Condi on the red phone calling for Putin, please..
1 posted on
09/12/2003 5:10:01 AM PDT by
meg70
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: meg70
Cold War II?
2 posted on
09/12/2003 5:12:02 AM PDT by
Damocles
(sword of...)
To: meg70
Let's wait until this lunatic has enough nuke missiles to anihilate all our large cities, and then say that we should have nuked him years before.
3 posted on
09/12/2003 5:13:06 AM PDT by
per loin
To: meg70
Could Hit Anywhere Some day they'll even learn how to aim it.
4 posted on
09/12/2003 5:13:21 AM PDT by
palmer
(paid for by the "Lazamataz for Supreme Ruler" campaign.)
To: meg70
we have guided missiles that can hit anywhere hitting missiles anytime...anywhere
my missile's bigger than your missile bump
5 posted on
09/12/2003 5:15:08 AM PDT by
grumple
To: meg70
...and old US missles can hit anywhere in N. Korea...
To: meg70
They had this rocket since 1994.
7 posted on
09/12/2003 5:15:57 AM PDT by
bmwcyle
(Here's to Hillary's book sinking like the Clinton 2000 economy)
To: meg70
To: meg70
New North Korean Missile Could Hit Anywhere in the US
Time for a green glass border between China and South Korea.
11 posted on
09/12/2003 5:18:46 AM PDT by
aruanan
To: meg70
Let's see. NKorea sends a missle, blows up...uhhh, Cleveland. Ok, now what are they gonna do with their remaining 15 minutes of life?
This is more of their shakedown threats for $$$.
12 posted on
09/12/2003 5:19:02 AM PDT by
TomGuy
To: meg70
I'm just thankful that Jimmy Carter brokered that non-nuclear-proliferation treaty in 1994 that helped him with the Noel Prize! Thank God for Jimmy Carter!
</sarcasm>
13 posted on
09/12/2003 5:19:22 AM PDT by
Blzbba
To: meg70
There are many reasons for building a star wars missle defense system. It's good that one of those reasons is out in the open for all the American people to see.
To: meg70
Thank you clinton and carter
15 posted on
09/12/2003 5:25:16 AM PDT by
OldFriend
((Dems inhabit a parallel universe))
To: meg70
This proves how ineffectual, maybe even treasonous, was the Clinton Administration.
It also proves how correct is GW Bush to group these with the axis of evil.
Quick strike. Take them out. We DO NOT want this psychotic state to have this capability for long or to increase their capability at all.
18 posted on
09/12/2003 5:26:51 AM PDT by
xzins
To: meg70
19 posted on
09/12/2003 5:28:19 AM PDT by
I_dmc
To: meg70
This is patently unacceptable. North Korea must be dealt with and SOON. O'Reilly was right last night when he said that most people don't realize we are in the middle of World War III. At some point, we're going to have to drop gloves with North Korea, China, Iran, Syria, and Hamas if we want to avoid an unthinkable catastrophe. N. Korea having short range nuclear capabilities is one thing. Developing missiles that can take out Chicago, New York, and Washington is a matter of the utmost urgency. At this rate, the alternative to conflict by allowing these monsters to shift the balance of power is dreadful at best.
Most people don't realize the new wrinkle in the global nuclear arms race is this -- the participant who indicates he is willing to use their weapons in spite of MAD will win in the end. N. Korea is confident it can play the blackmail card in the face of MAD since they've shown little or no concern for their own population. Unless we are willing to pre-emptively destroy their weapons capability, we will be faced with making much more horrible choices down the road.
To: meg70; All
24 posted on
09/12/2003 5:41:50 AM PDT by
backhoe
(A nuke for every Kook ( NK, Pak, India, Iran... )- what a Clinton "legacy...")
To: meg70
I'm doubting this severely.
China, which has been developing missiles for ages is just starting to breech that threshold. The longest ones they have can hit maybe 2-3 states in. To believe Korea has better missiles than China seems rather odd.
26 posted on
09/12/2003 5:47:57 AM PDT by
Bogey78O
(The Clinton's have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured/killed -Peach)
To: meg70
This is a mirror article just posted on WWW.Globalsecurity.org....has a little more detail
____________________________________________________________
N. Korea Working on Missile Accuracy;
If developed, the new nuclear weapon could increase the communist regime's chances of striking the continental U.S., an analyst says.
By Sonni Efron
North Korea is developing a long-range missile that could hit U.S. targets with greater accuracy than its old missiles, a U.S. official confirmed Thursday.
The missile is based on the old Soviet navy's SS-N-6, a submarine-launched missile, the official said. North Korea is believed to have acquired it between 1992 and 1998, then added technology to improve the missile. It can now be launched from the ground, the official said.
North Korea is already believed to have long-range missiles, but "what it increases for them dramatically is the accuracy," the official said.
There is no indication that the Russian government sanctioned the missile technology transfer or has had any involvement in North Korea's missile program "in at least the last five years," the official said.
"We've had hints of this for several years, but it's only within the last year that we've been able to confirm that this did exist and it's derived from Russian technology," the official said, adding that the development "makes you wonder what else they might have been able to access" during that period.
As described, the missile "increases the probability that North Korea could achieve the capability of launching nuclear weapons against the continental U.S.," said John Pike, an intelligence expert who runs GlobalSecurity.org, a Web site focusing on national security issues.
If true, "it significantly changes our security situation, because for the first time they would have a missile with a proven capacity to deliver a warhead to U.S. soil," said a Capitol Hill source. "They don't have that capability absent such a missile."
Because the SS-N-6 is based on 40-year-old Soviet technology, the North Koreans could more likely deploy it "without having to farm out the testing to their buddies in Pakistan and Iran" or "blow up a lot of hardware," Pike said.
"They're going with something tried and true rather than trying to invent it themselves... They basically let [former Soviet leader Nikita] Khrushchev pay for all the exploding rockets 40 years ago."
Pike said he could not comment on the U.S. assertion that the SS-N-6 would be more accurate than North Korea's Taepodong 1 or Taepodong 2 missiles.
"I don't know who told them [U.S. intelligence] how accurate the old one was," Pike said.
There were conflicting news reports Thursday about the range of the new missile.
North Koreans fired a Taepodong 1 missile over Japan in 1998. But the Taepodong 2, which is a Taepodong 1 on top of a larger rocket, has never been field-tested.
In 1999, U.S. intelligence estimated its range at 4,000 miles, far enough to hit Alaska or Hawaii.
The SS-N-6 is estimated to have a range of 1,497 to 1,920 miles. If that is true, the missile alone would not be powerful enough to hit Los Angeles, which is about 5,900 miles from Pyongyang. The question is whether the new North Korean missile is a three-stage missile -- an SS-N-6 with the two-stage Taepodong 2 on top of it, Pike said.
If so, it might be able to deliver a nuclear warhead to Los Angeles or other U.S. cities. North Korea is believed to be attempting to miniaturize its nuclear warheads, based on relatively sophisticated, smaller designs tested by Pakistan in 1998, Pike said.
"Anybody who thinks North Korea's nuclear weapons weigh thousands of pounds rather than hundreds of pounds might be surprised," he said.
A CIA spokesman Thursday declined to comment on the existence of the missile. No other officials contacted would describe the nature of it or discuss whether it was sold to North Korea by a Russian rogue enterprise or stolen by Pyongyang.
However, the congressional source, who asked not to be named, noted that 1992-98 was a period when the Russian Pacific Fleet, which used the submarine-launched missiles, was desperately underfunded and disorganized.
"Everything was on the chopping block or the auction block," the source said.
Pike said the SS-N-6 could have been sold to North Korea in 1992 by the Makeyev design bureau of the old Soviet Ministry of General Machine Building, which had previously supplied missile technology to its communist client state. That year, Russian officials stopped a group of Makeyev scientists at the airport as they were headed to Pyongyang, he said.
News of the missile first appeared in the South Korean press and began circulating in Washington on Wednesday. It was the latest in a series of leaks from Washington over the past year that have raised alarms about North Korea's progress toward a nuclear arsenal. The political motivation behind the leaks remains unclear.
"All of [the reports] have a 'hawk' reading, that the North Koreans are going to get us and we should get them first ... and a 'dove' reading, that war with North Korea is not an option because North Korea has effectively deterred us," Pike said.
Administration officials say they expect that the U.S., North Korea, South Korea, China, Russia and Japan will meet for a second round of talks on North Korea's nuclear program, probably this fall.
© Copyright 2003 The Times Mirror Company
30 posted on
09/12/2003 5:55:48 AM PDT by
judicial meanz
(All humanity is of one Author, and is one volume; <John Donne>)
To: meg70
I'm glad I live somewhere and not just anywhere.
31 posted on
09/12/2003 5:58:24 AM PDT by
Consort
To: meg70
Yeah, but WE have missiles that can hit EVERYWHERE in North Korea. All at once. Repeatedly. :)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson