NOT SO! In the long run (through 11/04) we are much better off with Davis in place as governor. California, as a terrible example of ultra-left wing dem rule is an advantage in the 2004 national election. If Davis is replaced by an honest person, we don't have that contrast.
But, that is now out of our hands. Your analysis is sound. McClintock is doctrinally better, Arnold more likely to win. We will never convince the purists amongst us to support Arnold and so it is likely to Cruz will win. Not the worst thing that could happen so long as the brave Republicans in the legilature hold their ground.
And, we will have our chance should Nader be coaxed from protecting his considerable wealth to run and/or Sharpton, McKinney, Moseley-Braun, etc. have the bravery and guts to buck the dems' racial hatred and run a ticket.
Perhaps I should have added this. You are right in one of two senses: