Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Vanity) California Recall - A Fair And Balanced Look at FR
Me | me

Posted on 08/23/2003 11:27:34 AM PDT by freedumb2003

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last
This is it folks. Thousands of posts and I haven't seen anything not covered here. But of course, you may think otherwise....
1 posted on 08/23/2003 11:27:35 AM PDT by freedumb2003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
Your post is probably the most sensible I've seen. Unless the 'pubbies unite behind one serious candidate, we're gonna see Senor Cruz as el jeffe.

I suppose I could be convinced that McClintock could be the frontrunner, if there was enough consistent neutral polling to that effect. However, as a longtime student of California politics and demographics, I just don't see McClintock winning. The winner in major California elections is determined by what one commentator called "the capricious million" some 35 years ago: the 'moderate' voters who are turned off by appeals they see as ideological and who want to vote for someone they can feel good about. As I read this race, Arnold is the only 'pubbie who won't give those middle voters agina, and therefore, I think he's gonna be the guy. If McClintock really wants influence, he should get together with, and behind, Arnold now, while he has something to bargain with, and make a deal for conservative influence.

2 posted on 08/23/2003 11:37:15 AM PDT by CatoRenasci (Ceterum Censeo [Gallia][Germania][Arabia] Esse Delendam --- Select One or More as needed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CatoRenasci
Arnold is the only 'pubbie who won't give those middle voters agina

Alas, that's pretty much were things stand. Let's all pray that The Terminator and The Tominator get together.

Thanks

3 posted on 08/23/2003 12:04:25 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Peace through Strength)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CatoRenasci
As I read this race, Arnold is the only 'pubbie who won't give those middle voters agina, and therefore, I think he's gonna be the guy.


And he won;t give anyone his agenda... other than what we can see and hear thru his cutesy soundbites and Prop 49 support and offering of bringing back businesses to support socialist programs.

Yup..Arnie IS the man ... NOT.

4 posted on 08/23/2003 12:05:23 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ...&&&&&&&&&...SuPPort FRee Republic.....www.TomMcClintock.com..... NEVER FORGET)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
PING!

Your One Stop Resource For All The California Recall News!

Want on our daily or major news ping lists? Freepmail DoctorZin.

5 posted on 08/23/2003 12:07:21 PM PDT by DoctorZIn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
Overall a good analysis. With such a sharp mind, it is disappointing you resort to a stupid statement like this one:

"Remember, in California a Conservative is anyone to the right of Karl Marx."
6 posted on 08/23/2003 12:11:19 PM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
"Davis must go and Bustamante must not replace him - These are axiomatic and are the meeting point for all FReepers (and all right-thinking people). "

NOT SO! In the long run (through 11/04) we are much better off with Davis in place as governor. California, as a terrible example of ultra-left wing dem rule is an advantage in the 2004 national election. If Davis is replaced by an honest person, we don't have that contrast.

But, that is now out of our hands. Your analysis is sound. McClintock is doctrinally better, Arnold more likely to win. We will never convince the purists amongst us to support Arnold and so it is likely to Cruz will win. Not the worst thing that could happen so long as the brave Republicans in the legilature hold their ground.

And, we will have our chance should Nader be coaxed from protecting his considerable wealth to run and/or Sharpton, McKinney, Moseley-Braun, etc. have the bravery and guts to buck the dems' racial hatred and run a ticket.

7 posted on 08/23/2003 12:12:32 PM PDT by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truth_seeker
. With such a sharp mind, it is disappointing you resort to a stupid statement like this one:

Remember, in California a Conservative is anyone to the right of Karl Marx."

Guilty as charged. can't get Hyerbole past FR ("I happen to know this is the Lupin Express!")

But seriously, a middle-lefter in California is a right-winder in the California Political Calculus. My point is that we need someone who can just keep the ship leaning less left.

8 posted on 08/23/2003 12:14:05 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Peace through Strength)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tacis
we are much better off with Davis in place as governor

Perhaps I should have added this. You are right in one of two senses:

  1. If California sinks into the Pacific and the dems are the Captain, they get the blame forever.
    Response: I am ON that ship and don't want to drown for political gain. Also, if we can send Davis packing, California could again be an important state in the political world (at this point it is conceded as being Dem/Liberal and of no particular importance).
  2. Bustmante is worse than Davis
    Response: Yep, but we stil h ave to let the Left know they can't just run renegade like a bunch of French or Canadians spending money they don't have on social programs that are essentially vote-buying grabs. This one is painful for all right-thinking conservatives, but is a cost I think most would and will pay.

9 posted on 08/23/2003 12:21:12 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Peace through Strength)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
When you say that you can't accept failure to defeat the Democrat, you abandon all leverage--that decision is the decision to move to the left to accept the lesser evil.

Not trying to get McClintock is the planted axiom within "Bustamonte can't be allowed to win."

I was just mentioning today that "We can't afford to have a deficit" was Republican dogma before Kemp-Roth, and the planted axiom within that was, "Democrats will always get the credit with the public for 'social spending' and Republicans will always get the blame for high taxes to pay for it." That is, the planted axiom within the "taxes must be raised to cover spending" decision is "Republicans never are in the majority."

10 posted on 08/23/2003 12:31:24 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The everyday blessings of God are great--they just don't make "good copy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
California Recall - A Fair And Balanced Look at FR

Watch out, O'Reilly may demand that Fox News Channel sue you...

11 posted on 08/23/2003 12:58:55 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion
When you say that you can't accept failure to defeat the Democrat, you abandon all leverage--that decision is the decision to move to the left to accept the lesser evil.

Yes, that is my anabshed position. And I think it is the position of all right thinking californians. But there is still the "let the ship sink with the Left at the Helm" argument. But I stand behind my analysis and conculsions.

12 posted on 08/23/2003 1:17:09 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Peace through Strength)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
Watch out, O'Reilly may demand that Fox News Channel sue you

Thanks for getting the joke. Note that I waited until after that smarmy Franken jerk (who might have been funny 20 years ago) paved the way for me to use the term. But "I'll buy that For a Dollar" is mine until the Groove Tube folks sign on.

13 posted on 08/23/2003 1:19:35 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Peace through Strength)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
I like you analyze...

I would add my own fear is Arnold is not a fiscal conservative ....anymore

Peoples politics change .....Reagan was a Liberal Dem at one time..... Goldwater near the end of his life started going left (people forget he did work with Norman Lears’ group “People for the American Way”)

Also note that both Reagan & Goldwater were pulled the other direction by there wives

Alot of people though McCain was the second coming of Reagan at one time ...... Ted Turner was consider a conservative once.... and CNN was also to when it first started ......

Jim Rob is an ex Dem... so are a lot of freppers ....... and in most case it takes a while for that person to realized and make the change

At the very least watch Arnold’s moves ... and his backtracks... don’t assume

14 posted on 08/23/2003 1:40:11 PM PDT by tophat9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tophat9000
I would add my own fear is Arnold is not a fiscal conservative ....anymore

Peoples politics change

True and a valid concern. But absent any actual facts that suggest Arnold would turn the worm and present the MECHA leanings of Cruz B. I would submit this is not a criterion that should be used to evaluate this election.

I noted above my wild-card analysis, but at the end of the day I wouldn't let too much speculation guide your vote (assuming you are a current Californian).

15 posted on 08/23/2003 1:51:36 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Peace through Strength)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
Should it get within 2 weeks of the election and we have both Arnold and McClintock and McClintock trails significantly, we MUST throw our support for Arnold. Even a RINO will be better than Bustamante, who is worse than Davis.

I agree .. but .. I think Tom is a better candidate! However, I will say this again for whatever it's worth. Tom would be a prime candidate to unseat BOXER! By the time the recall is over - HE WILL BE KNOWN STATEWIDE!! Sounds like a plan to me.
16 posted on 08/23/2003 3:19:45 PM PDT by CyberAnt ( America - "The Greatest Nation on the Face of the Earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
Nice summary. Would you mind doing one for the creationist / evolutionist threads?

Thanks,
I.T.
17 posted on 08/23/2003 3:23:04 PM PDT by Interesting Times (Tag line. You're it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom2003
Sorry, I forgot to put quotes around the first paragraph.
18 posted on 08/23/2003 3:25:18 PM PDT by CyberAnt ( America - "The Greatest Nation on the Face of the Earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: freedom2003; freedumb2003
Sorry - msg was for freedumb2003
19 posted on 08/23/2003 3:26:49 PM PDT by CyberAnt ( America - "The Greatest Nation on the Face of the Earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
I agree with most of your analysis, except the hysterial Aztlan bunk.

You are too smart to wave the anti-Hispanic flag.

I know as many hard-right Hispanics as I do hard-left Socialists.

Stay away from tripping the Latino alarm.

20 posted on 08/23/2003 3:31:13 PM PDT by Precisian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson