Skip to comments.
Arnold backers: SHOULD GAYS BE ALLOWED TO ADOPT YOUNG BOYS? Arnold says yes -- do you agree?
AP via Lifesite.net ^
| Aug. 26, 03
| churchillbuff
Posted on 08/26/2003 2:23:28 PM PDT by churchillbuff
According to Lifesite, a Nov. 18, 2002 Associated Press article reported that Schwarzenegger describes himself as "very liberal" on social issues and that "He favors legalized abortion
and gay adoption". England's May 30 Guardian newspaper also quotes commentator Bill Bradley stating, "He's pro-choice, pro-gay rights
"
IS THIS REALLY AN ISSUE THAT FREEPERS CAN SWEEP UNDER THE RUG? SHOULDN'T WE DEBATE IT - UNLIKE ABOTION IT'S SOMETHING THAT STATE POLITICIANS CAN REALLY HAVE AN EFFECT OVER. SHOULD GAYS BE ALLOWED TO ADOPT YOUNG BOYS? IF YOU SAY NO, CAN YOU STILL SUPPORT ARNOLD?
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; US: California
KEYWORDS: bustamentebooster; desperatemcnaderite; family; homosexual; homosexualadoption; homosexualagenda; homosexuality; prisoners; recall; schwarzenegger; thispostisalie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301 next last
To: DoughtyOne
Yep, it's all the fault of McClintock and his supporters. None of the blame lies with Arnold's leftist social agenda.
To: I got the rope
I don't happen to be, no. But I'm not afraid of them as you appear to be. Why are you so scared?
42
posted on
08/26/2003 2:38:23 PM PDT
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
To: Tempest
Are you saying that Jim Robinson is a DU operative?
Well?
43
posted on
08/26/2003 2:38:32 PM PDT
by
B Knotts
To: ianincali
Yet another Arnie supporter who doesn't seem to understand that a vote for Tom is a vote for Tom. Geez. I'm starting to wonder about the intelligence of Arnie supporters.
44
posted on
08/26/2003 2:38:42 PM PDT
by
=Intervention=
(Those who cry the loudest that principle matters not are the most suspicious.)
To: =Intervention=
I encourage everyone who want's to, to vote for McCormick even at 5% if they like. I encourage everyone else to vote for Scharzenegger if they think he is most able to take Bustamante down on October 7th, and can't stand the idea of him winning.
To: churchillbuff
What does Bustamante think about it?
What?
Was it something I said?
46
posted on
08/26/2003 2:39:23 PM PDT
by
Redcloak
(Sheesh... Some people are so touchy...)
To: DoughtyOne
Agreed.
47
posted on
08/26/2003 2:39:36 PM PDT
by
LisaAnne
To: Grand Old Partisan
GOP once again uses his crystal ball to tell us who the next governor will be. Just to be safe, though, he hedges with the "or." Now I want to know about the races next Tuesday. Can you help me out with your powers of future prediction?
48
posted on
08/26/2003 2:39:53 PM PDT
by
=Intervention=
(Those who cry the loudest that principle matters not are the most suspicious.)
To: B Knotts
Are you saying Bush is a DU operative?
Quotes from another thread:
Bustamante as governor would not be good news for Bush. As a Democrat in the governors chair, he would inherit Daviss fiscal problems but not his personal baggage. Accordingly, the election of a Republican Oct. 7 suddenly becomes a Bush priority. Nobody gives 2002 nominee Bill Simon a prayer, and state Sen. Tom McClintock is a very dark horse. That is why, on the day after Schwarzenegger nudged aside Riordan to become a candidate, the President declared of the five-time Mr. Universe: I think hed make a good governor.
LINK
I think McClintock is the better candidate. If he can't win I will vote for someone else rather than see Davis or worse yet Bustamante hold the office.
To: 68 grunt
You missed my point. Without an agreement on what law is supposed to do, it doesn't get created. Law reflects a moral order. Your broadside that social conservatives don't matter is in effect saying that the considerations of what informs lawmaking are irrelevant.
50
posted on
08/26/2003 2:41:25 PM PDT
by
=Intervention=
(Those who cry the loudest that principle matters not are the most suspicious.)
To: DoughtyOne
Have you noticed that the most vocal opposition to Arnold are from people not even in CA?
51
posted on
08/26/2003 2:41:26 PM PDT
by
LisaAnne
To: Redcloak
What does Bustamante think about it?
I don't support Bustamante, so I don't have to answer for or defend his positions. In fact, it's because of his positions that I oppose Bustamante.
You on the other hand, apparently support Arnold. Therefore you ought to be able to defend his positions, since you want someone who holds those positions to serve as governor.
To: =Intervention=
Yes, the next Governor of California will not be Tom McClintock.
53
posted on
08/26/2003 2:41:50 PM PDT
by
Grand Old Partisan
(You can read about my history of the GOP at www.republicanbasics.com)
To: DoughtyOne
If you really believe that, then you need to cut out the "a vote for McC is a vote for Busta" posts and cartoons that you post to every California election thread.
54
posted on
08/26/2003 2:43:12 PM PDT
by
=Intervention=
(Those who cry the loudest that principle matters not are the most suspicious.)
To: churchillbuff
What you are doing is indistinguishable from what a Democrat operatitive would be doing on behalf of Cruz Bustamante.
55
posted on
08/26/2003 2:43:38 PM PDT
by
Grand Old Partisan
(You can read about my history of the GOP at www.republicanbasics.com)
Comment #56 Removed by Moderator
To: Tabi Katz
You know, it must be real hard for you folks to come to terms with the fact that I will vote for McClintock if he has a chance of winning. What's your explanation for that in the grand conspiracy theory?
To: LisaAnne
Have you noticed that this point inevitably appears from those who have no other recourse? As desperation, it works pretty well. As logical thought, it doesn't.
58
posted on
08/26/2003 2:44:36 PM PDT
by
=Intervention=
(Those who cry the loudest that principle matters not are the most suspicious.)
To: LisaAnne
Yes.
To: DoughtyOne
You've mixed up the talking points. It is the Schwarzenegger supporters who have all started accusing McClintock supporters of being Democrat operatives, who want to elect Large Breasts.
I was just pointing out how silly that accusation is.
60
posted on
08/26/2003 2:45:04 PM PDT
by
B Knotts
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson