Skip to comments.
MSNBC Reports Hillary Considering 2004
MSNBC
| 8/28/03
Posted on 08/28/2003 12:13:59 PM PDT by Merovingian
MSNBC had an item on NEW rumblings about HRC running in 2004.. It was in conjunction with more on Wes Clark also getting serious about a run..Mentioned something about a 'high level mtg' that the OTHER Dem candidates were informed of.... Ickes has formed a 'soft money group' which could benefit HRC, and, again, some high level mtg about the possibility of her running. ..Nachman and Bill Press will be discussing this SOON on msnbc...tune in NOW.
TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; commnderinchiefhrc; election2004; electionpresident; hillary; hillaryclinton
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360, 361-380, 381-400, 401-410 next last
To: Howlin; Dutchy; nutmeg; Doctor Raoul; n.y.muggs; Mia T; RaceBannon
Thanks for the ping. Opened Drudge prior to coming here and felt a knot in my stomach not felt since the Bush/Gore fiasco. If she does run, it's only with the assurance she will win and all the illegal, sneaky pete tactics are in place. After her Senate coup, where the thumbs up during our freeps far outnumbered the thumbs down, I put nothing past her. Wish I could say bring it on, but with Dubya's poll numbers declining, this isn't sitting well with me.
361
posted on
08/28/2003 4:38:52 PM PDT
by
StarFan
To: Tarl
but then I never would've guessed her husband would be found re-electable. After peanut prez, I learned never to think never.
362
posted on
08/28/2003 4:39:21 PM PDT
by
mombonn
(¡Viva Bush/Cheney!)
To: qam1
Thats not pro-Hillary, its anti-Pataki. Lesser of two evils doesn't count.
363
posted on
08/28/2003 4:39:59 PM PDT
by
kylaka
To: SouthParkRepublican
As she aptly put it Never underestimate what that evil bitch is capable of. Remember, Hitler was popular too. You're a lucky guy, that wife of yours is certainly an able student of history!
To: kylaka
True,
If Satan himself was the 3rd party candidate in that election, I vote for him
365
posted on
08/28/2003 4:42:37 PM PDT
by
qam1
(Don't Patikify New Jersey)
To: woodyinscc
GWB has yet to play his cards, I would not bet against him. he is holding a lot of information close to the vest, and will raise the ante shortly. I always compare Bush to "the Roadrunner". There will be a lot of anvils dropping from the sky in 2004, if not sooner. I fully expect Osama's head will be served up sometime around August 2004.
366
posted on
08/28/2003 4:43:27 PM PDT
by
kylaka
To: 1Old Pro; Merovingian
I hope she resigns her Senate seat to "focus" on the race. There should be a law that one MUST resign when they seek higher office as they cannot focus on two fronts. Unfortunately she will never risk giving up her seat unless her victory is in the bag.
A year or more ago there waas a post on the official registration for 2004 Presidential candidates, and Hill's name was already on it..Does ANYONE know what I am talking about?? Not sure but I do recall that her name was on the list of 2000 Presidential candidates along with albore.
367
posted on
08/28/2003 4:46:58 PM PDT
by
StarFan
Comment #368 Removed by Moderator
To: votelife
No, Picking Hillary over Pataki is choosing the more Conservative candidate.
For one while Hillary failed at socializing medicine where as Pataki has nearly suceeded,
There are 14 million less people in NY than California but still Pataki taxes and spends more than Grey Davis.
369
posted on
08/28/2003 4:54:21 PM PDT
by
qam1
(Don't Patikify New Jersey)
To: Merovingian; montag813
While he regards his junior officers with watchful suspicion, he customarily accords the lower ranks little more than arrogant contempt. A veteran of Clark's tenure at Fort Hood recalls the general's "massive tantrum because the privates and sergeants and wives in the crowded (canteen) checkout lines didn't jump out of the way fast enough to let him through".Jesus, it's another Gray Davis! Does this anal obsessive prune eat tofu berry shakes for breakfast too?
The perfect running mate for her heinous.
370
posted on
08/28/2003 4:54:28 PM PDT
by
TheSpottedOwl
(This cow is independently owned and operated)
To: hispanarepublicana
Hitlery running for President will make the race like shooting fish in a barrel for our side. Bet you thought the same thing in '92. Anyone who thinks she has no shot at winning is being incredibly naive. It stuns me to see people who would EVER write off the Clintons after what we've witnessed.
There is a very real possibility of her not only running, but winning. I can think of nothing more frightening, but it's very real.
MM
To: qam1
so do you think Hillary would tax and spend less than Pataki?
372
posted on
08/28/2003 4:59:31 PM PDT
by
votelife
(Free Bill Pryor)
To: Merovingian
I bet Hillary & Co. did some internal polling and found that she was more likely to beat Bush in 2004 than beat Giuliani in a 2006 Senate race.
373
posted on
08/28/2003 4:59:52 PM PDT
by
tellw
To: qam1
With the main difference being more and more Soccer Moms are now from the More Conservative Gen-Xers instead of the self absorbed Liberal Baby Boomers that were the majority back in the 1990's. Oh boy, are you ever wrong. I just got back from a meeting of about 25 of them as I have children and am forced to interact with this brainless mob of sheep.
374
posted on
08/28/2003 4:59:56 PM PDT
by
riri
To: qam1
Let me remind you also that it was the SOCCER mom, Republican woman crossover vote that elected Janet Napalitano into the governor's office here in Arizona. She ran on a platform of children, education and raising taxes on business. And she did not try to hide it.
375
posted on
08/28/2003 5:01:46 PM PDT
by
riri
To: Orangedog
Well evidently I know several of the latter category. Moms with kids who play soccer. And they are concerned about the country and their kids and our troops and America. They aren't ditzy or evil or Bush-bashers. And they call themselves soccer moms.
Prairie
376
posted on
08/28/2003 5:03:53 PM PDT
by
prairiebreeze
(The UN got a wake up call. And has chosen to go back to sleep.)
To: My2Cents
No, because except for replacing our income tax with a 12% tariff, he's doing about all he can do to influence the economy. The electorate isn't that sophisticated, though.
To: TheSpottedOwl
Buwahahahahaaa...also ...Hackworth says Clark is known as the "Perfumed Prince"...
To: GraniteStateConservative
Maybe what we need is someone with the guts to come out and say there is very little the federal government can do to grow the economy, but a lot it can do to ruin it.
379
posted on
08/28/2003 5:05:10 PM PDT
by
My2Cents
("I'm the party pooper..." -- Arnold in "Kindergarten Cop.")
To: prairiebreeze
They can call themselves purple hyenas for all I care. But if they wish to associate themselves the vapid puppets of the left, they'll have no one but themselves to blame for being painted with the same broad brush. It's a badge of shame in the eyes of a lot of other people.
380
posted on
08/28/2003 5:20:47 PM PDT
by
Orangedog
(Soccer-Moms are the biggest threat to your freedoms and the republic !)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360, 361-380, 381-400, 401-410 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson