Skip to comments.
Schwarzenegger Presents Vision for California
FoxNews ^
| Aug. 20, 2003
| FoxNews & AP
Posted on 08/20/2003 5:17:25 PM PDT by FairOpinion
Edited on 04/22/2004 12:37:00 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
SACRAMENTO, Calif.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: buffett; bustamante; california; davis; economy; mcclintock; plan; prop54; recall; schwarzenegger; simon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 last
To: Exit148
She reminds me of that He-Man cartoon character Skeletor. Somebody needs to give her a donut.
To: cyncooper
I see...
Thanks for informing me.
Still, the idea of invading Oregon seems to have found a following...
102
posted on
08/21/2003 2:06:28 PM PDT
by
Ronin
(Qui tacet consentit!)
To: cyncooper; Maccabee-AJB
>>>Uh...did you read the whole article? Sure enough, bucko!
I'm not bashing the liberal RINO, Arnold Schwarzenegger, I'm merely criticizing his rhetoric and lack of substance. Besides, he may have convinced the two of you, that he has solid conservative credentials and that's fine. But he hasn't convinced me. Yet.
If your so gulible and naive, as to believe one or two days worth of unspecific political rhetoric from Arnold and his handlers, so be it. I'm not ready to crown him King of California.
To: FairOpinion
But, Schwarzenegger, who is seeking to replace Democratic Gov. Gray Davis (search) in an Oct. 7 recall election, said that he would not raise taxes or cut spending to do it. Then how?
He said he wants a constitutional spending cap and pledged that as soon as he is in office, he will appoint Hoover Institution scholar John Kogan to lead the working group that would be charged with "restructuring the inherited debt."
I like the spending cap.
But I still have to back McClintock. He's the best man running in the two major parties.
104
posted on
08/21/2003 5:33:57 PM PDT
by
Dan from Michigan
("Boom Boom! Out go the lights!" - Pat Travers)
To: Reagan Man
If your so gulible and naive, as to believe one or two days worth of unspecific political rhetoric from Arnold and his handlers, so be it. I'm not ready to crown him King of California.First, I am not gullible or naive, and I judge candidates by more than a few days worth of statements. I look at an entire context.
Second, nobody is seeking to crown him king of California, just some hope he becomes the next governor there.
It's that type of over the top rhetoric and the eagerness some latch onto the least bit of information to support their negative views of the man that don't garner much respect or widen the base for your candidate.
To: Dan from Michigan
Keep reading.....This report (from Fox no less) is WRONG. Schwarzenegger said cuts are necessary.
You'll see.
To: cyncooper
>>>I look at an entire context.Come on. The entire context of Arnold's poltiical campaign amounts to roughly 2-3 days of rhetoric, at the most.
>>>It's that type of over the top rhetoric and the eagerness some latch onto the least bit of information to support their negative views of the man that don't garner much respect or widen the base for your candidate.
You ARE naive and you ARE gulible and this statement proves it beyond a shadow of a doubt.
Arnold has been involved in the political arena for a total of may be ten whole days and already he's the ultimate fiscal conservative and has all the answers. Give me a break! LMAO
To: Reagan Man
You are completely and utterly incorrect and have no business making pronouncements about anybody, whether they be candidates or posters on FR, since you display such a deficit of knowledge.
Laugh all you want. Ignorance is bliss, they say.
(Plus you assign statements to people that they never said. Tsk, tsk)
To: cyncooper
I'll match my political knowledge and experience with yours, any day of the week. You can't even comprehend the basic argument, that Arnold Schwarzenegger is a political novice and social liberal, who supports abortion on demand, special rights for homosexuals and gun control. His rhetoric on fiscal conservatism falls short, especially when one compares it with his recent remarks, about wanting to get California's social welfare programs properly funded, for the people. I call that
high minded liberalism.Let's not forget, Arnold was about to leave the GOP because he disagreed with the impeachment proceedings against der schlickmeister. In my book, that means Arnold condoned Clinton's outrageous behavior. Remember, BillBoy perjured himself and lied to a grand jury.
Read Arnold's political opinions and then read the GOP party platform. You'll be amazed to find out to what degree Arnold is not a Republican. On most social issues Arnold is closer to his relative, FatTeddyK, then he is to Ronald Reagan or PresBush43. On economic issues Arnold hasn't proven he's a fiscal conservative, so far. And frankly, I doubt he ever will.
Anyone who comes on this ultimate conservative website and says they support a liberal RINO like Arnold, needs their head examined.
To: Reagan Man
LOL
Comment #111 Removed by Moderator
To: FairOpinion
This just in: In an effort to prove that Arnold is indeed a conservative, Rush Limbaugh has announced that Arnold has been given a teaching fellowship at the Institute For Advanced Conservative Studies. Developing......
112
posted on
08/21/2003 6:17:20 PM PDT
by
fightu4it
(conquest by immigration and subversion spells the end of US.)
To: Reagan Man
Whatever. You have demonstrated zero insight and you present faulty data to support your contentions. Then you lob insults.
All in all, not impressive.
To: FairOpinion
Yep, he's certainly said, "Read my lips" on new taxes.
114
posted on
08/21/2003 6:20:07 PM PDT
by
JoeSchem
(Has a moderate Republican ever moved to the RIGHT after getting elected?)
To: cyncooper
>>>Whatever. You have demonstrated zero insight and you present faulty data to support your contentions. This has nothing to do with insight. This has to do with you attempting to change the subject matter, from Arnold to Reagan Man, because you've lost the political argument on the substantive nature of Arnold's candidacy and the fact he's nothing but a liberal RINO.
And don't whine to me about lobbing insults either. When someone responds with an "LOL", that's a sure sign their ability to carry on any intelligent debate, is highly questionable. And you've proven you're a thin-skinned rhetorical big mouth and nothing more.
To: Maccabee-AJB
116
posted on
08/21/2003 7:17:07 PM PDT
by
FITZ
To: cyncooper
You are way behind...I acknowledged later in a post that I was erroenous and retracted my crticisms based on that error.
Thanks.
117
posted on
08/21/2003 8:24:41 PM PDT
by
Fledermaus
(Democrats have stunted brain development!)
To: Fledermaus
Sorry--you're right---I was way behind and responded before reading all replies.
To: Reagan Man
I didn't say I totally believed it, I was simply correcting the misstatement.
To: FairOpinion
He may be serious, but in reality, he is not going to be able to save California.
120
posted on
08/29/2003 11:29:05 PM PDT
by
philetus
(Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson