Arnold to Debate McClintock (Of course not; just Humor)

Parodies R Us ^ | August 26 | evil conservatives

[PeoplesRep_of_LA]

You continue to ignore or look the other way to the fact

Yeah Registered, there does seem to be alot of "ignoring" going on around here, but its from the "electable" crowd more than ANYONE ELSE.

Still waiting for answers to my questions 1-4. I can post them for you if you need me to.

[Registered]

Let's put those Field Poll numbers up for all to see:

Cruz: 25%
Arnold: 22
McClintock: 9 (that's right, 9 folks)
Simon: 8
Ueberroth: 5
Huffington: 1 (the insane vote for sure)
Camejo: 2
Flynt: 1 (Clinton Relatives)
Others: 5
None: 5
UNDECIDED: 14%!

[PeoplesRep_of_LA]

I'm betting Schwarzenegger will soon put out positions against partial-birth abortion and pro-parental-notification-for-minors

keep betting, but stop telling us how place our bets.

[PeoplesRep_of_LA]

Not the 1. 2. 3. 4. questions Registered and you know it!

This is gonna be soooooo funny when you actually have to answer a direct question...Kinda like when your (R)nold has to in the debates....mu ha hahaaaaaa

[PeoplesRep_of_LA]

I'll try again since it was so hard to follow in what I did, I admit it was a long post. Let me clarify;

1. What are (R)nolds total %? [that's easy, everybody knows its 22%]

2. What are (R)nolds % of Demos he is getting votes from? What are his Unfavorables with Demos?

3. A bigger part to any early poll is the Unfavorable rather than the "for", which is why Simon dropped out, any idea what (R)nolds overall unfavorables are?

4. Most of all, since 22% won't get it done, what are the % of people still undecided?

[Registered]

McClintock: 9%

A little quote from the Field Poll: Simon and McClintock do poorly among Democrats, non-partisans, middle of the road voters and liberals

It is important to realize this is just like a GENERAL election. The GOP candidate must attract votes from the n-p's, the middle of the roads and some liberals. Or the GOP will lose. Reality sucks.

[pogo101]

I'm betting Schwarzenegger will soon put out positions against partial-birth abortion and pro-parental-notification-for-minors

keep betting, but stop telling us how place our bets.

No one's telling you anything, prunella. Setting that aside, if you don't like my post, you can pucker up. :)

[Registered]

Riiiight, let's rely on an internet "straw poll" as the basis to make a decision here. I can see I am arguing with someone that has a strong agenda...for the GOP to lose.

[Registered]

I'd like them to do an IP check on the McClintock votes. I bet most came from 66.134.87.76

[PeoplesRep_of_LA]

We officially have a listening problem with yet another (R)nold head.

[Bob]

Thanks. I didn't know who had originated the list.

[Registered]

No, we someone trying to push an agenda to convince people that they can actually move McClintock from 9% to a winning percentage. Ain't gonna happen.

[pogo101]

keep betting, but stop telling us how place our bets.

I'm still laughing at this one. It deserves another post of ridicule: IS THIS THE BEST YOU COULD COME BACK WITH, prunella? I posted several hundred words partly praising, partly criticizing, a detailed policy-comparison chart ... Nowhere do I suggest that anyone "place their bets" in any particular way ... But you are such a little stalker, so intent on finding something cutesy to say in criticism, prunella, that you post the above.

Wow. I'm in awe.

[Hillary's Lovely Legs]

Why would Arnold debate McClintock? He's running against Bustamonte.

This is not the primary, this is the whole enchilada.

[Registered]

That has been my point the entire thread.

[Hillary's Lovely Legs]

That's my point as well. McClintock is running against his own party. That's bad politics. After badmouthing all of Arnold's economic policies, which are the opposite of the Democrats, how does he expect any credability against Bustamonte?