What is the point of bringing up something Bill Clinton and his brother did 26 years ago? But Freepers were fixated on Clinton's alleged sex antics of the 1970s and 80s - - - but DON'T TELL US ABOUT ARNOLD, AND THAT'S AN ORDER!
The thing I find most comical is that most young men wants to have sex with as many women as possible (or at least 98% do). Most younger people have smoked pot. The ones that criticize Arnold the loudest about this stuff are just envious. What he did 20 years ago amounts to nothing. He grew up. I wish I coud have had the sex romps he did when I was 29...LMAO
I certainly wasn't one of them. In fact I didn't even agree with impeaching Clinton because of Monicagate because I thought there were far worse impeachable offences. If it was known that Arnold still had a problem today (or within the last 5-10 years) with drugs or infidelity I would say this is relevant. But it's obvious to me this is nothing more than a smear tactic by Drudge (and no doubt the Dems will run with it). Maybe it's because Arnold is pro-choice and Drudge is not. But let's not forget Drudge ran on his website several times (even the same day Arnold was on Leno)that he was NOT going to run and then of course he announces he is running on Leno, leaving Drudge with egg on his face. Perhaps that has something to do with Drudge's campaign against him.