Skip to comments.
MSNBC- Recall election to be delayed
Pete Williams MSNBC ^
| Pete Williams
Posted on 09/15/2003 10:18:32 AM PDT by Ragirl
California Appeals Court - Recall should be blocked!!!
(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: 2003election; 9thcircuit; 9thcircuitcourt; circus; circustent; davisrecalleelection; democrap; dirtytricks; election2003; floriduhagain; graydavis; impeachthe9th; outofcontrol; recall; thefixisin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280, 281-300, 301-320 ... 801-811 next last
To: Political Junkie Too
"He's probably comparing this to the New Jersey case where the Supreme Court did not take that case. Does that make it harder for them to now take up a California election case when it refused to take up a New Jersey election case? How about the fact that the NJ case was a state-wide election for a federal position while this is a state-wide election for a state position?" Both NJ and FL in 2000 involved STATE supreme courts. This decision by a panel of the 9th Circuit IS a federal matter already. That's why SCOTUS almost HAS to take it.
Michael
To: AntiGuv
Nice try, but the "equal protection" portion
Bush v Gore applied to the different treatment to be given different ballots cast using the same method applied not by state legislature (the party that is Constitutionally-charged with setting the rules of a Presidential election), but a state court changing the rules after the election was run in order to effect a different result.
This, on the other hand, is trying to declare that because some jurisdictions (which just happen to be the most-reliably Democratic ones) still use punch-card ballots (which are still legal in California), those ballots are by definition treated differently because they realize they can't gin up enough "no" votes to save Gray-Out Davis and they fear they can't gin up enough votes for Bustamonte to get him in in that eventuality.
282
posted on
09/15/2003 11:07:15 AM PDT
by
steveegg
(I have one thing to say to the big spenders; BLIZZARD OF RECALL TOUR!)
To: Peach
Brit Hume was on just now doing a beautiful job of articulating that the judges job is to interpret and apply the LAW. Not to decide what is in the best interests of the public. Brit was great.
I'm nauseous about this. Going to have to step out for a while.
Time for us to start screaming as hard as the libs do. Flood the media with letters etc.
Prairie
283
posted on
09/15/2003 11:07:19 AM PDT
by
prairiebreeze
(Brought to you by The American Democratic Party, also known as Al Qaeda, Western Division.)
To: Ragirl
CA Supreme Court rules Dems too dumb to vote.
284
posted on
09/15/2003 11:07:43 AM PDT
by
Gothmog
To: Sabertooth
Not if the recall elecion is pushed to March of 2004. That is the presidential primary election, where EVERY Democrat will be at the polls, voting for their favorite Democrat presidential candidate. The GOP timed the submission of the recall papers specifically to avoid the March election. This is a HUGE win for the Democrats. No, if the Recall is delayed until March, it will share a ballot with the referendum to overturn the Illegal Alien drivers' licenses and a racist MEChA seperatist, as well as eight or nine Democrat Presidential candidates who've promised to Amnesty Illegals if elected. Illegal Aliens will be the central issue on the March Primary in California, in the face of a furious electorate.
also why isn't Bustamonte being called to task for SUPPORTING THE VIOLENT OVERTHROW OF CALIFORNIA?
To: Tree of Liberty
if the consequences are that we give the Dems an issue to use against Bush, so we can get rid of Davis, that's hardly worth it.
To: Ragirl
Add this to the mix: The Texas State Senate was shut down today as they considered redistricting during their 3rd special session. Too many protesters interrupting the proceedings.
My patience is wearing thin. . . . .
287
posted on
09/15/2003 11:07:55 AM PDT
by
TexasNative2000
(You may disagree with me, but I will fight for your right to be in error.)
To: justshe
288
posted on
09/15/2003 11:08:06 AM PDT
by
mhking
(Laugh while you can, monkey boy...)
To: A_Niceguy_in_CA
I just heard on KFBK News Talk Radio here in Sacramento that only a 3 member panel made this decision! It wasn't even the full court. Didn't say which 3, but I'll bet they're heavy Dufus Butt Kissers!
To: truthandlife
Even this stupid 9th circuit court cited international ramifications, i.e, how can we call for free elections outside the US when we don't have them here? Utter nonsense but such is the court system.
It's totally broke.
290
posted on
09/15/2003 11:08:07 AM PDT
by
Wphile
(Keep the UN out of Iraq)
To: Sabertooth
Sabertooth...I pray you are right.
Red
To: Wphile
--The question now is whether the SCOTUS will take it. I doubt they will.--
Did the NJ case set the mold?
292
posted on
09/15/2003 11:08:11 AM PDT
by
fml
To: A_Niceguy_in_CA; Congressman Billybob
It matters little what the composition of the Ninth Circus panel is; just know that it was enough to kill the election. That is what this is all about, killing the Recall until March.
What should be done is the following: Schwarzenegger, McClintock, and Issa should file a joint emergency request for a Writ to the SCOTUS. My assumption is that the SCOTUS, having been at the center of controversy once, will decline any writs and not hear the case. In this case, I disagree with Billybob.
Assuming that happens, I would urge both Republicans to jointly withdraw from the election under protest and not participate in a fixed game. Nothing is gained by the Republican candidates granting any legitimacy to this scam. I would also recommend that the Republicans scream "fix" and "scam" at the top of thier lungs.
Be Seeing You,
Chris
293
posted on
09/15/2003 11:08:11 AM PDT
by
section9
(To read my blog, click on the Major!)
To: A_Niceguy_in_CA
Yes, I am on record that I expected the Ninth Circuit to say yes to the election, to prevent itself from being embarrassed one more time by being slapped down by the Supreme Court. Now, it is time for another dose of embarrassment. Spread the shame with a trowel, this time.
John / Billybob
294
posted on
09/15/2003 11:08:13 AM PDT
by
Congressman Billybob
(Everyone talks about Congress; I am doing something about it.)
To: Dog
Brit Hume just said he thinks the appeals court overreached with this ruling. There is no federal issue involved here.
Brit called it "adventurous" and then, in his Brit-thinks-these-guys-are-nuts smirk, he smirked.
295
posted on
09/15/2003 11:08:13 AM PDT
by
TomGuy
To: Peach
Brit Hume just did a brilliant analysis that I can hardly do fair justice. One of the things that he said is that within the ruling is extraordinary language about where the October election is in the "public interest". Brit said that it is not the court's job to judge what in in the "public interest", it is the court's job to interpret the laws. They are to determine what the law says, regardless of whether it is a bad law or in the "public interest."
To: Congressman Billybob
Bump....
297
posted on
09/15/2003 11:08:54 AM PDT
by
eureka!
(Rats and Presstitutes lie--they have to in order to survive.....)
To: Cinnamon Girl
Well that's a fat LIE! I live in a wealthy district and WE HAVE PUNCH CARDS!
I'm near Beverly Hills, and have been punching chad for years.
|
298
posted on
09/15/2003 11:09:11 AM PDT
by
Sabertooth
(Arnold opposes the driver's licenses, but he also wants to lobby DC to legalize Illegal Aliens. Ah.)
To: ladyinred
What happened to the argument that the election cost too much money???? I'm sure reprinting and remailing all the notices and information associated with changing the date sure is not going to make this any cheaper!
299
posted on
09/15/2003 11:09:11 AM PDT
by
ScottinSacto
(www.rtumble.com for all the CA political news)
To: Ragirl
Rush saying only the Dictators and the ACLU fear an election...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280, 281-300, 301-320 ... 801-811 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson