Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
To: journey7873; All
To all:
Do not post the text of this "article" or even a link to it. It is inappropriate material for FR and will be deleted.
Thanks,
Jim
2 posted on
08/27/2003 4:01:17 PM PDT by
Jim Robinson
(Conservative by nature... Republican by spirit... Patriot by heart... AND... ANTI-Liberal by GOD!)
Oui Vey!
To: journey7873
I will not comment on the text, other than to say, I would love to see him explain now how his morals have changed since this interview. His moral values stunk then. I willl withold any comments on what he said because this is a family friendly site.
6 posted on
08/27/2003 4:05:21 PM PDT by
dogbyte12
To: journey7873
Is this the best the Clinton/Grey Davis team has got?
To: journey7873
What is your fascination with full frontal male nudity?
To: journey7873
the interview will probably win him endorsements from all the major homosexual groups in California.
13 posted on
08/27/2003 4:08:35 PM PDT by
ambrose
To: journey7873
*Sigh* What a pathetic attempt at slander. I haven't changed since 77' either. . .
GWB used to drink!!! *Shock*
14 posted on
08/27/2003 4:09:25 PM PDT by
Tempest
(Tom McNader, Cruz Bustamante couldn't have asked for a better friend.)
To: journey7873
Wow, I bet Bill Clinton is envious of Arnold. He's just as liberal but way more of a pervert.
16 posted on
08/27/2003 4:09:53 PM PDT by
ElkGroveDan
(It's time for Arnold to stop splitting the Republican vote and step aside for the good of the party)
To: journey7873
Most of the text cannot be published in the media, because it is so explicit. However, the only really damaging thing in the text is the part about using drugs. Other than that, he was candid about a good sex life. So what? Nobody had to buy the magazine - and he wasn't getting laid in the oval office while on the taxpayers' payroll.
To: journey7873
I also question the labeling of it as a "dirty" campaign trick.
Making unproven accusations or starting whispering campaigns based purely on speculation -- stuff like that is dirty campaign stuff. Or when some people tried to make an issue about the race of Phil Gramm's wife.
But what's so "dirty" about calling to everyone's attention an interview that Ahh-nald gave to a magazine? I mean, what did he expect when he started running?
20 posted on
08/27/2003 4:11:06 PM PDT by
gdani
To: journey7873
Wow, sex and pot... How repulsive to most Kalifornia moderate voters :)
To: journey7873
Yoiu might as well name this one, "Davis's plumbers make their second major move."
To: journey7873
So he was a kid in the 70's, what was Bustamonte doing??? Huffington???? Davis???? The answer is the same for each.
26 posted on
08/27/2003 4:12:12 PM PDT by
Porterville
(Et tu liberal?? Et tu???)
To: journey7873
I think that his exploits may win him votes in urban communities where his life back then sounds like rap songs today. Maybe Bustamante won't get as many minority votes as he thinks.
To: journey7873
Yeah, this is relevant. Wild sex in 77. Now if it can be proved that he wore a leisure suit and listend to disco? That would be another story.
31 posted on
08/27/2003 4:13:33 PM PDT by
socal_parrot
(I'm here all week, tell your friends.)
To: journey7873
Drudge is just a hack journalist [sic] who has no class. It's obvious he's no Arnold fan and will dig up the dirt on him for the Dems. I wonder if he's on their payroll. What is the point of bringing up something Arnold said 26 years ago? People change. They grow up, get married, have children. I'd be curious to know how many FReepers lifestyles and views have changed somewhat in the last two decades or so. I'd guess more have than haven't.
32 posted on
08/27/2003 4:13:47 PM PDT by
ejdrapes
To: journey7873
Pfft! That is not dirty.
You want to see dirty, just wait until the RINO crew feels threatened by McClintock, coming soon to a political theatre near you!
36 posted on
08/27/2003 4:15:07 PM PDT by
thoughtomator
(Welcome to the Iraq Roach Motel - Islamofascists check in, but they don't check out!)
To: journey7873
This may get him the Democratic Presidential nomination!
37 posted on
08/27/2003 4:15:25 PM PDT by
drstevej
To: journey7873
Don't know if he ever gave that interview or if this was fabricated, but sounds like he just rounded up the Libertarian vote.
39 posted on
08/27/2003 4:15:31 PM PDT by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: journey7873
This whole thing seems... fishy. I mean, the interview was awfully descriptive for a guy who wasn't fluent in English for years into the 80's...
To be honest, I really don't care about this revelation. Does anyone expect someone living in his lifestyle to have an innocent history? Not that I am condoning it, but I could give two figs for this (or Bush's drug/alchohol past). I am voting for these candidates today, not 20 years ago. If this all happened in 1997 I would be much more concerned...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson