Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Free Republic LLC filed a Notice of Claim with the City of Fresno
Press Release Charles L. Doerksen, Attorney at Law | 09/22/03 | Jim Robinson

Posted on 09/22/2003 5:52:05 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

CHARLES L. DOERKSEN
ATTORNEY AT LAW
________________

ROWELL BUILDING
2100 Tulare Street, Suite 410
Fresno, California 93721
Telephone 559 233 3434
Facsimile 559 233 3939
E-mail doerksen@lightspeed.net

 

September 22, 2003

 

PRESS RELEASE

At 9:10 a.m. today, Free Republic LLC filed a Notice of Claim with the City of Fresno, arising from the Human Relations Commission’s news release of September 12, 2003, labeling it a "hate group." A copy of the Notice of Claim, without exhibits, is attached hereto.

The Notice of Claim, which is a legally required first step in filing a lawsuit against a public entity, puts the City of Fresno on notice that Free Republic LLC intends to file a lawsuit for defamation against (1) the City of Fresno, (2) the Human Relations Commission, and (3) Debbie Reyes, Chair of the Human Relations Commission.

Questions regarding this matter may be directed to this office, and additionally, Mr. Doerksen, as well as representatives of Free Republic LLC, can be made available in front of City Hall at 4:00 p.m., today, September 22, 2003, to answer questions if interest in this is expressed.

 

NOTICE OF CLAIM
(Government Code § 900, et seq.)

This claim is being presented pursuant to Government Code Section 900, et seq., Miller v. Hoagland (1966) 247 Cal.App.2d 57, 61-62 (filing claim as prerequisite for defamation action against public entity and its employees), and all pertinent code sections, statutes and laws of the State of California.

A. NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE CLAIMANT:

B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON TO WHOM CLAIMANT DESIRES

NOTICES TO BE SENT:

C. DATE, PLACE AND OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES GIVING RISE TO THE

CLAIM:

Claimant is an independent, grass-roots, conservative organization. Its purpose is to root out political fraud and corruption, to roll back decades of governmental largesse, and to champion causes which further conservatism in the United States of America.

This claim arises from defamatory oral statements and/or more permanent publications made by and/or disseminated by the City of Fresno, by and through its Human Relations Commission, and certain public employees and/or agents of the City of Fresno acting in the course and scope of their employment and/or agency, the identities of which are currently unknown (hereinafter, collectively the "City of Fresno"). Claimant is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that the Human Relations Commission for the City of Fresno is composed of up to 17 members appointed by the City Council and the Mayor, and has a budget for the 2003 fiscal year estimated at $193,100. Each Council member appoints two members while the Mayor appoints three members. The specific identities of such public employees/agents are currently unknown, but are expected to include, at a minimum, Debbie Reyes, Chair, Human Relations Commission for the City of Fresno.

On or about September 12, 2003, the City of Fresno disseminated a News Release entitled, "Human Relations Commission News Release," a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof (hereinafter, the "Release"). The Release refers to claimant as "a hate group." In addition, the Release states: "This group has also planned a ‘Free Republic Hate Rally Picnic’ in District 6," and accuses claimant of making "threats of violence toward any minority groups that interfere with their rally or picnic." The Release constitutes a false and unprivileged fixed representation to the eye which exposes claimant to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, causes it to be shunned or avoided, and has a tendency to injure claimant in its occupation, trade or business. In addition, the Release charges claimant with a crime in that it accuses claimant of making "threats of violence" towards minority groups.

Claimant is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that the City of Fresno has made other false and unprivileged statements, either orally or by writing, printing, or other more permanent medium, which have exposed claimant to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, and which have caused claimant to be shunned or avoided, and have injured it in its occupation, trade or business. (As used in this Notice of Claim, the term "Publication" shall hereinafter refer to the Release as well as to all other defamatory oral statements and/or more permanent publications made by and/or disseminated by the City of Fresno.)

D. CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES:

Defamation. The City of Fresno (previously defined to include the City of Fresno, and certain public employees and agents of the City of Fresno acting in the course and scope of their employment and/or agency, the identities of which are currently unknown), wrongly referred to claimant as "a hate group" and accused claimant of planning a "hate rally" and making "threats of violence toward any minority groups that interfere with their rally or picnic," notwithstanding the City of Fresno’s failure and inability to produce even a scintilla of competent evidentiary or legal support for such defamatory statements. True and correct copies of articles from The Fresno Bee, dated September 14 and 16, 2003, are attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and "C," respectively, and made a part hereof (hereinafter, the "Articles"). The Articles attribute statements to Mayor Autry that (1) there is no evidence that claimant is a hate group, (2) the Human Relations Commission is "using the City of Fresno as a tool to attack people without cause," (3) describing the Publications as "inflammatory, reckless, irresponsible and dangerous," and (4) explaining "the worst thing you can say is they’re a hate group." Furthermore, Debbie Reyes, Chair, Human Relations Commission for the City of Fresno, has admitted that her "proof" for making the Publications was not "solid." (See Fresno Bee article dated September 16, 2003.)

The Publications are false and unprivileged statements, either orally or by writing, printing, or other more permanent medium, which have exposed claimant to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, and which have caused claimant to be shunned or avoided, and have injured it in its occupation, trade or business. As a result of the defamatory Publications, claimant is entitled to be compensated by the City of Fresno (and the responsible public employees/agents).

The Publications constitute defamation (i.e. libel and/or slander per se) based upon Civil Code Sections 45 and 46 (as well as other statutory and judicial authority):

    1. Libel. The California Legislature has defined libel as a "false and unprivileged publication by writing, printing, picture, effigy, or other fixed representation to the eye, which exposes any person to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, or which causes him to be shunned or avoided, or which has a tendency to injure him in his occupation." (Cal. Civ. Code § 45.)

    2. Slander. The California Legislature has defined slander as "a false and unprivileged publication, orally uttered, and also communications by radio or any mechanical or other means which: (1) Charges any person with crime, or with having been indicted, convicted, or punished for crime; … (3) Tends directly to injure him in respect to his office, profession, trade or business, either by imputing to him general disqualification in those respects which the office or other occupation peculiarly requires, or by imputing something with reference to his office, profession, trade, or business that has a natural tendency to lessen its profits." (Cal. Civ. Code § 46.)

E. AMOUNT OF CLAIM:

Claimant seeks general damages for loss of reputation, shame and mortification. Claimant seeks special damages with respect to damages it has suffered to its business, trade, profession or occupation. Finally, claimant requests exemplary damages for the sake of example and by way of punishing the responsible public employees/agents for making the defamatory Publications with actual malice. Claimant is informed and believes, and thereon alleges that the public employees/agents possessed a state of mind arising from the ill will toward the claimant, and did not have a good faith belief in the truth of the defamatory Publications. Accordingly, the acts of public employees were made with actual malice, and were fraudulent and justify the imposition of punitive damages.

Claimant’s damages are currently unknown, but are anticipated to be well in excess of $1,000,000, but regardless, are in excess of the minimal jurisdictional limits of an unlimited civil case.

F. WITNESSES/PUBLIC EMPLOYEE(S) CAUSING INJURY:

At this time, claimant believes that the following persons, in addition to its members (including but not limited to Jim Robinson), would have knowledge regarding the events of this claim and/or participated in the acts and/or omissions which caused the injury to claimant:

Dated: September ___, 2003



TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Announcements; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: banglist; cityoffresno; claim; debbiereyes; freerepublic; fresno; fresnosuit; hategroup; hrc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 701-710 next last
To: Jim Robinson
Jim, if you win 10 million bucks I suggest that you set up a program to pay for 5 people to freep Hillary 24/7 for the rest of her life. Even when she is 88 years old, I want freeper out on the street in front of her house.
121 posted on 09/22/2003 6:31:10 PM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Outstanding.


122 posted on 09/22/2003 6:32:41 PM PDT by rdb3 (I write my life; you write what you've seen in gangsta moviez)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Good Luck!!! .. What they did was so wrong
123 posted on 09/22/2003 6:33:36 PM PDT by Mo1 (http://www.favewavs.com/wavs/cartoons/spdemocrats.wav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
COOL! Go for it.
124 posted on 09/22/2003 6:33:38 PM PDT by tazman3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Awesome. Take no prisoners.
125 posted on 09/22/2003 6:34:01 PM PDT by Sloth ("I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!" -- Jacobim Mugatu, 'Zoolander')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Saw this mentioned on Channel 24 on both the 5 and 6 o'clock news.
126 posted on 09/22/2003 6:34:18 PM PDT by Chesterbelloc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
You should send this to every Mayor, City Manager and County Administrator in Calif to put them on notice to rein in these Left Wing Wacko commishioners...
127 posted on 09/22/2003 6:34:18 PM PDT by tubebender (FReeRepublic...How bad have you got it...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Good! Go for it. At least get Debbie Reyes job.
128 posted on 09/22/2003 6:34:57 PM PDT by SAMWolf (Click...click...click...damn, out of taglines!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
He doesn't need to pay anyone. Most of the Freepers I associate with will do it simply for the privildge of knowing that they caused grief in her life.
129 posted on 09/22/2003 6:35:01 PM PDT by notpoliticallycorewrecked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
Even when she is 88 years old, I want freeper out on the street in front of her house.

LOL! I can just see Dr. Raoul chasing her down the street, both of them using walkers!

130 posted on 09/22/2003 6:35:25 PM PDT by Tijeras_Slim (Sue Fresno!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Yes!
131 posted on 09/22/2003 6:35:36 PM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Thank you for having the onions to go after these leftist thugs. Too often conservatives "turn the other cheek" and refuse to respond because we are fearful of damaging our well-deserved dignity. However, in this case, you are not only defending yourself and FR, but all those who come here to find an oasis of sanity and truth.

May you emerge victorious and these sickening people be exposed as the true "hate group".

God Bless.

Doc Thorne

132 posted on 09/22/2003 6:35:56 PM PDT by Dr. Thorne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CanisRex; Peach
Ms. Reyes seems to have been spanked publicly pretty hard

I haven't heard of an honest to goodness tar and feathering lately, did I miss it? ;-)

Peach - Thanks for the Ping!

133 posted on 09/22/2003 6:36:13 PM PDT by StriperSniper (The slippery slope is getting steeper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
You mean I am in the Doghouse with the Admin Moderator AND I am a member of a hate group?

Is this a great country or what?

Best regards,

134 posted on 09/22/2003 6:36:44 PM PDT by Copernicus (A Constitutional Republic revolves around Sovereign Citizens, not citizens around government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StriperSniper
You're welcome and I must have missed her "spanking" too.
135 posted on 09/22/2003 6:37:33 PM PDT by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

Comment #136 Removed by Moderator

To: Jim Robinson
Smokin!
137 posted on 09/22/2003 6:38:10 PM PDT by Petronski (I'm not always cranky.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sparkles
PING
138 posted on 09/22/2003 6:38:12 PM PDT by tazman3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Here is another guy you may want to put on your witness list (heheheheh):
God Bless Debbie Reyes! (freerepublic is a hate group)

Who says:

"...Constantly making death threats against my users, in fact, IMHO, it's the preferred method of intimidation on the part of FreeRepublic members...."

"...The FBI will really be hating the day I testify to the Senate Committee on the Judiciary on how many of such death threats have gone undealt-with at the FBI...."

139 posted on 09/22/2003 6:38:29 PM PDT by HighWheeler (Death and taxes are inevitable, but at least death doesn't get worse every year.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Bump To The Top

Good Luck, Jim!

140 posted on 09/22/2003 6:38:37 PM PDT by genew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 701-710 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson