Skip to comments.
California's Driver License Bill Opens Door to Voter Fraud and Illegal Gun Sales
NewsMax ^
| Friday, September 5, 2003
| Eric Leonard
Posted on 09/05/2003 3:17:18 PM PDT by demlosers
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
To: demlosers
Auto fraudo - if we do retain the Presidency and improve our numbers in Congress, we MUST deal with this - there will be no other chance.
41
posted on
09/05/2003 6:04:15 PM PDT
by
Let's Roll
(And those that cried Appease! Appease! are hanged by those they tried to please!")
To: Thank You Rush; All
...No Los Angeles TV Coverage of DAVIS Signing this Drivers License Ceremony by:
KABC-TV Disney Channel 7
KCET-TV PBS Channel 28
...Partial TV Coverage by:
KCBS-TV CBS Channel 2
KNBC-TV NBC Channel 4
Just Recalled Mencha Partisan NAVIVO LOPEZ was just praised by Gov. GRAY DAVIS on TV. This is the one who helped Congressman LORETTA SANCHEZ get past BOB DORNAN with Illegal Votes in 1996.
The Enemy is now Within...
and always has been...
as 2004 Presidential Candidate...
HILLARY smiles broadly...
at Mexican Province California.
42
posted on
09/05/2003 6:29:19 PM PDT
by
ALOHA RONNIE
(Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 www.LZXRAY.com ..)
To: demlosers; All
...A Governor GRAY DAVIS who is complaining about the high cost of the Recall Election against him...
...is not complaining about all the weekends that the California DMV will have to open up, at Employee Time and a Half, to process the multitude of illegals applying for Drivers Licenses after January 1, 2004.
...Uh, Over..!!!
43
posted on
09/05/2003 6:33:41 PM PDT
by
ALOHA RONNIE
(Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 www.LZXRAY.com ..)
To: demlosers
"Go ahead Kalifornia, make it law."
He did.
Don't blame the Calif. citizens. We didn't want it and we didn't do it.
Grey Davis knows most of the citizens were against doing this and he didn't care, because he never cared.
He's a stupid looking rich, elitist, who thinks he's lord over the "common" people.In other words, a polititian.
44
posted on
09/05/2003 6:35:31 PM PDT
by
philetus
(Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get)
To: demlosers
Isn't this aiding and abetting a criminal activity?
45
posted on
09/05/2003 6:36:26 PM PDT
by
gitmo
(Americans are learning world geography ... one war at a time.)
To: demlosers
State Senator and Republican recall candidate Tom McClintock said Thursday Colorado has already passed a law rejecting the validity of California driver's licenses should Gov. Davis sign the bill. Need another source. Anybody got a Bill number? Or title? Vote? Anything from Colorado? Can't believe this law passed that quietly.
To: demlosers
The office said they have no way to verify whether or not an applicant is a citizen. Voter registration forms are signed under penalty of perjury, they said, and the citizenship question is simply answered, "on the honor system." This of course, is the reason for this entire new law. Votes for rats! I am so angry you can't imagine!!!
47
posted on
09/05/2003 7:03:36 PM PDT
by
ladyinred
(The left have blood on their hands.)
To: My2Cents
Do they even issue birth certificates in Mexico?
Yes. They're called "Certificada de Acta de Nacimiento." Each neighborhood in Mexico is run by the local corrupt lawyers, usually PRI Party hacks, who oversee all aspects of social life there.
If this law stands then we need to demand proof of citizenship for ALL registered voters.
To: Scenic Sounds
Actually, the Feds control the air, so they could simply have the FAA pass a rule making a CDL an invalid form of ID to board any airplane within the borders of the US.
That happens, and this stupid law would be repealed within hours.
49
posted on
09/05/2003 7:12:30 PM PDT
by
bootyist-monk
(Thunder makes all the noise; lightning gets the job done)
To: bootyist-monk
Actually, the Feds control the air, so they could simply have the FAA pass a rule making a CDL an invalid form of ID to board any airplane within the borders of the US. That happens, and this stupid law would be repealed within hours.
That sounds like a great idea and it might work for most states, but it won't work in California.
All of us in California have private jets. ;-)
50
posted on
09/05/2003 7:15:18 PM PDT
by
Scenic Sounds
("Don't mind people grinnin' in your face." - Son House)
To: demlosers
"enabling illegal aliens to fraudulently vote" That was the plan wasn't it?
51
posted on
09/05/2003 7:41:44 PM PDT
by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
To: Scenic Sounds
Well, I don't have a private jet, so since you do, may I hitch a free ride with you the next time you're off to an exoctic locale? ;-)
I was hoping the Feds could intervene by way of "homeland security." ;-)
52
posted on
09/05/2003 8:20:52 PM PDT
by
onyx
To: My2Cents
" I guess their rationale is that if they pull someone over, they'd rather have some ID on the person rather than none at all."
Then why not just require illegals to have a valid license from Guadalajara or Tehran or Islamabad or Gaza or Riyadh ? It would cut the red tape for the illegals/terrorists,which is apparently the goal of the Democrats.Leno just talked about this in his monologue, made reference to terrorists getting licenses and then said-"why doesn't California just go ahead and issue them a pilot's license at the same time "? This bill should be tied directly to the Democrats and nationalized as an issue,ala Willie Horton. I wonder if the Democrats will have the signing on Sept 11 ?
To: Thank You Rush
54
posted on
09/05/2003 9:27:47 PM PDT
by
So Cal Rocket
(Free Miguel, Priscilla and Bill!)
To: demlosers
Join Us
Your One Thread To All The California Recall News Threads!
Want on our daily or major news ping lists? Freepmail DoctorZin.
To: SSN558
"The origin of black slaves in early America being 2/3 of a person by law, is often misunderstood. It's purpose was to increase the power of slave states by giving them more representives in congress."
Actually, counting blacks as less than a full person weakened the slaveholding states, giving them fewer representatives. The 2/3 compromise is cited by the anti-slavery people as their way of ensuring the southern states didn't get too strong so slavery could eventually be ended.
56
posted on
09/05/2003 10:51:20 PM PDT
by
ntnychik
To: Centurion2000
I think we, legal California, USA citizens should go to the DMV in mass and apply for fake idenity Driver Lic. We should give names like Jane Doe or Maria DeMented or Abi Ido, etc. We should be obvious that we want atleast 3 lic for 3 votes to level the playing field and reflect the insanity of this selfish agenda. I gave my thumb print and a birth certificate and criminals will have the same document breeder with NOTHING!!! Free border crossing, voting access, gun purchasing. We must display some civil disobedience in contrast to the absolute criminal sell out by this state senate and governor. Yes and we need to work with Mc Clintock on the referendum too but we must do something NOW. Clog the lines at the DMV. Already the Border Patrol has had an increase in illegal border crossings and the reason given is, "we were going to get our lic." What do you think, should we make it impossible for the DMV to process any illegals until we get the referendum thru?
To: ntnychik
Is it not true that 2/3's was a compomise that was reached in order to get the slave states to sign the constitution ? I recall reading that the New England states did not want slaves to count at all.
58
posted on
09/06/2003 2:58:23 AM PDT
by
SSN558
(Be on the lookout for Black White-Supremacists)
To: onyx
Well, I don't have a private jet, so since you do, may I hitch a free ride with you the next time you're off to an exoctic locale? ;-)LOL. Oh, absolutely. It just wouldn't seem exotic without you. ;-)
I was hoping the Feds could intervene by way of "homeland security." ;-)
I'm sure Tom Ridge is doing a great job, but fighting terrorists is one thing and taking on the DMV is another. The DMV is tough. ;-)
59
posted on
09/06/2003 6:59:55 AM PDT
by
Scenic Sounds
("Don't mind people grinnin' in your face." - Son House)
To: ALOHA RONNIE
See also THIS thread:
One Chance to Kill SB60 (Illegal Drivers Licenses), Says McClintock
(CA FReeper Alert, PLEASE READ)
Tom McClintock, KRLA radio, KABC radio | truthkeeper
Posted on 09/05/2003 4:59 PM PDT by truthkeeper
Okay, a little voice told me to put up this thread...
Since I heard Sen. McClintock explain this plan twice in two days, during two different radio station interviews, I thought it would be a good idea to synopsis it. (I think is an excellent idea.)
As we have all pretty much figured, the way to do something about the passage of the illegal alien driver's license law, which will be signed any moment by our traitorous, corrupt governor, lies in our "ruby slippers," our wonderful referendum process. According to McClintock, the California Republican Assembly (a group which endorsed him, and the largest of its kind in California), already is buzzing about a plan to challenge the new law "once Davis's pen hits the paper." I have already checked their website and found nothing as of yet; however, McClintock says as soon as he has more information it will be linked on his website. (Let's keep watching for this.)
Here's how it would work. Signatures on petitions would be gathered as with the recall; however, the good news is that he said only a relatively small number would be required. (Off the top of his head, McClintock didn't know the exact amount, but he thought only about 1/4 or 1/5 the amount required for the recall. It should be a lead pipe cinch to get this on this one, IMHO.)
Of course, the signatures need to be collected in the proper, legal manner - I don't have the details to post at this time, but we can get that info readily - and then appropriately forwarded. The good news, according to Sen. McClintock, is that as soon as they are collected and forwarded as required by law, this ridiculous new law MUST BE IMMEDIATELY STAYED UNTIL THE NEXT SCHEDULED ELECTION. That would be MARCH 2004 if we can get the signatures quickly enough. And remember, this idiotic law doesn't go into effect until Jan. 1, 2004. Wouldn't it be wonderful if we could beat it to the punch entirely? Does anyone seriously have any doubts we'd knock this thing out in a referendum election?
CLICK HERE for the rest of that thread
60
posted on
09/06/2003 9:41:20 AM PDT
by
RonDog
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson