added another word upon preview.
395 posted on 09/22/2003 11:14:24 PM PDT by Humidston (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 394 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Fantastic!

I see Jim Robinson as Admiral Dewey, giving the order to battle with the Spanish fleet:

" You may fire when you are ready, Gridley."

396 posted on 09/22/2003 11:17:36 PM PDT by Crowcreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
How do you stay so slim eating ice cream and tri tip? I look at food and gain weight. If I smell it I gain twice as much, and if I eat it, well nevermind .....
397 posted on 09/22/2003 11:20:43 PM PDT by notpoliticallycorewrecked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 380 | View Replies]

To: Mama_Bear
"when it's all said and done, the people of Fresno will come out the winners"

Yes! Clean out that little rat nest "Human Relations Commission" before it does any more damage to your fine city.

398 posted on 09/22/2003 11:20:51 PM PDT by Crowcreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Oh! Do I ever love it! This lawsuit is one of the most richly deserved 'just desserts' for the ever loud-mouthed and ever-oppressing Left wing socialists who seem to infest our governments from city to National.

Jim, I know you are very measured in your actions, and I am tickled that you are challenging this slap at you and FReeRepublic.

To All: Methinks a few local socialist/dumrats are saying something like ......"Oh! Cr*p!" heh heh

Nam Vet

399 posted on 09/22/2003 11:28:26 PM PDT by Nam Vet (It may be that your sole purpose in life is simply to serve as a warning to others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
Don't back down!! You go, girl!!

Hi Sis.....thanks for your encouragement. I always want you on MY side. LOL.

400 posted on 09/22/2003 11:33:40 PM PDT by Mama_Bear ( Lori)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 701-710 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson