Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rohrabacher: Schwarzenegger Is the Republican Hope
NewsMax.com ^ | 9/11/03 | Dave Eberhart

Posted on 09/11/2003 1:09:52 AM PDT by kattracks

In a candid talk with NewsMax.com, U.S. Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, R-Calif., Arnold Schwarzenegger’s longtime friend, emphasizes what he perceives as the real significance of the unique recall race in that embattled, cash-strapped state:

“The liberal Democrats here represent a real Tammany Hall,” he grieves. “Davis and Bustamante are the puppeteers of the liberal left machine.”

Rohrabacher goes on to explain to NewsMax that he and his fellow Republican U.S. House members in California are by circumstance “immersed” in California politics:

“We know that we must find a way to grow the party in California. Arnold is opening up the dialogue. He is showing a lot of folks that’s its cool to be a Republican in the state. He’s attractive to young Hispanics.”

When asked by NewsMax if his touted 20-year friendship wasn’t coloring his enthusiasm, he admits: “I would call it an acquaintance relationship rather than friendship. I would not really be comfortable in calling him up socially.”

“We’ve talked more on substantive issues rather than personal matters,” Rohrabacher adds. “He has been to my house in Washington for dinner; we’ve had breakfast together in California. He’s been out to my district. I was on the movie set with him – ‘Terminator II.’”

Rohrabacher admits that his affinity for Arnold comes not so much from long acquaintance but rather “from my calculation of what’s good for California.”

“Arnold’s not perfect, but he’s our best choice as a governor with a good conservative philosophy. I agree with him 75 to 80 percent of the time,” he adds.

So why not support steadfast Republican state senator Tom McClintock, Schwarzenegger’s competitor in the race?

Backing the Front-Runner

“I agree with Tom’s viewpoints 100 percent – whereas I disagree with Arnold, as I say, about 25 percent of the time on issues. However, a vote for McClintock will only result in the Davis regime in California continuing.”

You’ve been accused of being an apologist for Mr. Schwarzenegger on your various appearances on Fox and CNN. For instance, you explained Arnold’s reticence to debate to Fox recently:

“By going on talk radio shows and by going out and meeting the people, he actually gets more of a dialogue, and people get to know what he feels more than he does by lining up with six or seven other people.

“When he came to my city in Huntington Beach, for example, he met with about 20 different businessmen just there for an hour, listening to their points of view and having a back-and-forth. That’s much more valuable time than, for example, lining up with these eight other candidates.”

How do you feel about this apologist label?

“I accept that; there’s a good reason for that,” the congressman replies. Rohrabacher goes on to talk about Warren Buffett’s “stupid” comments on California’s Proposition 13 (that puts a ceiling on property taxes), from which he quickly advised the star to distance himself.

“Arnold has substantial convictions,” Rohrabacher continues. “It’s not gotten a lot of play in the press, but about four years ago he agreed to back my school voucher initiative. Now, granted, his support has now gone to more a choice among public schools …

“With Arnold it’s all about his good gut instincts. I know Arnold; he’s not about finding new ways to tax citizens.”

How about other Republican members of the U.S. House from California?

“Don’t know of anyone that has endorsed McClintock. Everyone I know is behind Arnold.”

Disavowing any polls that indicate that the momentum for the recall itself is waning, Rohrabacher steadfastly maintains it’s still at about 60 percent in favor. “The recall will win handily,” he notes with conviction.

As to Arnold’s personal momentum: “One-third of Californians support him right off.” The challenge is to “go higher” by attracting the McClintock supporters, for instance. “They have to come on.”

Arnold’s appeal is not coming from the details but from his basic approach, Rohrabacher instructs. “He’s clearly not a big-government man. He’s unabashedly pro-business, a low-tax guy. As to the details, they will get worked out as things go along – after he is in the governor’s mansion.”

Meanwhile, Rohrabacher, the self-admitted apologist, says he hasn’t bothered to defend Arnold about the current crop of womanizing charges: “No one cares about his formerly wild personal life before getting married.”

Editor's Note:
Do you support Arnold Schwarzenegger? Vote in online poll – Click Here Now

Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
California Governor's Race



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-228 next last

1 posted on 09/11/2003 1:09:52 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
There are a lot of "Freepers" who would rather see Bustamante governer than Schwarzenegger. So they will vote for McClintock, which is a vote for Bustamante.

Maybe they are just insane.

2 posted on 09/11/2003 1:15:15 AM PDT by Iris7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne; Tamsey; goldstategop; BibChr; PhiKapMom; FairOpinion
ping
3 posted on 09/11/2003 1:16:59 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iris7
I respect them even if I don't think they're right. Arnold has the name recognition and claims to be a fiscal conservative but when pressed, he doesn't get specific where people want to know more what he'll do as Governor. That's why conservatives aren't sold on him.... I mean they don't love him and vice versa and after being called "right wing crazies" it gives us a big pause. I do agree with Tom 100% but California has more moderate than conservative voters and they're the types who split the difference. At the end of day we'll have to decide whether to go as Dana Rohrabacher observed, to go with a candidate we agree with 100% of the time and who can't win or to go with a candidate we agree with 75% of the time and who can win. What a dilemma.
4 posted on 09/11/2003 1:22:14 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop; Bonaparte; kellynla; Rabid Republican; heleny; Bob; EternalVigilance; Reagan Man; ...
Arnold's not perfect, but he's our best choice as a governor with a good conservative philosophy. I agree with him 75 to 80 percent of the time, he adds.

Wouldn't you love it if the interviewer immediately put Rohrbacher on the spot and asked: "What are the positions on which you agree with Schwarzenegger 75 to 80 percent of the time, Congressman Rohrbacher? Be specific."

He'd freeze up like a deer in headlights. I've asked this question over and over and over again on this forum, and the Arnold Groupies either ignore the question or lash out with personal attacks against either Senator McClintock or myself. Amazing.

5 posted on 09/11/2003 1:24:59 AM PDT by ambrose (I'm a Right-Wing Crazy, and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iris7
*BUMP* !
6 posted on 09/11/2003 1:33:42 AM PDT by ex-Texan (Read Sun Tsu: The Cold War Never Ended)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
No dilemma whatever.

You are dying of thirst. You can get a half gallon of water easily. Instead you get no water at all and die because you insisted on a full gallon of water or nothing.

Hey, I don't think much of Schwarzenegger, as personally I am to the Right of McClintock. I think McClintock is a Whig fool.

7 posted on 09/11/2003 1:44:28 AM PDT by Iris7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
On this forum I've found in the nearly 3 years I've participated that it is best to not share certain views. Perhaps others have a similar reticence. It's either "my way or the highway" with the most vocal 10% or so who feel they can define all Republicans.
8 posted on 09/11/2003 1:45:04 AM PDT by BonnieJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BonnieJ
bump!
9 posted on 09/11/2003 1:47:28 AM PDT by lainde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
When I got back from Viet Nam I spent about twenty years reading and thinking and trying to figure out what actually happened in Washington and why. The book that made the most difference in my thinking during this period was Griffiths' translation of Sun Tsu.

People are so dumb that they think politics is about what they LIKE!!! About what they WANT!!! Get over it! Grow up! Take reality seriously!

10 posted on 09/11/2003 1:50:41 AM PDT by Iris7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Iris7
You are dying of thirst. You can get a half gallon of water easily. Instead you get no water at all and die because you insisted on a full gallon of water or nothing.

Nice anology.

It gets even worse when someone is trying to poison the half gallon that you do have available.

11 posted on 09/11/2003 1:52:34 AM PDT by Jeff Gordon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
“I agree with Tom’s viewpoints 100 percent – whereas I disagree with Arnold, as I say, about 25 percent of the time on issues. However, a vote for McClintock will only result in the Davis regime in California continuing.”

What 25% do you disagree with? I can't find even 10% on which I can agree with him on.

How can anyone honestly say that they agree with Tom's viewpoints 100% but only disagree with 25% of Arnold's?

12 posted on 09/11/2003 1:53:39 AM PDT by Bob (http://www.TomMcClintock.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks




INTERACTIVE SOUND

allow image file loading time






13 posted on 09/11/2003 1:55:15 AM PDT by autoresponder (PETA TERRORISTS .wav file: BRUCE FRIEDRICH: http://tinyurl.com/hjhd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


14 posted on 09/11/2003 1:55:55 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BonnieJ
If the Republican party cannot win because Republicans simply refuse discipline then they will become extinct. This is how the Whig party died in the 1850's, and how the Republican party started.

(To over simplify!)

15 posted on 09/11/2003 1:59:36 AM PDT by Iris7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Gordon
All kinds of guys are trying to poison that half gallon that is available. The big media boys are giving it their best shot. All you see about Schwarzenegger in the big media is stuff intended to freak out social conservatives and make them vote for McClintock. Unfortunately that is what the McClintock people are doing also. Politics makes strange bedfellows, indeed!!! Big Media hustling votes for McClintock!! Those big boys must think Republicans are real stupid!!!
16 posted on 09/11/2003 2:09:34 AM PDT by Iris7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Bob
Yup. Everyone continues to talk about "half a loaf" and other cliched analogies.

Trouble is, they *refuse* to answer what positions are in this alleged "half of loaf" that we're supposed to take...
17 posted on 09/11/2003 2:27:54 AM PDT by ambrose (I'm a Right-Wing Crazy, and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Iris7
Oh ... why isn't Clint Eastwood running !
18 posted on 09/11/2003 2:31:59 AM PDT by f.Christian (evolution vs intelligent design ... science3000 ... designeduniverse.com --- * architecture * !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Iris7
The Whig Party died because it was being run by a bunch of spineless pansies who refused to confront or even recognize the central moral question of their day; slavery.

The central moral question of our day is abortion. Since Ronald Reagan, the GOP has at least paid lip service to the cause of saving the unborn. Very little has actually been accomplished to stop it, but at least the Party has been predominately pro-life.

But if the new standard is Arnold Schwarzenegger, we are heading for the end of the Party. It will become as useless in this generation as the Whig Party became in its generation, and will join the Whigs on the ashheap of history.

I don't want that. Too many have sacrificed too much to make the Republican Party the ruling majority party in the United States. The damage to our republic done by the collapse of the GOP would be incalculable.

So, get your history straight.

You are mistaken in thinking that an unwillingness to support a self-described 'extreme liberal on social issues' (that is politico-speak for abortion) will cause the downfall of our Party when exactly the opposite is true.

I hope you will consider my words.

Regards,
EV
19 posted on 09/11/2003 2:40:23 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (God save the United States of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
"Amazing."

Bears repeating.

20 posted on 09/11/2003 3:14:29 AM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-228 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson