Skip to comments.
OUI, OUI: ARNOLD PUMPS UP ORGIES AND DOPE IN '77 SHOCK INTERVIEW
Drudge Report ^
Posted on 08/27/2003 3:59:45 PM PDT by journey7873
Posted on Drudge and Smoking Gun: The California recall campaign is officially getting dirty...
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: 26kdollarwelfaretom; arnold; big10inch; bobmulholland; bustamentebooster; disgusting; drudgethinksfriswhat; gain4inchesovernight; lookingforbooty; moretocome; morons; schwarzenpervert; schwarzenrino; sick; theorgycandidate; vote4character; vote4mcclintock; warningshot; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 681-685 next last
To: ambrose
Ambrose! Stop being so delusional. If McClintock's voters had any kind of numbers, Kalifornia would not be in the mess they are in. Gee, it's like a guy named Swartz trying to run for a PLO assembly seat.
To: 68 grunt
We are witnessing the breakdown of the stereotypical 'holier than thou' moralist Republican.
This stereotype has been used by Dims to lure young voters and indoctrinate them. The Republicans, always led by older men, let this happen and perpetuated it.
This is a good thing for the party. No more 'intolerance' issue.
162
posted on
08/27/2003 4:57:50 PM PDT
by
At _War_With_Liberals
(If Hillary ever takes the oath of office, she will be the last President the US will ever have. -RR)
To: ambrose
great find!!!
163
posted on
08/27/2003 4:58:24 PM PDT
by
ElkGroveDan
(It's time for Arnold to stop splitting the Republican vote and step aside for the good of the party)
To: DoughtyOne
.... I still believe you are that person.I believe I saw this, as you did, and was going to comment similarly before I read your post.
164
posted on
08/27/2003 4:58:25 PM PDT
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
To: DoughtyOne
I would hope you have more sense than to actually think "saying McClintock can't win" in any way approaches the level of damage a post and thread like this could cause.This thread is causing damage? Man, you're weird.
To: LibWhacker; prarie earth; Pokey78; DoughtyOne; Tempest; AmericaUnited; Porterville; section9
We're going to be accused of hypocrisy in a way that resonates with a lot of voters out there for on the one hand criticizing Bill Clinton for his many failings, then a few years later jumping wholeheartedly on the Arnold bandwagon. Somebody pass this man a cigar! Exactly. I was having a good day with (R)nold, he seemed sincere on Hannity, but the jury is still out on him fiscally.
I know most of you are big (R)nold fans and I'm not, and that is fine. This article doesn't make me dislike him, its just kind of saddens me, and yes of course its from the DNC. I just strongly caution you in your zealousy to make excuses for it or think its ok. It won't get much play, probably, let us not speak of this article again.
But please, for the love of God and all that is good, rationalizing this will lose the moral superiority of the GOP we built with W and frying Clinton. Be more careful.
166
posted on
08/27/2003 4:58:34 PM PDT
by
PeoplesRep_of_LA
(Stop Dividing the Republican base; vote McClintock on October 7, 2003!)
To: gdani
I mean, what did he expect when he started running? Did I miss something? Is Schwarzenegger complaining?
I didn't think so.
To: 68 grunt
The poor bleeder (Churchillbluff) ain't even from California..........
Arnold is far from perfect but far better than Bustamante. McClintock is closer to my beliefs but unattainable this time around.
168
posted on
08/27/2003 4:59:42 PM PDT
by
dennisw
(G_d is at war with Amalek for all generations)
To: journey7873
After hearing Sean Hannity's interview with Arnold, and now reading this article, I am about to conclude that the characters Arnold plays in his movies are rooted in his own character. I like his unflinching directness. He seems to have decided that he will run as who and what he is--and let the chips fall where they may. He's definitely got my vote.
169
posted on
08/27/2003 4:59:46 PM PDT
by
giotto
To: ambrose
"He claims to have voted for 187 in '94, then states in 2002 that illegals should be entitled to free education. This goes to honesty and credibility."
Prop 187 merely attempted to prevent Cali from having to pay for the education of illegal aliens. That does not prevent the feds from paying for it, it's their problem after all.
170
posted on
08/27/2003 4:59:46 PM PDT
by
TheDon
(Why do liberals always side with the enemies of the US?)
To: journey7873
You couldn't be more welcome.
I admitted I can't prove it, but I can't remove my own observations from my mind either, even if I can't prove them now.
To: Enterprise
It's probably a good thing you hadn't already voted for Simon! LOL! Seriously, aren't you going to wait until closer to the election to see what else develops?
172
posted on
08/27/2003 4:59:58 PM PDT
by
alwaysconservative
(Which party represents the working people?)
To: churchillbuff
Blaming the messengers, are you?Yes, yes, a thousand times yes.
173
posted on
08/27/2003 5:00:26 PM PDT
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
To: journey7873
Arnold=diversity bump!
174
posted on
08/27/2003 5:00:34 PM PDT
by
wardaddy
("when shrimps learn to whistle")
To: churchillbuff
Funny how Freepers looked at old "hijinks" with less generosity when it was Clinton's background we were talking about. Except that Clinton's behavior continued and he smeared anyone who tried to expose it.
Of course, you do have a point, if folks already like Arnold, they are less likely to be swayed by something like this. I assume that you are not a fan of Arnold's candidacy and/or you have another person you'd rather see in office. You probably won't be swayed either.
I'm waiting for the dirt on Gary Coleman, so I can ignore it and defend him!
175
posted on
08/27/2003 5:00:39 PM PDT
by
TankerKC
(If I can take a Creative Writing class, why can't I take Creative Spelling class?)
To: 68 grunt
.... I still believe you are that person. I believe I saw this, as you did, and was going to comment similarly before I read your post.
Then you are a fool as well.
To: section9
Good observation. It explains why many politicians are silent on such issues.
177
posted on
08/27/2003 5:00:56 PM PDT
by
TheDon
(Why do liberals always side with the enemies of the US?)
To: Jim Robinson
Arnold just won the election.
To: journey7873
Equally brilliant answer.
179
posted on
08/27/2003 5:01:24 PM PDT
by
Redleg Duke
(Stir the pot...don't let anything settle to the bottom where the lawyers can feed off of it!)
To: All
1977
OUI: Do you use dope?
SCHWARZENEGGER: Yes, grass and hash-no hard drugs ...
1988
PLAYBOY: What about other drugs; have you done them?
SCHWARZENEGGER: Never in my entire life.
180
posted on
08/27/2003 5:01:27 PM PDT
by
ambrose
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 681-685 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson