Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MSNBC Reports Hillary Considering 2004
MSNBC | 8/28/03

Posted on 08/28/2003 12:13:59 PM PDT by Merovingian

MSNBC had an item on NEW rumblings about HRC running in 2004.. It was in conjunction with more on Wes Clark also getting serious about a run..Mentioned something about a 'high level mtg' that the OTHER Dem candidates were informed of.... Ickes has formed a 'soft money group' which could benefit HRC, and, again, some high level mtg about the possibility of her running. ..Nachman and Bill Press will be discussing this SOON on msnbc...tune in NOW.


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; commnderinchiefhrc; election2004; electionpresident; hillary; hillaryclinton
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 401-410 next last
To: Don Corleone

341 posted on 08/28/2003 3:31:46 PM PDT by ChadGore (Kakkate Koi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator
He's not McGovern. He can, and will, move sharply toward the political center for the general election if he gets the nomination. KEEP THOSE CLIPPINGS regarding his current far-left bloviations, because come '04 the media will "forget" them to serve their party.

Very Good Advice!!!

342 posted on 08/28/2003 3:40:42 PM PDT by Mo1 (http://www.favewavs.com/wavs/cartoons/spdemocrats.wav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: Merovingian
and now this on DRUDGE:


There is said to be some fire to the smoke this Labor Day weekend over a report that Hillary Clinton has set a date to discuss a run for the presidency... Hillary and her advisers, including her husband the ex-president, her money-men and pollsters, will meet shortly after Labor Day -- September 6,- to discuss whether or not she should go for it! MORE... 'I have learned from two staffers for current presidential candidates that they were approached by Hillary associates about discussing her possible 2004 bid for the White House,' CongressionalQuarterlyMSNBC's Craig Crawford said late Thursday...
343 posted on 08/28/2003 3:51:36 PM PDT by Merovingian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies]

To: woodyinscc
This man is also dangerous, a sub-ordinate General refused an order from him saying "I will not let you make me resposible for WW3"

Wasn't that the order that Clark gave for the soldiers to FIRE on the Russian troops landing in the airport ?

344 posted on 08/28/2003 3:58:07 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (We are crushing our enemies, seeing him driven before us and hearing the lamentations of the liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: Merovingian
Somehow Dean needs to buy more life insurance if Hillary makes her move...unpleasant "accidents" follow the Clintons, usually to people knowing too much personal stuff or worse...someone "in the way" of their progress.

I would say she is nationally "unelectable", but then I never would've guessed her husband would be found re-electable. If she enters, there's no further proof needed that the Liberal Front is desparate.

Any who oppose liberalism should energize their party base to get out and vote. A vote for Hillary is a vote for Occupation, that's how it felt when her husband occupied the White House. Remove a country's religious foundation and you make them susceptible to attack from within. This type of "warfare" negates our country's great military. Our worse enemies are ourselves.
345 posted on 08/28/2003 4:01:07 PM PDT by Tarl ("Men killing men, feeling no pain...the world is a gutter - ENUFF Z'NUFF")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tarl
If she enters, there's no further proof needed that the Liberal Front is desparate.

AND/OR no further proof needed that she is an opportunist who senses Bush's increasing vulnerability...and the current Democratic candidates' weaknesses.

346 posted on 08/28/2003 4:05:26 PM PDT by Merovingian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies]

To: Captain Peter Blood
His best issue to run on is the terrorism platform that he can keep America safer than Hillary,

And if the proves not to be true and the economy remains weak? Only way Hillary enters the race is if she is sure that she won't be embarrassed at the polls. This just may all turn out to be internal party power positioning stuff -- we'll see.

Richard W.

347 posted on 08/28/2003 4:06:36 PM PDT by arete (Greenspan is a ruling class elitist and closet socialist who is destroying the economy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies]

To: abner
If she runs I will probably close my office and spend until the next election fighting her.

Pick me up, will you?

348 posted on 08/28/2003 4:08:15 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: Merovingian
Bring it on. I'd rather deal with her now than later. The faster we deal with the Hildebeast, the better.
349 posted on 08/28/2003 4:10:55 PM PDT by Doctor Freeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arete
what should scare us is that she will only run if she thinks she can win and she will run someday now or '08...
350 posted on 08/28/2003 4:12:28 PM PDT by votelife (Free Bill Pryor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies]

To: Orangedog
Don't be so sure about that. The soccer moms put her and her husband into the White House TWICE. Soccer moms are a dim-witted emotional bunch who respond well to polititians who are skilled at using children as props in campaign ads and pawns in any area of life. They have no loyalty and short memories. 9/11 will not help the republicans guaranty their vote.

Well the soccer moms of today are different from the ones that put the Clinton's in office,

With the main difference being more and more Soccer Moms are now from the More Conservative Gen-Xers instead of the self absorbed Liberal Baby Boomers that were the majority back in the 1990's.

351 posted on 08/28/2003 4:17:40 PM PDT by qam1 (Don't Patikify New Jersey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I'm hoping you will be a part of the VRWC II.
352 posted on 08/28/2003 4:17:41 PM PDT by abner (In search of a witty tag line...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I'm hoping you will be a part of the VRWC II.
353 posted on 08/28/2003 4:17:41 PM PDT by abner (In search of a witty tag line...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies]

To: Orangedog
Don't be so sure about that. The soccer moms put her and her husband into the White House TWICE. Soccer moms are a dim-witted emotional bunch who respond well to polititians who are skilled at using children as props in campaign ads and pawns in any area of life. They have no loyalty and short memories. 9/11 will not help the republicans guaranty their vote.

Well the soccer moms of today are different from the ones that put the Clinton's in office,

With the main difference being more and more Soccer Moms are now from the More Conservative Gen-Xers instead of the self absorbed Liberal Baby Boomers that were the majority back in the 1990's.

354 posted on 08/28/2003 4:17:41 PM PDT by qam1 (Don't Patikify New Jersey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Orangedog
Don't be so sure about that. The soccer moms put her and her husband into the White House TWICE. Soccer moms are a dim-witted emotional bunch who respond well to polititians who are skilled at using children as props in campaign ads and pawns in any area of life. They have no loyalty and short memories. 9/11 will not help the republicans guaranty their vote.

Well the soccer moms of today are different from the ones that put the Clinton's in office,

With the main difference being more and more Soccer Moms are now from the More Conservative Gen-Xers instead of the self absorbed Liberal Baby Boomers that were the majority back in the 1990's.

355 posted on 08/28/2003 4:18:04 PM PDT by qam1 (Don't Patikify New Jersey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000
Don't count on it.

All the forces in hell;

All the idiots left of . . . Arnold;

Almost all the professors in all the universities;

Almost all the Chicanos;

Almost all the blacks;

Almost all Hollyweed, Malibu . . .

Virtually all the homosexuals;

Virtually all the bikers and druggies;

Virtually all the globalists;

Virtually all the so called 'free thinkers;'

Virtually all the infanticide eggers-on;

Virtually all the corrupt politicians and their followers;

All the slugs and poisonous snakes and spiders;

All the horse biscuits in New England;

. . .

will fight for her in the streets and in every strategic voting fraud office between here and Siberia.

Add in all the media moguls and Hollyweed brain-deads . . .

Bwitch Shrillery Antoinette de Fosterizer de Marx de Machiavelli de Kevorkian de Sade

must not be counted out until she's on her . . . last legs, breaths, appearances as a public figure.

She'd engineer a forced coup if she thought she could achieve it.

Avoid underestimating her evil or her resourcefulness or the masses who go gahgah at the thought of her personna.

TRUE Reality and logic probably have little to do with it.
356 posted on 08/28/2003 4:19:24 PM PDT by Quix (DEFEAT her unroyal lowness, her hideous heinous Bwitch Shrillery Antoinette de Fosterizer de MarxNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: robjna
I will stake my house on the fact that she would never win. PS the dirt that would be dug up would just be a reminder of the 8 years of BS we put with and no one wants to go back there

Please don't stake your house on it as you're assuming whatever dirt is dug up will be revealed by the liberal media. When she ran for the Senate, it was predicted the tough NY press would never give her a pass and she'd be held to some pointed questions. I'm still waiting to hear one asked!

357 posted on 08/28/2003 4:25:52 PM PDT by StarFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: kylaka
I can honestly say, I have never seen a pro Hillary comment by any regular poster on FR in the entire 5 1/2 years I've been here. Not even One.

I hate to say it but I think I come the closest.

If was still living in New York
And If Hillary didn't run for President or lost in 2004
And if in 2006 it was George Pataki who challanged her for her Senate seat

Without any hesitation I would cast my vote for her.

358 posted on 08/28/2003 4:26:15 PM PDT by qam1 (Don't Patikify New Jersey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: qam1
wow, I've NEVER seen a FR admit they'd vote for Hillary. I guess you really can't stand Pataki, and I'm guessing you're more of a moderate than a conservative?
359 posted on 08/28/2003 4:33:02 PM PDT by votelife (Free Bill Pryor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 358 | View Replies]

To: robjna
I will stake my house on the fact that she would never win.

I would to, Though I live in an apartment but if I had a house I would put it on the line.

Though it wouldn't be that much of a bet because if She wins the presidentcy, I am moving to the only country in this world that is becoming freer and freer as the days go by, Russia

360 posted on 08/28/2003 4:34:53 PM PDT by qam1 (Don't Patikify New Jersey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 401-410 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson