Skip to comments.
Arnold backers: SHOULD GAYS BE ALLOWED TO ADOPT YOUNG BOYS? Arnold says yes -- do you agree?
AP via Lifesite.net ^
| Aug. 26, 03
| churchillbuff
Posted on 08/26/2003 2:23:28 PM PDT by churchillbuff
According to Lifesite, a Nov. 18, 2002 Associated Press article reported that Schwarzenegger describes himself as "very liberal" on social issues and that "He favors legalized abortion
and gay adoption". England's May 30 Guardian newspaper also quotes commentator Bill Bradley stating, "He's pro-choice, pro-gay rights
"
IS THIS REALLY AN ISSUE THAT FREEPERS CAN SWEEP UNDER THE RUG? SHOULDN'T WE DEBATE IT - UNLIKE ABOTION IT'S SOMETHING THAT STATE POLITICIANS CAN REALLY HAVE AN EFFECT OVER. SHOULD GAYS BE ALLOWED TO ADOPT YOUNG BOYS? IF YOU SAY NO, CAN YOU STILL SUPPORT ARNOLD?
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; US: California
KEYWORDS: bustamentebooster; desperatemcnaderite; family; homosexual; homosexualadoption; homosexualagenda; homosexuality; prisoners; recall; schwarzenegger; thispostisalie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240, 241-260, 261-280 ... 301 next last
To: thoughtomator
BUMP
241
posted on
08/26/2003 5:33:16 PM PDT
by
GrandMoM
("What is impossible with men is possible with GOD -Luke 18:27)
To: Tempest
The only way for McClintock to be an electable candidate... I agree...don't like it, but I agree.
To: 68 grunt
Time to evolve into what, exactly? Nihilists?
To: churchillbuff
..or adoption of girls by gay women?
244
posted on
08/26/2003 5:57:00 PM PDT
by
ladysusan
(Where's it going to end?)
To: thoughtomator
...The GOP is a loser in California unless it takes its head out of the sand ...This is hilarious! New Yorker critizing California. Take our head outta the sand, huh? Man, I can't stop laughing. Give my best regards to Hillary, dude, I'm sure she'll be happy with bustamante.
245
posted on
08/26/2003 6:00:49 PM PDT
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
To: 68 grunt
Yeah, if you hadn't noticed we have a GOP Governor and Mayor here in NYC. Maybe you ought to listen up some.
246
posted on
08/26/2003 6:16:14 PM PDT
by
thoughtomator
(Welcome to the Iraq Roach Motel - Islamofascists check in, but they don't check out!)
To: thoughtomator
Oh, I'm sorry, I'll put a straight face on and commend your model conservative mayor and gub. ;^)
ps - really !
247
posted on
08/26/2003 6:18:33 PM PDT
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
To: Always Right
Sorry if I offended you,I may have posted to the wrong person.These old eyes don"t see too good.Oh by the way I'm not a dude and I gave the stuff up years ago.Just joken
248
posted on
08/26/2003 6:22:43 PM PDT
by
deJaz
To: 68 grunt
Well the mayor is garbage, but there wasn't even a conservative option. But Pataki vs. Ahnold? Come on... Pataki is way more conservative. Even Guiliani is a hell of a lot more conservative than Arnold!
249
posted on
08/26/2003 6:22:45 PM PDT
by
thoughtomator
(Welcome to the Iraq Roach Motel - Islamofascists check in, but they don't check out!)
To: thoughtomator
You are completely civil and we both suffer our own predicaments. It is ridiculus to continue interfriggin'nestine behavior!
250
posted on
08/26/2003 6:29:26 PM PDT
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
To: 68 grunt
Absolutely. So let's keep backing the most reasonably conservative candidate and push for government to do what we think is right. Make the Left come to us, the other way around has only gotten us screwed.
251
posted on
08/26/2003 6:30:48 PM PDT
by
thoughtomator
(Welcome to the Iraq Roach Motel - Islamofascists check in, but they don't check out!)
To: thoughtomator
Ahhh, okay.
252
posted on
08/26/2003 6:31:42 PM PDT
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
To: RGSpincich
Care to provide a direct quote from the candidate that supports your inflammatory headline?
All the news articles on the subject say that Arnold is pro-gay-rights. Please provide a quote where he says this is not true.
To: Those_Crazy_Liberals
McClintock, by staying in the race is doing more to promote the homosexual agenda than could Barney Frank.
How so? Arnold has bought into the homosexual agenda. Isn't he the one -- along with Busta and Davis -- who is promoting it?
To: CdMGuy
Hey Churchillbuff, what state do you live in? If it isn't CA, then we Californians don't give a rat's ass what your opinion is on our election.
I care about the future of the GOP. I don't want it to turn into another vehicle for homosexual agenda and abortion activism. Sorry, but I've got some strong convictions and political expediency isn't enough to make me shed them.
To: churchillbuff
Either we are Right or we are wrong.
Bush II, Bush I, Reagan and Nixon are all social conservaitves. Who says Social Conservatives can't win?
256
posted on
08/26/2003 7:34:36 PM PDT
by
CyberCowboy777
(SELECT * FROM (D) WHERE clue > 0 ................................................. 0 rows returned)
To: churchillbuff
"How so? Arnold has bought into the homosexual agenda. Isn't he the one -- along with Busta and Davis -- who is promoting it?"
McClintock will ensure the most pro-homosexual candidate wins.
257
posted on
08/26/2003 7:35:52 PM PDT
by
Those_Crazy_Liberals
(Ronaldus Magnus he's our man . . . If he can't do it, no one can.)
To: Those_Crazy_Liberals
McClintock will ensure the most pro-homosexual candidate wins.
Explain how any one of these three -- Davis, Busta or Arnold -- is more pro-homosexual than another. Please give specifics.
To: churchillbuff
No, I do not agree with that one bit. I also do not want Cruz to be governor either, in fact, he would be so much worse it isn't funny. What would all of you have us do? Vote for a rat who wants the state returned to Mexico. He is a member of a radical racist group you know ,and the media is silent on that! I am going to vote for which ever republican has the most chance of winning when election day is here. The assembly of California would pass such gay favoring bills no matter who is the governor!
259
posted on
08/26/2003 7:40:44 PM PDT
by
ladyinred
(The left have blood on their hands.)
To: 68 grunt
Bush II, Bush I, Reagan and Nixon are all social conservatives.
Conservatives are not anti change - they are anti idiot.
Gay paternity is stupid and history has proven its fallacy. Anyone 'for' it is an idiot and should not be running a state.
260
posted on
08/26/2003 7:43:04 PM PDT
by
CyberCowboy777
(SELECT * FROM (D) WHERE clue > 0 ................................................. 0 rows returned)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240, 241-260, 261-280 ... 301 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson