Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
To: new cruelty
It was Johnson ... Ladybird Johnson.
2 posted on
08/20/2003 6:22:36 PM PDT by
evolved_rage
(Davis is a POS!)
To: new cruelty
Does this mean we get to see more JFK specials on C-Span and PBS?
To: new cruelty
I've always thought Johnson set him up.
4 posted on
08/20/2003 6:26:56 PM PDT by
aimhigh
To: new cruelty
I have believed it was LBJ since the 1970s.
I saw a documentary which quoted LBJ's mistress (at the time) who stated that he told her--two weeks before the assassination--"Those Kennedies will never s**t on me again," or words to that effect.
--Boris
6 posted on
08/20/2003 6:29:06 PM PDT by
boris
(Education is always painful; pain is always educational.)
To: new cruelty
I've been out. Did Dan Rather breathlessly devote his program to charts and graphs proving Gerald Posner (Case Closed) is right? With the 40th anniv. coming, we can expect more books, and Dan's breathless special.
7 posted on
08/20/2003 6:30:15 PM PDT by
ntnychik
To: new cruelty
Well .. of COURSE Johnson was behind this whole thing ... BUT that was never exposed in Oliver Stone's movie
JFK so I don't believe it ...
</sarcasm>
9 posted on
08/20/2003 6:33:02 PM PDT by
_Jim
(First INDICT the ham sandwhich ... the next step is to CONVICT it ...)
To: new cruelty
It wouldn't surprise me if lbj was involved. I remember theories floating at the time that sounded plausible to me.
10 posted on
08/20/2003 6:34:47 PM PDT by
mombonn
(¡Viva Bush/Cheney!)
To: new cruelty
Let us try to list all of those that might have been involved in the hit ... FBI, CIA, Castro, Russians, Corsican mob, Mossad, Chicago mob, New Orleans mob, Teamsters, LBJ, Nixon, Bush (PHEW!)
Let's do this the easy way. Let's figure out who was NOT involved ... every Irish Catholic woman in America.
Get the point!
To: new cruelty
I believe it.
Johnson was a ruthless and power mad politician with a psycho ego. He routinely crushed and ruined his opponents in business, politics and law.
He should be dug up and hung.
13 posted on
08/20/2003 6:38:00 PM PDT by
Fledermaus
(Democrats have stunted brain development!)
To: new cruelty
This is preposterous. LBJ was ruthless enough to do whatever he thought best, but he wasn't stupid enough to point at himself by doing it in Texas. He would have had it done if he was gonna do it on the East or West Coast.
This twits sons are either going to have to explicitly disavow their father or resign from office, cause there is gonna be a shitstorm over this.
So9
To: new cruelty
Interesting, I will read the book just like I have read all of the others and see what he has to say. I have heard rumors about LBJ over the years, and know that he was a pretty dirty politican, and that is about all I know about him.
16 posted on
08/20/2003 6:40:13 PM PDT by
ladyinred
(The left have blood on their hands.)
To: new cruelty
This is why no DemocRAT would ever have Hillary as VP on his ticket.
18 posted on
08/20/2003 6:41:58 PM PDT by
doug from upland
(Why did DemocRATS allow a perjuring rapist to remain in the Oval Office?)
To: new cruelty
I'm old enough to remember JFK's assassination in Dallas ... it was a watershed event for "baby boomers" not unlike Pearl Harbor for our parents. LBJ was not involved in any way shape or form in Kennedy's assassination ... this is pure bunk!
20 posted on
08/20/2003 6:42:29 PM PDT by
BluH2o
To: new cruelty
Yep it was Kennedy's Johnson that did him in
22 posted on
08/20/2003 6:44:46 PM PDT by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
To: new cruelty
Years ago I heard Johnson backed the Canadian Prime Minister against the wall for his opposition to US involvement in Vietnam. If that story was true, it shows LBJ could get violent, and he did hate the Kennedy's, but I'm still not totally convinced of this. I think it was Castro or the Russians.
To: new cruelty
I have a bizarre and outlandish hypothesis: Oswald pulled the trigger and acted alone.
To: new cruelty
I have believed this to be the case since Walter announced Kennedy had died!
30 posted on
08/20/2003 6:47:36 PM PDT by
lawdude
(Liberalism: A failure every time it is tried!)
To: new cruelty
Almost every JFK conspiracy theory is built upon one single critical foundation: Lee Harvey Oswald didn't shoot President Kennedy.
Some people just won't believe that a US Marine qualified as a Marksman could possibly make two hits in several seconds on a human target from less than 100 paces. The Mannlicher-Carcano is actually a decent shooting rifle, and Oswald was basically a competent rifleman.
I've never seen convincing evidence that leads me to believe that Oswald was incapable of making those shots. It's the only thing about the Kennedy Assassination that I'm sure about.
To: new cruelty
There was another book written years ago with this same premise.
Remember the photo of LBJ being sworn in on the plane with Jackie Kennedy next to him? Well, the author included another photo taken seconds after that one...shows LBJ turning to a man behind him and both were beaming with looks of triumph! Jackie still in shock beside him.
I wish I could remember the title.
38 posted on
08/20/2003 6:51:33 PM PDT by
FReepaholic
(My other tag line is hilarious.)
To: new cruelty
I recall an interview with a Mafia boss many years ago when he mentioned that whenever there is a murder you first look to who gained from it.
That would indicate Johnson, and I think he was capable of anything. Still I don't really think he did it. I think it was Oswald with maybe an accomplice. I always wondered if they had Oswald set up as a patsy and were probably surprised that he in fact did make a hit, alhtough probably someone else also did so.
40 posted on
08/20/2003 6:53:09 PM PDT by
yarddog
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson