Arnold backers: SHOULD GAYS BE ALLOWED TO ADOPT YOUNG BOYS? Arnold says yes -- do you agree?

AP via Lifesite.net ^ | Aug. 26, 03 | churchillbuff

[churchillbuff]

According to Lifesite, a Nov. 18, 2002 Associated Press article reported that Schwarzenegger describes himself as "very liberal" on social issues and that "He favors legalized abortion…and gay adoption". England's May 30 Guardian newspaper also quotes commentator Bill Bradley stating, "He's pro-choice, pro-gay rights… "

IS THIS REALLY AN ISSUE THAT FREEPERS CAN SWEEP UNDER THE RUG? SHOULDN'T WE DEBATE IT - UNLIKE ABOTION IT'S SOMETHING THAT STATE POLITICIANS CAN REALLY HAVE AN EFFECT OVER. SHOULD GAYS BE ALLOWED TO ADOPT YOUNG BOYS? IF YOU SAY NO, CAN YOU STILL SUPPORT ARNOLD?

[Vindiciae Contra TyrannoSCOTUS]

you people(( calif )) are acting like a bunch of Frenchman. No backbone.

WorldNetDaily: Research: 1/3 of us worship celebrities

[RedBloodedAmerican]

No candidate going to agree someone 100% and no one is going to agree with a candidate 100%. If they did, then one of them is lying.

'Fornians better get the best man who has a chance of getting in Office and deal with it.

[Wolfspring]

We all need to evolve into a real freedom lovers!
We should be the party of personal responsibility.
More personal responsibility and less government
interference in our daily lives would be great.

I admit, I do not favor homosexual adoption, but I
am very liberal on most social issues. That would
include the legalization of most drugs.

[nosofar]

In post #45 he said 'McCormick".

What would really be embarrassing is misspelling Schwarzenegger.

[Tabi Katz]

"You know, it must be real hard for you folks to come to terms with the fact that I will vote for McClintock if he has a chance of winning."

Seems he'd have a better chance of winning if everyone who preferred him actually voted for him.

[GrandMoM]

...please see post #223! Thanks

[nosofar]

I believe we should be very careful what we say and how we say it, I am not to sure who I will vote for now but I will vote.

The absolute stupidest and most asinine thing anyone could do is NOT vote, regardless of who the vote goes for.

[Always Right]

How can you condemn all gays and say they are all pedophiles.You don't like gays which is your right but who are you to say that they are pedophiles.

Where the heck did I say that, and did you agree with the asine comment I was responding to. Quite smoking dope dude.

[churchillbuff]

Hey Churchillbuff, what state do you live in? If it isn't CA,

AS A REPUBLICAN, I SHOULDN'T HAVE TO LIVE IN CALIFORNIA TO BE CONCERNED ABOUT THE DIRECTION OF MY PARTY.

[Tempest]

The only way for McClintock to be an electable candidate in 2006 is to withdraw from the race now and work with Schwarzenneger, so that he's not viewed as a fly in the ointment for this race.

McClintock is a career politician unlike Arnold, if he's viewed as an obstruction to advancing Republicans and an enabler of installing Cruz Bustamante and splinterinr Republican efforts at holding a succesful recall. His career is OVER.

[68 grunt]

... go ahead a vote for him, be ready to pay the price!

Thank you very much for your blessed approval.

[Concentrate]

The Liberals hate Schwarzenneger. That alone should be justification enough to vote for him.

[nosofar]

no one should support kalifornicate remaining in the union

Actually, we just need to get rid of San Francisco and Los Angeles. If we're lucky, they'll both fall in the ocean.

[Concentrate]

What's more, he has to say all kinds of things just to get elected. Doesn't mean that he means them. That's my best hope, anyway. It's a sorry situation, no matter how you look at it.

[thoughtomator]

Gay Illegal Aliens on Social Services for Ahnold!

[68 grunt]

I am truly enjoying your discomfort. You're really coming unglued! Remember, that what happens in California comes your way, sooner or later.

[nosofar]

Then you yourself are a Republican-In-Name-Only. True Republicans want their party to win elections.

You've convinced me. The only important thing is to win elections, so I've decided to be completely pragmatic about this and become a Democrat.

[thoughtomator]

Makes one wonder: Why does a GOP compromise candidate always have to be the one that looks most like a Democrat?

Arnold doesn't even pretend to have a clue as to what he would do if he won. A completely substanceless candidate whose advisors publicly contradict him and each other, and somehow a principled and knowledgable candidate is supposed to step aside to clear the stage for him?

Why doesn't the guy who has no idea what he is doing step aside?

Why are the left-leaning members of the GOP so quick to toss conservatives overboard, and to burn at the stake anyone who sticks to their guns on principle? To me, that does more to solidify Bustamante than anything - it gives him the appearance of moral credibility when a GOP candidate runs on a liberal platform.

This is the same game that gave a minority of Democrats the run of Congress. Leftist GOP candidates are always worried that some liberal won't like them and will say bad things about them, so they pander to Democrats in the hope that someone else (preferably a conservative) will take the heat.

The GOP is a loser in California unless it takes its head out of the sand. Ronald Reagan was in the movies, but he was also a thinker with a plan, not just a pretty face. Arnold has no plan. If he had one, he would have announced it before he ran. This is a whim, and he is not a serious candidate which can pull the GOP forward.

[thoughtomator]

You've convinced me. The only important thing is to win elections, so I've decided to be completely pragmatic about this and become a Democrat.

I nominate this for Quote of the Day! LMAO