Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Litmus Test for American Conservatism (The paloeconservative view of Abe Lincoln.)
Chronicles Magazine ^ | January 2001 | Donald W. Livingston

Posted on 09/06/2003 9:14:08 AM PDT by quidnunc

Abraham Lincoln is thought of by many as not only the greatest American statesman but as a great conservative. He was neither. Understanding this is a necessary condition for any genuinely American conservatism. When Lincoln took office, the American polity was regarded as a compact between sovereign states which had created a central government as their agent, hedging it in by a doctrine of enumerated powers. Since the compact between the states was voluntary, secession was considered an option by public leaders in every section of the Union during the antebellum period. Given this tradition — deeply rooted in the Declaration of Independence — a great statesman in 1860 would have negotiated a settlement with the disaffected states, even if it meant the withdrawal of some from the Union. But Lincoln refused even to accept Confederate commissioners, much less negotiate with them. Most of the Union could have been kept together. Virginia, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Arkansas voted to remain in the Union even after the Confederacy was formed; they reversed themselves only when Lincoln decided on a war of coercion. A great statesman does not seduce his people into a needless war; he keeps them out of it.

When the Soviet Union dissolved by peaceful secession, it was only 70 years old — the same age as the United States when it dissolved in 1860. Did Gorbachev fail as a statesman because he negotiated a peaceful dissolution of the U.S.S.R.? Likewise, if all states west of the Mississippi were to secede tomorrow, would we praise, as a great statesman, a president who refused to negotiate and launched total war against the civilian population merely to preserve the Union? The number of Southerners who died as a result of Lincoln’s invasion was greater than the total of all Americans killed by Hitler and Tojo. By the end of the war, nearly one half of the white male population of military age was either dead or mutilated. No country in World War II suffered casualties of that magnitude.

Not only would Lincoln not receive Confederate commissioners, he refused, for three crucial months, to call Congress. Alone, he illegally raised money, illegally raised troops, and started the war. To crush Northern opposition, he suspended the writ of habeas corpus for the duration of the war and rounded up some 20,000 political prisoners. (Mussolini arrested some 12,000 but convicted only 1,624.) When the chief justice of the Supreme Court declared the suspension blatantly unconstitutional and ordered the prisoners released, Lincoln ordered his arrest. This American Caesar shut down over 300 newspapers, arrested editors, and smashed presses. He broke up state legislatures; arrested Democratic candidates who urged an armistice; and used the military to elect Republicans (including himself, in 1864, by a margin of around 38,000 popular votes). He illegally created a “state” in West Virginia and imported a large army of foreign mercenaries. B.H. Liddell Hart traces the origin of modern total war to Lincoln’s decision to direct war against the civilian population. Sherman acknowledged that, by the rules of war taught at West Point, he was guilty of war crimes punishable by death. But who was to enforce those rules?

These actions are justified by nationalist historians as the energetic and extraordinary efforts of a great helmsman rising to the painful duty of preserving an indivisible Union. But Lincoln had inherited no such Union from the Framers. Rather, like Bismarck, he created one with a policy of blood and iron. What we call the “Civil War” was in fact America’s French Revolution, and Lincoln was the first Jacobin president. He claimed legitimacy for his actions with a “conservative” rhetoric, rooted in an historically false theory of the Constitution which held that the states had never been sovereign. The Union created the states, he said, not the states the Union. In time, this corrupt and corrupting doctrine would suck nearly every reserved power of the states into the central government. Lincoln seared into the American mind an ideological style of politics which, through a sort of alchemy, transmuted a federative “union” of states into a French revolutionary “nation” launched on an unending global mission of achieving equality. Lincoln’s corrupt constitutionalism and his ideological style of politics have, over time, led to the hollowing out of traditional American society and the obscene concentration of power in the central government that the Constitution was explicitly designed to prevent.

A genuinely American conservatism, then, must adopt the project of preserving and restoring the decentralized federative polity of the Framers rooted in state and local sovereignty. The central government has no constitutional authority to do most of what it does today. The first question posed by an authentic American conservative politics is not whether a policy is good or bad, but what agency (the states or the central government — if either) has the authority to enact it. This is the principle of subsidiarity: that as much as possible should be done by the smallest political unit.

The Democratic and Republican parties are Lincolnian parties. Neither honestly questions the limits of federal authority to do this or that. In 1861, the central government broke free from what Jefferson called “the chains of the Constitution,” and we have, consequently, inherited a fractured historical memory. There are now two Americanisms: pre-Lincolnian and post-Lincolnian. The latter is Jacobinism by other means. Only the former can lay claim to being the primordial American conservatism.

David W. Livingston is a professor of philosophy at Emory University and the author of Philosophical Melancholy and Delirium (University of Chicago Press).


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News
KEYWORDS: dixie; dixielist; history; lincoln; litmustest; paleoconartists; paleocons
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 801-820821-840841-860 ... 981-992 next last
To: nolu chan
President Lincoln said in a letter from 1864 that events had controlled him, not the other way around.

Yeah, he was talking about that emancipation thing and being Forced Into Glory.

Well, let's see what he said.

"I am naturally anti-slavery. If slavery is not wrong, nothing is wrong. I can not remember when I did not so think, and feel. And yet I have never understood that the presidency conferred upon me an unrestricted right to act upon this judgment and feeling. It was in the oath I took, that I would, to the utmost of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. I could not take the office without taking the oath. Nor was it my view that I might take an oath to get power, and break the oath in using the power. I understood too, that in ordinary civil administration this oath even forbade me to practically indulge my primary abstract judgment on the moral question of slavery. I have publically declared this many times, and in many ways. And I aver that, to this day, I have done no official act in mere deference to my abstract judgment and feeling on slavery. I did understand however that my oath to preserve the constitution to the best of my ability, imposed upon me the duty of preserving by every indispensible means, that government--that nation--of which that constitution was the organic law...

I add a word which was not in the verbal conversation. In telling this tale I attempt no compliment to my own sagacity. I claim not to have controlled events, but confess plainly that events have controlled me. Now, at the end of three years struggle the Nation's condition is not what either party, or any man devised, or expected. God alone can claim it. Whither it is tending seems plain. If God now wills the removal of a great wrong, and wills also that we of the North as well as you of the South, shall pay for our complicity in that wrong, impartial history will find therein new cause to attest and revere the justice and goodness of God."

A. Lincoln, 4/4/64

Walt

821 posted on 09/27/2003 3:55:14 AM PDT by WhiskeyPapa (Virtue is the uncontested prize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 801 | View Replies]

To: nolu chan
LAWRENCE M. KEITT

"Our people have come to this on the question of slavery. I am willing, in that address to rest it upon that question. I think it is the great central point from which we are now proceeding, and I am not willing to divert the public attention from it."

--Lawrence Keitt, speaking in the South Carolina secession convention

Walt

822 posted on 09/27/2003 3:57:44 AM PDT by WhiskeyPapa (Virtue is the uncontested prize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 812 | View Replies]

To: nolu chan
On Friday we saw you, and we called upon you then to redeem your pledge. You could not deny it.

Any arrangement that President Buchanan had with the South Carolinians was abrogated by the act of their passing a secession document. Thereafter, President Buchanan adopted the policy of maintaining the national authority; the same policy continued uninterrupted by the Lincoln administration. See The Coming Fury, by Bruce Catton.

"Major Anderson had been told that in case he was attacked he was to "defend himself to the last extremity," and it seemed to James Buchanan that this was going beyond common sense. At the president's insistance, a letter over Floyd's signature was sent to Anderson. The major was not to sacrifice his own life or the lives of his men in a hopeless fight; if he was obviously overpowered, he could bow to necessity and make the best terms possible -- this would be the course of a brave and honorable officer, "and you will be fully justified in such action." Additionally, the part of Buell's memorandum which told Anersn he could occupy any fort he chose if he had reason to believe that he was going to be attacked was mildly qualified by the addition of of the word "defensive" in the description of the steps that were permitted him.

Whether anyone realized it or not, the administration had at last taken a positive step. Until now, Major Anderson had been told nothing except that he could defend himself if attacked. Now he was given full authority to move from Fort Moultrie to Fort Sumter -- not merely if he was attacked, but whenever he had tangible evidence "of a design to proceed to a hostile act." Inasmuch as tangible evidence hung of such a design hung over Charleston as thick as a winter fog, Anderson had in substance been told he could go over to Sumter whenever he thought best."

-- "The Coming Fury" pp. 148-49 by Bruce Catton

Walt

823 posted on 09/27/2003 4:22:01 AM PDT by WhiskeyPapa (Virtue is the uncontested prize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 812 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyPapa
None of the framers suggested the states were sovereign.

You ignore the Declaration of Independence and the 10th Amendment, Walt.

Why do you push the South Carolinians' lies?

There were no lies in South Carolina's declaration.

824 posted on 09/27/2003 6:08:41 AM PDT by PhilipFreneau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 815 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyPapa
As Abraham Lincoln pointed out in his Cooper Union speech of 2/27/60, the framers' clear intent was to eventually end slavery. That is why they arranged to end the slave trade in 1808 and why they outlawed slavery in the territories. Lincoln showed in this speech that a clear majority of the framers were on record as favoring an end to slavery. That is when he became a marked man in the south.

Of course, there is this clause: ". . . nothing in this Constitution shall be so construed as to Prejudice any Claims of the United States, or of any particular State". (Article 4, Sect 3, Clause 2)

And this one: "[the President] shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed."

And there is always this pesky clause: "No Person held to Service or Labour in one State, under the Laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in Consequence of any Law or Regulation therein, be discharged from such Service or Labour, but shall be delivered up on Claim of the Party to whom such Service or Labour may be due."

The last clause contradicts your statement. It clearly provides protection for slavery. You cannot have it both ways, Walt. If you do not support and defend all of the Constitution, you support none of it.

825 posted on 09/27/2003 6:28:06 AM PDT by PhilipFreneau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 818 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyPapa
The slave power deserves nothing but condemnation, but they have a ready defender in you.

You are a condescending Jackass, Walt.

A Constitution that condones slavery should be thrown down, don't you agree? The Republican Party had found a way to peaceably end slavery -- restrict it to the territory where it was, and it would die. The slave power --whom you defend-- were willing to fight tooth and nail to protect --human slavery--. You are making the connection here, right?

There was a lawful way to end slaver. It is called the Amendment process. Lincoln and the rebellious Northern States usurped the Constitution, not the Southern states. By their actions the Constitution was thrown down, and now we have the very form of government that led to the Revolution -- the form the Founding Fathers most feared -- whereby power is centralized in Washington. If you cannot see this your prejudice has blinded you.

826 posted on 09/27/2003 6:37:04 AM PDT by PhilipFreneau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 818 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyPapa
South Carolina made a good case.

That is disgusting.

The truth hurts, sometimes, Walt.

827 posted on 09/27/2003 6:38:29 AM PDT by PhilipFreneau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 819 | View Replies]

To: nolu chan
[nc] What you quote is extracted from the middle of a long letter from President Buchanan to the Commissioners of the State of South Carolina

No, I simply posted the relevant communication. The written memorandum of Sec. of War Floyd's verbal orders to Major Anderson, that D.C. Buell placed into the official record upon his return to Washington.

[nc] No, I had it right and you failed to provide a link to the official record for a very good reason.

OFFICIAL RECORDS Series 1, vol 1, part 1 (Charleston Campaign) Pages 89&90

[nc] Lincoln sent a confidential message to General Scott. Scott appears to have reached out and touched Major Anderson

The record says otherwise chump. try again.

828 posted on 09/27/2003 7:36:42 AM PDT by mac_truck (Ora et Labora)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 812 | View Replies]

To: PhilipFreneau
It clearly provides protection for slavery.

As more and more people in the 19th century became uncomfortable with this, the slave power became more and more confrontational. They finally resorted to revolution.

Whether you like it or not, the judical power of the United States rests with the Supreme Court. The Court clearly ruled that the president had the power --under law-- to put down the rebellion. That was the ruling in the Prize Cases, where the court cites the Militia Act of 1792 as amended in 1795. That act leaves to the sole discretion of the president when rebellion or insurrection existed.

That is the law. What the southern states did was revolution. It was outside the law.

Walt

829 posted on 09/27/2003 8:30:55 AM PDT by WhiskeyPapa (Virtue is the uncontested prize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 825 | View Replies]

To: PhilipFreneau
And this one: "[the President] shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed."


Militia Act of 1792,
Second Congress, Session I. Chapter XXVIII
Passed May 2, 1792,

The Militia Act of 1792, Passed May 8, 1792, providing federal standards for the organization of the Militia.

An ACT more effectually to provide for the National Defence, by establishing an Uniform Militia throughout the United States.

I. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That each and every free able-bodied white male citizen of the respective States, resident therein, who is or shall be of age of eighteen years, and under the age of forty-five years (except as is herein after excepted) shall severally and respectively be enrolled in the militia, by the Captain or Commanding Officer of the company, within whose bounds such citizen shall reside, and that within twelve months after the passing of this Act. And it shall at all time hereafter be the duty of every such Captain or Commanding Officer of a company, to enroll every such citizen as aforesaid, and also those who shall, from time to time, arrive at the age of 18 years, or being at the age of 18 years, and under the age of 45 years (except as before excepted) shall come to reside within his bounds; and shall without delay notify such citizen of the said enrollment, by the proper non-commissioned Officer of the company, by whom such notice may be proved. That every citizen, so enrolled and notified, shall, within six months thereafter, provide himself with a good musket or firelock, a sufficient bayonet and belt, two spare flints, and a knapsack, a pouch, with a box therein, to contain not less than twenty four cartridges, suited to the bore of his musket or firelock, each cartridge to contain a proper quantity of power and ball; or with a good rifle, knapsack, shot-pouch, and power-horn, twenty balls suited to the bore of his rifle, and a quarter of a power of power; and shall appear so armed, accoutred and provided, when called out to exercise or into service, except, that when called out on company days to exercise only, he may appear without a knapsack. That the commissioned Officers shall severally be armed with a sword or hanger, and espontoon; and that from and after five years from the passing of this Act, all muskets from arming the militia as is herein required, shall be of bores sufficient for balls of the eighteenth part of a pound; and every citizen so enrolled, and providing himself with the arms, ammunition and accoutrements, required as aforesaid, shall hold the same exempted from all suits, distresses, executions or sales, for debt or for the payment of taxes.

II. And be it further enacted, That the Vice-President of the United States, the Officers, judicial and executives, of the government of the United States; the members of both houses of Congress, and their respective officers; all custom house officers, with the clerks; all post officers, and stage-drivers who are employed in the care and conveyance of the mail of the post office of the United States; all Ferrymen employed at any ferry on the post road; all inspectors of exports; all pilots, all mariners actually employed in the sea service of any citizen or merchant within the United States; and all persons who now are or may be hereafter exempted by the laws of the respective states, shall be and are hereby exempted from militia duty, notwithstanding their being above the age of eighteen and under the age of forty-five years.

III. And be it further enacted, That within one year after the passing of the Act, the militia of the respective states shall be arranged into divisions, brigades, regiments, battalions, and companies, as the legislature of each state shall direct; and each division, brigade, and regiment, shall be numbered at the formation thereof; and a record made of such numbers of the Adjutant-General's office in the state; and when in the field, or in serviced in the state, such division, brigade, and regiment shall, respectively, take rank according to their numbers, reckoning the first and lowest number highest in rank. That if the same be convenient, each brigade shall consist of four regiments; each regiment or two battalions; each battalion of five companies; each company of sixty-four privates. That the said militia shall be officered by the respective states, as follows: To each division on Major-General, with two Aids-de-camp, with the rank of major; to each brigade, one brigadier-major, with the rank of a major; to each company, one captain, one lieutenant, one ensign, four serjeants, four corporals, one drummer, and one fifer and bugler. That there shall be a regimental staff, to consist of one adjutant, and one quartermaster, to rank as lieutenants; one paymaster; one surgeon, and one surgeon's mate; one serjeant-major; one drum- major, and one fife-major.

IV. And be it further enacted, That out of the militia enrolled as is herein directed, there shall be formed for each battalion, as least one company of grenadiers, light infantry or riflemen; and that each division there shall be, at least, one company of artillery, and one troop of horse: There shall be to each company of artillery, one captain, two lieutenants, four serjeants, four corporals, six gunners, six bombardiers, one drummer, and one fifer. The officers to be armed with a sword or hanger, a fusee, bayonet and belt, with a cartridge box to contain twelve cartridges; and each private of matoss shall furnish themselves with good horses of at least fourteen hands and an half high, and to be armed with a sword and pair of pistols, the holsters of which to be covered with bearskin caps. Each dragoon to furnish himself with a serviceable horse, at least fourteen hands and an half high, a good saddle, bridle, mail-pillion and valise, holster, and a best plate and crupper, a pair of boots and spurs; a pair of pistols, a sabre, and a cartouchbox to contain twelve cartridges for pistols. That each company of artillery and troop of house shall be formed of volunteers from the brigade, at the discretion of the Commander in Chief of the State, not exceeding one company of each to a regiment, nor more in number than one eleventh part of the infantry, and shall be uniformly clothed in raiments, to be furnished at their expense, the colour and fashion to be determined by the Brigadier commanding the brigade to which they belong.

V. And be it further enacted, That each battalion and regiment shall be provided with the state and regimental colours by the Field-Officers, and each company with a drum and fife or bugle-horn, by the commissioned officers of the company, in such manner as the legislature of the respective States shall direct.

VI. And be it further enacted, That there shall be an adjutant general appointed in each state, whose duty it shall be to distribute all orders for the Commander in Chief of the State to the several corps; to attend all publick reviews, when the Commander in Chief of the State shall review the militia, or any part thereof; to obey all orders from him relative to carrying into execution, and perfecting, the system of military discipline established by this Act; to furnish blank forms of different returns that may be required; and to explain the principles of which they should be made; to receive from the several officers of the different corps throughout the state, returns of the militia under their command, reporting the actual situation of their arms, accoutrements, and ammunition, their delinquencies, and every other thing which relates to the general advancement of good order and discipline: All which, the several officers of the division, brigades, regiments, and battalions are hereby required to make in the usual manner, so that the said adjutant general may be duly furnished therewith: From all which returns be shall make proper abstracts, and by the same annually before the Commander in Chief of the State.

VII. And be it further enacted, That the rules of discipline, approved and established by Congress, in their resolution of the twenty-ninth of March, 1779, shall be the rules of discipline so be observed by the militia throughout the United States, except such deviations from the said rules, as may be rendered necessary by the requisitions of the Act, or by some other unavoidable circumstances. It shall be the duty of the Commanding Officer as every muster, whether by battalion, regiment, or single company, to cause the militia to be exercised and trained, agreeably to the said rules of said discipline.

VIII. And be it further enacted, That all commissioned officers shall take rank according to the date of their commissions; and when two of the same grade bear an equal date, then their rank to be determined by lots, to be drawn by them before the Commanding officers of the brigade, regiment, battalion, company or detachment.

IX. And be it further enacted That if any person whether officer or solder, belonging to the militia of any state, and called out into the service of the United States, be wounded or disabled, while in actual service, he shall be taken care of an provided for at the publick expense.

X. And be it further enacted, That it shall be the duty of the brigade inspector, to attend the regimental and battalion meeting of the militia composing their several brigades, during the time of their being under arms, to inspect their arms, ammunition and accoutrements; superintend their exercise and maneuvres and introduce the system of military discipline before described, throughout the brigade, agreeable to law, and such orders as they shall from time to time receive from the commander in Chief of the State; to make returns to the adjutant general of the state at least once in every year, of the militia of the brigade to which he belongs, reporting therein the actual situation of the arms, accoutrement, and ammunition, of the several corps, and every other thing which, in his judgment, may relate to their government and general advancement of good order and military disciple; an adjutant general shall make a return of all militia of the state, to the Commander in Chief of the said state, and a duplicate of the same to the president of the United States.

And whereas sundry corps of artillery, cavalry and infantry now exist in several of the said states, which by the laws, customs, or usages thereof, have not been incorporated with, or subject to the general regulation of the militia.

XI. Be it enacted, That such corps retain their accustomed privileges subject, nevertheless, to all other duties required by this Act, in like manner with the other militias.

[Act of February 28, 1795, made small revisions in Sections 2, 4, 5, and 10 of Act of May 2, 1792. The 1795 act was the authority for ruling in Houston v. Moore, 1820. Other revisions were enacted April 18, 1814]

Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That whenever the laws of the United States shall be opposed or the execution thereof obstructed, in any state, by combinations too powerful to be suppressed by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, or by the powers vested in the marshals by this act, [words requiring notification by an associate justice or district judge were omitted in 1795 revision. The revision gave the President more authority] the same being notified to the President of the United States, by an associate justice or the district judge, it shall be lawful for the President of the United States to call forth the militia of such state to suppress such combinations, and to cause the laws to be duly executed. And if the militia of a state, where such combinations may happen, shall refuse, or be insufficient to suppress the same, it shall be lawful for the President, if the legislature of the United States be not in session, to call forth and employ such numbers of the militia of any other state or states most convenient thereto, as may be necessary, and the use of militia, so to be called forth, may be continued, if necessary, until the expiration of thirty days after the commencement of the ensuing session.

Sec. 4. And be it further enacted, That the militia employed in the service of the United States, shall receive the same pay and allowances, as the troops of the United States, [omitted in 1795: "who may be in service at the same time, or who were last in service, and shall be subject to the same rules and articles of war"]: And that no officer, non-commissioned officer or private of the militia shall be compelled to serve more than three months in any one year, nor more than in due rotation with every other able-bodied man of the same rank in the battalion to which be belongs.

Sec. 5. And be it further enacted, That every officer, non-commissioned officer or private of the militia, who shall fail to obey the orders of the President of the United States in any of the cases before recited, shall forfeit a sum not exceeding one year's pay, and not less than one month's pay, to be determined and adjudged by a court martial; and such officers shall, moreover, be liable to be cashiered by sentence of a court martial: [words added in 1795:] and be incapacitated from holding a commission in the militia, for a term not exceeding twelve months, at the discretion of the said court: and such non-commissioned officers and privates shall be liable to be imprisoned by the like sentence, or failure of payment of the fines adjudged against them, for the space of one calendar month for every five dollars of such fine.

Sec. 10. [revised to read:] And be it further enacted, That the act, intitled "Act to provide for calling forth the militia, to execute the laws of Union, suppress insurrections, and repel invasions," passed the second day of May one thousand seven hundred and ninety-two, shall be, and the same is hereby repealed.

APPROVED, February 28, 1795.



830 posted on 09/27/2003 8:59:52 AM PDT by WhiskeyPapa (Virtue is the uncontested prize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 825 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyPapa
What, exactly, was it that Lincoln considered a greater evil, even to the cause of human liberty itself?

The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln, Vol. 2, page 130

LINK

A Greater Evil, Even to the Cause of Human Liberty Itself

Abraham Lincoln
July 6, 1852

HONORS TO HENRY CLAY

Having been led to allude to domestic slavery so frequently already, I am unwilling to close without referring more particularly to Mr. Clay's views and conduct in regard to it. He ever was, on principle and in feeling, opposed to slavery. The very earliest, and one of the latest public efforts of his life, separated by a period of more than fifty years, were both made in favor of gradual emancipation of the slaves in Kentucky. He did not perceive, that on a question of human right, the negroes were to be excepted from the human race. And yet Mr. Clay was the owner of slaves. Cast into life where slavery was already widely spread and deeply seated, he did not perceive, as I think no wise man has perceived, how it could be at once eradicated, without producing a greater evil, even to the cause of human liberty itself.

831 posted on 09/27/2003 11:47:21 AM PDT by nolu chan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 821 | View Replies]

To: mac_truck
[yugo] The record says otherwise chump. try again.

I quoted the record.

You haved yet to quote or cite any record, just an alleged verbal order which did NOT give Anderson permission to leave Moultrie at will.

The action of Secretary of War Floyd speaks volumes more than your rubbish - he resigned because the administration would not undo what had been done without permission.

Under these circumstances it is clear that Major Anderson acted upon his own responsibility, and without authority, unless, indeed, he had "tangible evidence of a design to proceed to a hostile act" on the part of the authorities of South Carolina, which as not yet been alleged. Still, he is a brave and honorable officer, and justice requires that he should not be condemned without a fair hearing."

Your wheel fell off again, yugo.

832 posted on 09/27/2003 11:57:22 AM PDT by nolu chan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 828 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyPapa
Under these circumstances it is clear that Major Anderson acted upon his own responsibility, and without authority, unless, indeed, he had "tangible evidence of a design to proceed to a hostile act" on the part of the authorities of South Carolina, which as not yet been alleged. Still, he is a brave and honorable officer, and justice requires that he should not be condemned without a fair hearing."

Tangible evidence does not consist of some winter fog of horsepucky conjured up by some writer pumping up his prose with gas.

833 posted on 09/27/2003 12:04:22 PM PDT by nolu chan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 823 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
President Lincoln implemented the blockade as a tool to combat the southern rebellion. It wasn't implemented until the Davis regime had initiated hostilities.

When did the Davis regime initiate hostilities?

You must have meant King Lincoln.

834 posted on 09/27/2003 12:07:25 PM PDT by nolu chan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 817 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyPapa
>>As more and more people in the 19th century became uncomfortable with this, the slave power became more and more confrontational. They finally resorted to revolution.

Yes, the northern states rebelled, and Lincoln sided with them, rather than to due his sworn duty to support and defend the Constitution.

>> What the southern states did was revolution. It was outside the law.

What the northern states did to precipitate the secession was revolution. It was outside the law.

835 posted on 09/27/2003 2:23:07 PM PDT by PhilipFreneau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 829 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyPapa
>> And this one: "[the President] shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed."

Too bad he did not. If he had forced the northern states to obey the Supreme Law, there would have been no reason for the southern states to secede.

>>Militia Act of 1792

Already read it, and it clearly states the militia is to be used "to execute the laws of Union". Unfortunately, the federal government did not use the militia to execute the laws of the union (to force the northern state to obey the law), and that alone precipitated secession and civil war.






836 posted on 09/27/2003 2:31:11 PM PDT by PhilipFreneau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 830 | View Replies]

To: PhilipFreneau
>> And this one: "[the President] shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed."

Too bad he did not. If he had forced the northern states to obey the Supreme Law, there would have been no reason for the southern states to secede.

Seven states published secession documents before President Lincoln even took office. Idiot.

Walt

837 posted on 09/27/2003 3:17:42 PM PDT by WhiskeyPapa (Virtue is the uncontested prize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 836 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyPapa
>> Seven states published secession documents before President Lincoln even took office. Idiot.

I'm sorry, but did I mention Lincoln? I believe my statement read, "[the President]". Imbecile.
838 posted on 09/27/2003 3:25:17 PM PDT by PhilipFreneau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 837 | View Replies]

To: nolu chan
(yawn)

[nc] Lincoln sent a confidential message to General Scott. Scott appears to have reached out and touched Major Anderson

False. Here is the relavant communication surrounding Major Anderson's move from Ft. Moultrie to Ft. Sumter. see 804

nc] What you quote is extracted from the middle of a long letter from President Buchanan to the Commissioners of the State of South Carolina

No, I simply posted the relevant communication. The written memorandum of Sec. of War Floyd's verbal orders to Major Anderson, that D.C. Buell placed into the official record upon his return to Washington. see 812

You haved yet to quote or cite any record, just an alleged verbal order which did NOT give Anderson permission to leave Moultrie at will.

(Yawn)

Yes, an order from Secretary of War Floyd. Are you disputing that he gave the order, or suggesting that D.C. Buell's memorandum in the official record somehow misrepresented that order?

839 posted on 09/27/2003 4:33:44 PM PDT by mac_truck (Ora et Labora)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 832 | View Replies]

To: PhilipFreneau
I'm sorry, but did I mention Lincoln? I believe my statement read, "[the President]". Imbecile.

Blither all you like. This is what you said in #836:

Too bad he did not. If he had forced the northern states to obey the Supreme Law, there would have been no reason for the southern states to secede.

Idiot.

840 posted on 09/27/2003 6:01:20 PM PDT by WhiskeyPapa (Virtue is the uncontested prize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 838 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 801-820821-840841-860 ... 981-992 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson