Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

COUNTDOWN (443 DAYS) TO VICTORY '04--UPDATE from BUSH- Cheney '04 & NEWS from Dem Candidates/RECALL
Bush-Cheney '04/various ^ | August 15, 2003 | PhiKapMom/Various

Posted on 08/15/2003 8:49:46 AM PDT by PhiKapMom

COUNTDOWN (443 DAYS) TO VICTORY '04 --
UPDATE from BUSH- Cheney '04 and NEWS from the DEMOCRAT CANDIDATES on RECALL

The President and Congress are on the summer recess for the month of August so we decided to take some time off with these Countdown Threads as we prepare for the upcoming Presidential election. Today we are back with an Update from Bush-Cheney '04 along with information on the what the Democrat candidates are doing!

*************************

TODAY'S ACTION ITEM!

Please sign up today to get your own personal email of Bush-Cheney '04 updates. While at Bush-Cheney '04, sign up to Volunteer for the upcoming campaign! You can also donate at the site to insure that the Bush-Cheney message gets out since the Democrat liberal media is intent on insuring that the Democrat message is the only message heard by Americans.

Click below to visit Bush-Cheney '04!

* * * * * * * * * *

UPDATE FROM BUSH-CHENEY '04!


August 15, 2003


Upon being elected to office President Bush took immediate action to create jobs and grow an economy that was in recession. He has not stopped working to grow our economy since. This week, he met with his economic advisors to review the positive impact of his efforts.
  • Tax relief that puts more money into the pockets of working families: The President's tax relief of 2001 made the recession that began in March of 2000 one of the shallowest in history. In May of 2003, President Bush signed substantial tax relief that provides 91 million Americans an average of $1,126 in tax relief per year. Working parents are already receiving checks of $400 to help provide for their children's future;
  • Recovering from terrorist attacks: When our homeland and economy were shaken by the attacks of September 11, President Bush acted quickly to secure our homeland and get our economy moving again. He won passage of terrorism insurance legislation so the hard hats could get back to work in the wake of the terror attacks;
  • Promoting free trade: The President signed trade promotion authority to expand opportunities around the world for American products and promote freedom around the world.

Our economy is just starting to see the positive effects of the President’s Jobs and Growth Act of 2003 but President Bush continues to press for legislation to help America’s workers. He has called on Congress to pass his proposals for re-employment accounts to help those looking for work, to end lawsuit abuse that hurts consumers, and help small businesses pay for health care for their employees.



President Bush Announces Capture of Key al Qaeda Leader,
Thanks Servicemen and their Families at Miramar


Today, President Bush announced the capture of "one of the world's most lethal terrorists," Riduan Isamuddin - al Qaeda's chief leader in southeast Asia and the person responsible for numerous terrorist acts.



The remarkable progress America is making in the war on terror is possible because of the service of our men and women in uniform. President Bush visited some of the Marine Corp's finest to thank them for their service in protecting our homeland and promoting freedom at home and abroad.



Under the President's leadership, America's military has acted decisively to rout out terrorists and liberate the people of Afghanistan and Iraq. America is safer as a result.



The President Protects Wildlife and Homes with Healthy Forests Initiative

This week, President Bush reinforced the need for his Healthy Forests Initiative during a visit to the wildfire scarred Coronado National Forest in Arizona. President Bush's Healthy Forests Initiative establishes a more effective and timely process to protect homes, wildlife habitats and forests from catastrophic fires. The President's latest budget more than doubles the funding for forest health programs.

Key components of the President's Healthy Forests Initiative include:

  • Prioritizing projects that protect homes and wildlife: Prioritizes projects that will restore and care for our forests and rangelands, reduces the risk to communities, and protects threatened and endangered species habitat;
  • Promoting cooperation: Encourages timely review of forest restoration and rehabilitation projects through collaboration with state, local, tribal governments and other community members while adhering to environmental standards;
  • Involving local communities: Local communities have a tremendous stake in effective forest management and have an important voice in the President's initiative.

  • Read President Bush's remarks at Coronado National Forest.
  • Learn more about the President's environment agenda.



President Announces New EPA Administrator, Governor Mike Leavitt

On Monday, President Bush nominated Utah Gov. Mike Leavitt to be the new director of the Environmental Protection Agency. The President praised Gov. Leavitt as a leader committed to results in cleaning our air and water, saying "Mike Leavitt will come to the EPA with a strong environmental record and a strong desire to improve on what has taken place during the last three decades.... Governor Leavitt has been a leader in applying high standards in air quality, and he understands the importance of clear standards in every environmental policy."



Excerpts of President Bush's Speech in Miramar, California
Thursday, August 14, 2003

"I'm honored to be in the presence of the men and women who wear our nation's uniform. I'm proud of you, and I want to thank you for your service to our great country. Each of you serves in a crucial time in our nation's history. And this nation is grateful for the sacrifice and service you make."

"This nation is at war with people who hate what we stand for. We love freedom, and we're not going to change. Our country depends on you to protect our freedom, and every day, you depend on your families. This has been a challenging time for military families. I know that. During the last year, our families and our military have met hardships, and met them together. You've supported and looked out for one another. You've been strong and faithful to the people you love. Military families make tremendous sacrifices for America, and our nation is grateful for your service to our country."

"Our nation is waging a broad and unrelenting campaign against the global terror network, and we're winning ... In the last two days, we captured a major terrorist, named Hambali. He's a known killer who was a close associate of September the 11th mastermind Khalid Shaykh Muhammad. Hambali [Riduan Isamuddin] was one of the world's most lethal terrorists who is suspected of planning major terrorist operations ..."

"The war on terror also continues in Iraq ...Thanks to our military, Iraqi citizens do not have to fear a secret police, arbitrary arrests, or loved ones lost forever, and mass graves. Thanks to our military, the torture chambers of a dictator are closed, the prison cells for children are empty. Thanks to our military, Saddam Hussein will never threaten anybody with a weapon of mass destruction."

"As our nation confronts great challenges, we rely, as always, on the goodness and courage of the men and women of our military. Like all our men and women who continue to serve in Iraq, you've done hard duty, far from home and family, and I know you'll never forget the people who fought at your side."
Click here for FULL TRANSCRIPT


*************************

TODAY'S LINKS!

Point of View: Democrats' trips help state GOP

By Pat McFerron


While there is no doubt the Democrat presidential debate has generated donations for the state Democrat Party, when it comes to influencing Oklahomans, which party really benefits from the national Democratic leadership visiting our conservative state? While some would argue this mobilizes Democrat activists, our recent survey indicates the opposite -- Republican candidates will be the likely beneficiaries of the increased presence of national Democrats in the state.

Republicans, not Democrats, are paying much closer attention to the Democrat nomination process. The most viable explanation is the national Democrats fail to inspire their party faithful, but tend to infuriate those in the opposition. How else can one explain that 40 percent of Republicans know that Al Gore's former running mate, Joe Lieberman, is pursuing the nomination, while only 23 percent of registered Democrats do? Similarly, 21 percent of Republicans can mention Howard Dean's anti-Bush candidacy, while only 15 percent of Democrats are so aware.

Only 37 percent of the state's registered Democrats can name even a single candidate running for the nomination. Even among Democrats who have participated in recent primary elections, only 47 percent can name just one of the candidates. In contrast, 58 percent of all of the state's registered Republicans are able to list a Democrat candidate. This should not be interpreted to mean that the Republicans will consider voting for the eventual Democrat nominee; in fact, the opposite is true. Among Republicans aware of at least one of the Democratic candidates, 95 percent are already committed to re-electing George W. Bush.

It's easy to see why having one of the presidential candidates representing the Democrats is exciting to Republicans and discouraging to state Democrats. While the Republicans in Oklahoma would be excited about having a trial lawyer (Edwards), a dove (Dean), a member of the Clinton/Gore team (Lieberman), a big labor sympathizer (Gephardt), or any of the other candidates representing their opposition, many of the state's Democrats, including the governor, seem to be avoiding making any endorsements. As such, the Democrat rank and file is not paying attention. Why should they when their leaders at home are at best reluctant to embrace the leadership of the national party?

Republicans, however, are paying attention. And they will pay even more attention once a nominee is selected. Given the posturing of the current Democrat candidates, it is a virtual certainty that the eventual nominee will have supported numerous positions -- ranging from advocating gay marriage to promoting tax increases or supporting Bill or Hillary Clinton -- that are out of touch with Oklahoma's conservative values.

The real question is whether the conservatives who remain registered Democrats will pay attention. They may already be doing so. Already, 49 percent of those Democrats who can name any of the Democrat presidential candidates are indicating an intention to vote for Bush. This trend is likely to continue if elected Democrat leaders in the state selfishly decide against creating a wall of defense between local candidates and their national party nominee. Without the enthusiastic support and endorsement of local Democrats creating a buffer, Bush's coattails could prove very long in Oklahoma.

McFerron is director of survey research with Cole Hargrave Snodgrass & Associates. He has conducted polling for national and state campaigns, including Oklahoma's right-to-work campaign, Oklahoma City's MAPS for Kids election and local and legislative campaigns.

* * * * * * * * * * * *

Bush Says Power Grid Needs Modernizing

By JENNIFER LOVEN
Associated Press Writer

SAN DIEGO (AP) -- President Bush said he will order a review of why so many states were hit by a massive power blackout Thursday and said he suspects the nation's electrical grid will have to be modernized.

"Millions of people's lives are affected," the president said. "I fully understand that their lives will not be normal for the short run."

But he added, "Slowly but surely we're coping with this massive national problem."

The outage spread to states from New York to Michigan and affected major cities in Canada as well.

Once power is restored, Bush said he would order a review of "why the cascade was so significant, why it was able to ripple so significantly throughout our system up East."

Speaking to reporters at a downtown hotel during a two-day California trip, the president said the assessment would determine just what caused the problem and whether the U.S. electrical grid would need to be modernized as a result.

"I happen to think it does," he said. "It's a serious situation."

Still, Bush sought to provide some reassurance to a shaken public.

The first priority, Bush said, is to deal with the consequences of the blackout and "get electricity up and running as quickly as possible."

"I have been working with federal officials to make sure the response to the situation was quick and thorough and I believe it has been," the president said. "We're offering all the help they need to help people cope with this blackout."

Bush pointed to the resumption of some flights at LaGuardia and Newark airports near New York as an example of federal involvement and a sign the situation was beginning to come under control.

Bush credited local and state emergency officials with quickly getting a handle on the problem - and said they have not yet asked much of the federal government

"Not much - because they're well-prepared," he said. "We're better organized today than we were 2 1/2 years ago to deal with an emergency."

Bush also said it "has been remarkable to watch on television" how calmly individuals reacted.

Bush said it wasn't clear yet what caused the initial problem but promised that officials would figure it out once people's immediate needs are met. "One thing I think I can say for certain is that this was not a terrorist act," he said.

Bush was notified about the outage by Deputy Chief of Staff Joe Hagin while he was having lunch with Marines at a military base in southern California. He received updates through the rest of the day from top aides.

Vice President Dick Cheney was on vacation in Jackson, Wyo., during the blackout. White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card was in Maine, press spokesman Claire Buchan said, but he consulted by telephone with New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg.

Officials from the White House and National Security Council later held a video conference call with officials from the departments of Energy, Homeland Security, Treasury, State, the FBI and other agencies, White House press secretary Scott McClellan said.

The meeting was organized to make sure the federal government was ready to help to meet any request that might arise from state and local governments, he said.

* * * * * * * * * *

Dem Presidential Candidates Oppose Recall

Aug 15, 3:41 AM EDT

By RON FOURNIER
AP Political Writer

DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) -- Democratic presidential candidates oppose the California recall drive, but are divided along with other party leaders over strategy to avoid a Republican takeover.

Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut and Rep. Dennis Kucinich of Ohio denounced the effort to recall Gov. Gray Davis, but said Thursday they want the party to rally behind a Democratic alternative in case Davis is thrown out.

"I'm against the recall, I think it's wrong. But I think people ought to have a choice beyond Arnold Schwarzenegger and Larry Flynt," said Lieberman, endorsing Lt. Gov. Cruz Bustamante. Actor Schwarzenegger and Flynt, a pornography publisher, are candidates on the Oct. 8 ballot.

Most of Lieberman's rivals don't want to talk about an alternative to Davis.

"I think (the recall drive) insults the democracy of this country, and it's wrong, and Californians should not be making a choice about which candidate ought to replace Gray Davis," said Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts.

The split is emblematic of a debate within the national Democratic Party over recall strategy. Some party leaders say backing Bustamante will hurt Davis' ability to fend off the recall, and would not necessarily guarantee victory for the Democrat against the GOP slate. Others said Davis' recall is inevitable; they want to unite quickly behind a strong Democratic alternative.

"Democrats are trying to come to terms with the situation while standing on constantly shifting terrain," said Democratic strategist Michael Feldman of Washington.

Former President Clinton has given Davis advice for surviving the recall drive, comparing the effort to his GOP-led impeachment trial. Associates say Clinton may campaign for Davis in September if the governor wants his help and if it looks like the assistance would pay off.

They said there is another possibility: If Davis cannot reverse polls that show wide support for his recall, Clinton might find it necessary to urge the governor to resign and pave way for Bustamante. The associates, speaking on condition of anonymity, said any scenarios involving Clinton is highly speculative because the political landscape is so fluid.

Presidential campaign advisers said they will closely watch the recount drive and Davis' poll numbers as they decide whether to get more involved.

For now, Lieberman is the only candidate fully invested in the recall drive.

"Cruz Bustamante is a friend of mine, he's chairman of my campaign here in California," Lieberman said.

While seven of his rivals maintained a heavy schedule in Iowa, site of the nation's first presidential voting, Lieberman rushed to the West Coast to inject himself in the nation's biggest political story.

"It's a political power play against a governor who has governed in hard times," he said.

In Iowa, Rep. Dennis Kucunich, D-Ohio, said Democrats have to fight the recall while also "making sure they have a backup plan."

Former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean said: "It sounds to me like an attempt by the Republicans to reverse the results of an election, which they have a habit of doing."

He said he didn't know enough about California politics to support an alternative to Davis.

Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina said he opposes the recall because California has recently elected Davis, and he will not back an alternative.

Former Illinois Sen. Carol Moseley Braun said she hopes the recall will fail and plans to campaign on Davis' behalf.

Seven of the presidential hopefuls attended a health care forum at Drake University sponsored by Gov. Tom Vilsack, incoming chairman of the Democratic Governors Association. He called the recall drive a "novelty" and said his group is almost certain to donate money to help the California party fight the effort.

The money could help Davis or Bustamante, he said.

At Vilsack's forum, the Democratic presidential candidates criticized President Bush and large pharmaceutical companies.

Most of the major Democratic candidates have offered plans to expand the nation's health care system, and would finance their efforts by repealing various portions of the tax cut the president pushed through Congress.

"America has a choice, it can have tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans or health care for all Americans," Kerry said.



TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: blackout; candidates; dem; electionpresident; lieberman; powergrids; recall
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

While Pres Bush stays out of the California Recall, Sen Joe Lieberman is attempting to make political gain by inserting himself in the CA Recall with his support of Davis/Bustamante! Remember the next time anyone tells you that LIEberman is centrist -- he is actually a Democrat liberal supporting two very liberal Dems in Davis/Bustamante! This "centrist" Voting Score from the American Conservative Union is:

2002 - 20;2001 - 28;Lifetime (14 years)- 20

Don't know about you, but a 20 Rating for a Lifetime Conservative Voting Record makes Senator Lieberman a Liberal IMHO.

FYI, Cong Chris Shays (R-CT) had a 76 conservative voting record in 2002!

1 posted on 08/15/2003 8:49:46 AM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing; onyx; JohnHuang2; Dog Gone; Dog; isthisnickcool; OKSooner; VOA; mhking; ...
This past week is a prime example of Democrat Liberal Media lies and why Bush-Cheney '04 needs your support.

The Media reported based on the statements of Democrat candidates that the hazardous duty pay and separation allowance for our military would expire on Sep 30, 2003, and the Bush Administration was doing nothing. Even when the Department of Defense put out a statement that the military would get the money from other sources if it expired -- the media chose to stay silent on the TRUTH! Below is the DoD Press Release:

IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Aug 14, 2003

DoD Statement on Family Separation Allowance and Imminent Danger Pay

In April, after the President's Budget was submitted, Congress authorized an increase in both the Family Separation Allowance (on a worldwide basis) and Imminent Danger Pay and legislated that these increases would expire on Sept. 30, 2003. The department is aware of the problem that would result for those serving in Iraq and Afghanistan if these allowances were allowed to expire. This is an issue of targeting those most deserving, and certainly people serving in Iraq and Afghanistan are in these categories. We intend to ensure they continue to receive this compensation at least at the current levels.

* * * * * * *


2 posted on 08/15/2003 8:56:06 AM PDT by PhiKapMom (VOTE FOR ARNOLD -- GOP's Best Chance to Tank Hillary for 2004 and beyond!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Joe Liebarman Nick-name contest! (Because thwacki9ng dead horses pumps up your biceps)

Enter your suggestions below:

1. LIEberman (PhiKapMom)
2. LoserMan (FL GOP)
3. Lamsterman (redruM)

additions always welcomed.
3 posted on 08/15/2003 8:58:14 AM PDT by .cnI redruM ("My Glass is Gettin' Shorter, On Some WHiskey and Some Water" - AC/DC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Bush/Cheney ... 2004!

Be Ever Vigilant!
4 posted on 08/15/2003 9:59:24 AM PDT by blackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom

5 posted on 08/15/2003 10:13:34 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Check out the Texas Chicken D 'RATS!: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/keyword/Redistricting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
ROFLOL!!! I like that!
6 posted on 08/15/2003 11:15:58 AM PDT by PhiKapMom (VOTE FOR ARNOLD -- GOP's Best Chance to Tank Hillary for 2004 and beyond!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Thanks for posting one of my favorites!
7 posted on 08/15/2003 11:16:31 AM PDT by PhiKapMom (VOTE FOR ARNOLD -- GOP's Best Chance to Tank Hillary for 2004 and beyond!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
and Californians should not be making a choice about which candidate ought to replace Gray Davis," said Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts.

My goodness. Did this guy see our (liberal) field poll that came out today?

3 words;

Political Tin Ear.

8 posted on 08/15/2003 5:50:47 PM PDT by PeoplesRep_of_LA (Governor McClintock on October 7, 2003!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeoplesRep_of_LA
Sometimes I wonder if people like Kerry -- must be running for office all those years in liberal MA makes him completely out of tune with the rest of the Country!
9 posted on 08/15/2003 6:58:20 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (VOTE FOR ARNOLD -- GOP's Best Chance to Tank Hillary for 2004 and beyond!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM; PhiKapMom

Joe No-Core-Value-Man

10 posted on 08/15/2003 9:08:24 PM PDT by PhilDragoo (Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Years ago I interviewed Mike DiSalle then Governor of Ohio. He was running for relection in a race he lost.

He told me it was difficult to gauge public reaction to his proposals... He said he never met anyone opposed to his views.

I think that is very true of most candidates. They are met by the party faithful who reinforce their beliefs. Rarely does a candidate get to learn the views of the centrists that decide their fate. No handler wants a candidate in a situation where he is confronted by people who are opposed to his views. So candidates live in a world isolated from accurate views of public opinion.

As Mike pointed out, the danger is that a candidate will believe his own eyes and ears and not the people who do the polls and conduct the focus groups.

Kerry strikes me as a man who "knows it all". He is the most likely candidate to ignore good advise and follow the bad advise of his gut. I don't think Kerry is going anywhere. Kerry appears to me to always be thinking of his strategic position. What he says is based on what he thinks of his current situation. Since he has no real beliefs he can't remember what he said in the last stategic situation. And he has as many opinions as he has situations.

It would be fun to hear the media jokes about Kerry. Bet your bottom dollar there are a lot of them.

11 posted on 08/16/2003 3:57:43 AM PDT by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
BTT
12 posted on 08/16/2003 5:23:19 AM PDT by windchime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
How many days until Bush signs the RENEWAL of the unConstitutional Assault Weapons Ban?

How many days until Bush signs the AMNESTY bill for millions of illegal Mexican parasites?

How many..how many...how many....and on it goes.

13 posted on 08/16/2003 8:04:49 AM PDT by HadEnough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator
Years ago I interviewed Mike DiSalle then Governor of Ohio. He was running for relection in a race he lost.

He told me it was difficult to gauge public reaction to his proposals... He said he never met anyone opposed to his views.

This reminds me of Bernard Goldberg's story about the Upper West Side chatterer who wondered aloud how Nixon had beaten McGovern in 1972. She claimed that "no one she knew voted for Nixon".

Echo chamber.

I wonder how one compares Kerry to Dean. Dean appears to be driven by his own convictions, although I strongly suspect that he is malleable enough to try to make himself presentable for a general election campaign. Can Dean pull off a Nixon and tack to the right? I'm not sure. Remember that the people around Nixon were very good, and their boss had a political instinct that I have yet to see matched by any other politician, with the possible exception of Bill Clinton.

Agree with you on Kerry, btw. Sort of like a jumped up version of John Edwards: there's no there there. One thing about Dean, though. I'm not sure that he's getting the feedback he needs to be a better general election candidate. Recalling your admonition that the people will tend to vote for the candidate who is trying to solve the problem, I'm not sure that Dean brings a lot to the table other than a jazzed up base.

No one wins elections on anger alone.

Be Seeing You,

Chris

14 posted on 08/16/2003 8:14:02 AM PDT by section9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: section9
No one wins elections on anger alone.

I saw a Dean statement that he made to an AP reporter in 1995. The 1994 election saw the loss of the house and senate seats to the Republicans. The democrats also lost governorships as well as state legislatures in 1994. The Democratic governors were angry with Clinton so Bill called a meeting with the Democrat governors to have them advise him on what to do. Dean was a Democratic Governor in attendance.

After that closed meeting Dean was approched by an AP reporter who asked what transpired. Dean replied, "Well no one urged him (Clinton) to move to the left."

Note what Dean said. It shows skill. Dean did not say they urged Clinton to move to the right although that is the clear inference. If he hads said that the reporter would have asked who urged Clinton to tac to the right. If Dean had then refused to name names the reporters story would have said Dean refused to say who urged Clinton to the right. The reporter could have used what Dean said as a lever on the other governors to gain more information. Instead Dean phrased it as a negative. That did not leave the reporter anywhere to go. That shows some skill.

I think that Dean may be pragmatic. He needs the nomination. He may also think he can move to the right if he wins it. But you can bet that in the 2004 debates a candidate Dean would get his own words thrown back at him. With all he has said, video of Dean saying x followed by video of Dean saying y would be enough to defeat him.

I think at this point, Dean is saying I must do what I must do to get the nomination. Once I get it, I will worry about defeating Bush.

I don't think Dean really believes he can win. But no one thought Clinton could win... but he did. So Dean is gambling hoping for Clinton's luck.

I still think that Gephardt will get the nomination. He has the backing of 11 major unions. And the word is he has most of the 20 percent of the appointed delegates to the convention sewen up. If that is the case, Gephardt needs to only win 30 percent more of the delegates. The other candidates will have to win 50 percent. What I hear is that Gephardt is 40 percent of the way to the Delegate goal, before a single primary is held.

15 posted on 08/16/2003 2:39:34 PM PDT by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom

How many days until Bush signs the RENEWAL of the unConstitutional Assault Weapons Ban?

How many days until Bush signs the AMNESTY bill for millions of illegal Mexican parasites?

How many..how many...how many....and on it goes.


16 posted on 08/16/2003 2:55:32 PM PDT by MatthewViti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MatthewViti
If you want to go around screaming in loud font that you are an idiot, nobody here will stop you.

Dubya will not sign an awb renewal unless congress sends it back to him.

Dubya will not sign an amnesty bill unless congress sends it to him.

Do you really think a Republican congress will send those 2 pieces of legislation to the President when the President has expressed his intention to sign them?

Why are you getting all worked up over things that will not happen? Your behavior is stupid.
17 posted on 08/16/2003 8:31:49 PM PDT by Once-Ler (Proud Republican and Bushbot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator

Thanks for the response. Dean is saying what he has to say to get the nomination, and does intend to move right in a General. That's classic Nixon. Unfortunately for Dean, as you suggest, that's where Karl Rove's AudioVisual crew will get him.

In my lifetime, the two guys who didn't try to do that were Goldwater and McGovern. Look what happened to them.

It's not that Dean is not malleable; he is. But he's trying to get the base vote over to him by making them angrier than they need to be. This will hurt him in the long run.

BTW, I didn't know Gephardt had that many delegates locked up. Bob Dole redux?

Oh, btw, would you mind if I linked your "Weekly Commentary" page to my blog. Your stuff is absolutely superb.

Be Seeing You,

Chris

18 posted on 08/16/2003 10:22:56 PM PDT by section9 (To see my blog, click on the Major!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Take me OFF your ping list .. Private mail didn't work
19 posted on 08/17/2003 4:57:14 AM PDT by Utopia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: section9
Oh, btw, would you mind if I linked your "Weekly Commentary" page to my blog. Your stuff is absolutely superb

Hi Chris,

I would be pleased and honored if you link to my commentary.

thanks

ray

20 posted on 08/17/2003 5:13:26 AM PDT by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson