OUI, OUI: ARNOLD PUMPS UP ORGIES AND DOPE IN '77 SHOCK INTERVIEW

Drudge Report ^

[journey7873]

Posted on Drudge and Smoking Gun: The California recall campaign is officially getting dirty...

[68 grunt]

I admit it, so what? I repeat, I want your type of social conservative to go the way of the dinasaur, extinct.

[tame]

I want your type of social conservative to go the way of the dinasaur, extinct.

The GOP would go the way of the dinosaur without social conservatives.

[Hoverbug]

I think I'm finally getting it!

If the "intolerant whackjob" social conservative is an elected official in a position to set policy and guide the country, lets say, President of the United States, he has far less ability and power to destroy the country than the "intolerant whackjob" social conservatives who make up his base, and you'd vote for him.

Thus, I should feel perfectly justified in voting for someone I believe is taking this country to ruin the fastest.

I feel so much smarter now.

You're starting to grow on me :-)

Hb

[68 grunt]

... You're starting to grow on me :-)

Aristotle would be proud ;^)

[68 grunt]

Actually, I was holding my crotch when I wrote it!

[68 grunt]

You finally understand.

[my_pointy_head_is_sharp]

He still supports street morals - - pro-abortion and gay adoption.

Abortion is legal; that's a fact. Why does one need to be "pro" abortion if it's already legal? All you're saying is that you're in favor of killing unborn child. What kind of a moral statement is that?!

It's doubtful that abortion is ever going to be made illegal. In fact, the limit to how far you can go has already been reached. Right now, you can legally kill your child to within seconds of its being born naturally. It's called partial birth abortion. The only way they can extend the limit is to to make it legal to kill your child AFTER it's been born. And some people are indeed advocating that, e.g. Peter Singer.

This is an extreme moral issue. Being anti-abortion is a position that all conservatives should hold. Otherwise, why call yourself a conservative? This is the main issue, folks. There's nothing else that determines your moral fiber. Personally, I'd rather have an Arnold who did sex & drugs and who was AGAINST abortion, rather than an Arnold who was as pure as the driven snow and who was FOR abortion. Unfortunately, he's on the wrong side on both.

It's all comes down to character. And nothing determines character better than where you stand on the abortion issue. And in Arnold's case, he's got two strikes against him.

[nmh]

You:"You knew better at 29?"

Sure did! Age wasn't a barrier for me in determining what is right and wrong. I suppose it is the values and beliefs you are raised with when little.

"That just proves that you are unfit to be Kalifornia governor."

Wouldn't want to regulate the den of vipers. I'd say it's rather hopeless there.

[Thumper1960]

I wanna see ANYONE tame Kalifornia. It's beyond hopeless.

[Reverend Bob]

Reread your own post. The second question is: "What about OTHER drugs...?" (Caps added).

Sheeesh!

Before calling someone a liar you should at least get your facts straight. Or is this technique of character assassination something you learned from Maureen Dowd?

[ambrose]

What about "OTHER" drugs **besides** steroids. You know, before you "call me out" on something, you could at least click on the links that I provided so that you have the entire context of the quoted statements. Or if you prefer, you can stick your head back in the sand and go on rooting for that lying RINO.

[Reverend Bob]

Actually, the example of Minnesota in 1998 is a good one to follow. Sadly, it does not have the meaning you ascribe to it. Ventura won for two reasons:

1. He ran as a celebrity against two very gray, career politicians.

2. He ran as an anti-tax candidate who was libertarian on social issues.

The result is that he got votes from disaffected Democrats and Independents leery of either party, while Republicans, save for some RINOS, stuck with Coleman (who, by the way, is not exactly what most here would consider a true conservative). Ventura also brought in a lot of new voters who, energized by his no tax rhetoric, ended up voting Republican on the down ticket races. The real payoff didn't come until 2002 when people who wouldn't have considered voting Republican in 1998 were finally comfortable enough to make that move. And why did they make that move? Because they'd had four years of a Republican House and liked what they'd seen.

The point is that California, politically, is where Minnesota was 10-20 years ago. To win swing voters and build a winning majority takes time. Here in Minnesota it took eight years of a liberal Republican Governor, followed by four years of an (essentially) Democrat Governor and a Republican House, before we conservatives were able to earn a shot at real political control.

I'm not sure what to think of Arnold, but parallels to Ventura are clear. If he provides a foot in the door to a unified California Republican party and a more conservative state government, then he will be a good thing. Arnold is not the be-all and end-all, but he may be a step towards a future Republican/Conservative majority in California.

Incrementalism works. I've seen it firsthand here in Minnesota.

[Fred]

I had no idea that so many OINKING PIGS posted at freerepublic.. Way too many comments saying "he was young", "what did you do when you were young".... etc..etc...blah.blah.blah...

Well, sorry, I did not do what King Oinker, Arnold, did and am sorry to read that, apparently, many of you posters have.

The head oinker, Arnold S., said he wanted to be in the movies. Well from this article, it looks like he was in training for the HARDCORE PORN INDUSTRY and proud of it.

[unspun]

Thank you for your note.
But let's not worry; Bustamante won't win.
Best to vote for the morally supportable candidate.

[unspun]

If Arnold wins, it will likely be due to picking up many Democrat voters. And that is something that should make California's conservatives think, whether from Rio Linda or elsewhere.

[MrLeRoy]

What should it make them think?

[unspun]

Think.