To: journey7873
Drudge is just a hack journalist [sic] who has no class. It's obvious he's no Arnold fan and will dig up the dirt on him for the Dems. I wonder if he's on their payroll. What is the point of bringing up something Arnold said 26 years ago? People change. They grow up, get married, have children. I'd be curious to know how many FReepers lifestyles and views have changed somewhat in the last two decades or so. I'd guess more have than haven't.
32 posted on
08/27/2003 4:13:47 PM PDT by
ejdrapes
To: ejdrapes
What is the point of bringing up something Arnold said 26 years ago? People change. They grow up, get married, have children."It is all about sex! Nothing to see here, move on."
Would love to see the responses here if the man giving that interview was one William Jefferson Blythe Clinton.
45 posted on
08/27/2003 4:18:30 PM PDT by
ambrose
To: ejdrapes
It's obvious he's no Arnold fan and will dig up the dirt on him for the Dems. I wonder if he's on their payroll. Matt Drudge is a hard-core PRO-LIFE advocate. He hates all pro-abortion candidates and politicians. It has nothing to do with the Democrats, IMHO.
85 posted on
08/27/2003 4:30:06 PM PDT by
SunStar
(Democrats piss me off!)
To: ejdrapes
What is the point of bringing up something Arnold said 26 years ago?
What is the point of bringing up something Bill Clinton and his brother did 26 years ago? But Freepers were fixated on Clinton's alleged sex antics of the 1970s and 80s - - - but DON'T TELL US ABOUT ARNOLD, AND THAT'S AN ORDER!
To: ejdrapes
Not to mention our President, GW Bush who was quite the partier in his youth.
103 posted on
08/27/2003 4:36:06 PM PDT by
Hildy
(Vote McClintock and get Bustamante.... hope you're happy....amigos.)
To: ejdrapes
"Drudge is just a hack journalist [sic] who has no class. It's obvious he's no Arnold fan and will dig up the dirt on him for the Dems. I wonder if he's on their payroll."
I'm positive that Arnold's side knew it would come out.
It is usually better to control the bad information, yourself.
Maybe Drudge is working for Arnold's benefit, to get it out early, rather than leave it to the opposition, as as far as time and place.
Who says it is the dems bringing this out? Wouldn't it be advantageous for McClintock or Ueberroth to have a terrible item hit Arnold?
To: ejdrapes
I also have been VERY disappointed in how Drudge is handling the recall candidates. ALL of his "hit" pieces have been on Arnold, none on the sleazebag democrats or their unholy associations. He can print what he wants, but he's lost me checking his headlines as often as I used to do.
159 posted on
08/27/2003 4:56:13 PM PDT by
alwaysconservative
(Which party represents the working people?)
To: ejdrapes
I suspect Drudge has more than a few pictures of men in his collection..........
249 posted on
08/27/2003 5:26:21 PM PDT by
OldFriend
((Dems inhabit a parallel universe))
To: ejdrapes
It's old news. Let's move on.
263 posted on
08/27/2003 5:34:19 PM PDT by
zarf
(Dan Rather is god.)
To: ejdrapes
Drudge has turned into an on-line version of the National Enquirer ... no wait, not that high class, maybe Globe.
442 posted on
08/27/2003 7:42:19 PM PDT by
altura
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson