As far as the cover-ups are concerned, the only opinion I can advance is that professional intellectuals, despite the political positions they undertake, always have a Toryish streak to them. (To be fair, the standards of their trade contain a bias towards Toryishness.)
Wilson also appointed as Secretary of State that paragon of virtue, the virulently racist and anti-Semitic perennial Democrat nominee, William Jennings Bryan. His famous (or infamous) "Cross of Gold" speech referred to the same "New York Jews" that seem to have so troubled Harry Truman.Bryan was a wuss. My namesake even beat his butt without leaving his own patio.
It looks like Slick Willie will be the third voted off.
Is that supposed to be sarcasm?
I presume that the author is being sarcastic - the income tax was the beginning of the Imperial Federal Government. And the 17th Amendment, also enacted during the Wilson years (which changed the way U.S. Senators assumed power from being appointed by state legislatures to a popular election), was the last nail in the coffin for state's rights.
But probably the biggest blows to liberty during the Wilson Administration were the first successful movements to enact national prohibition laws: the Harrison Narcotics Act, passed in 1914, and growing power of the so-called temperance movement which led to the 18th (Prohibition) Amendment which was passed the year after Wilson left office. The fallout from these doomed attempts to defy human nature started the greatest crime wave in American history in the 1920's, and contributed to the destruction of the American inner cities and the corruption of several generations of minority youth.
Yes, the author is correct: Wilson was the Very Worst President of the United States - even worse than Clinton.
I happen to agree with the author of this piece that Wilson was one of our very worst presidents. My reasons are many and varied, from his foreign policy (not really neutral in WWI from the beginning) to his propaganda campaign during WWI, the 1919 Red Scare excesses against civil liberties, his championship of the income tax, the Federal reserve, and, of course, the extreme Southern bigotry of his views, although as one descended from Southerners I hardly take a pro-Radical Reconstruction view of the period.
Curiously, my dislike of Wilson was actually formed reading the major ostensibly favorable multivolume biography by Leuchtenberg. One of the best short takes on Wilson is a little known (today) book by Sigmund Freud and Thomas Bullit titled Thomas Woodrow Wilson, in which the father of psychoanaltic frummery describes the psyche of "Little Tommy Wilson". It really is a must read for conservatives.
A couple of notes on the article: Wilson did appoint William Jennings Bryan as secretary of state, but the two never got along: Wilson was a psuedo-aristocrat, former president of Princeton, and Bryan a populist, though by no means a stupid or uneducated man. I mentioned above that Wilson was not really neutral during WWI, conspiring essentially with Sir Edward Grey, the British Foreign Secretary, (through is emmissary, Col. House, who pretty much described the whole thing in his memoirs) to tilt American 'neutrality' against the Central Powers and towards the Brits. Bryan, an honest patriot even if a fundamentalist mountebank in many respects, was appalled and, in what I have elsewhere described as the one principled act of his entire life, resigned as secretary of state in 1915 over the matter.
Wilson was also heavily under the influence of his wife, who was practically running the government after his stroke. Wilson's insistance that the US Senate accept the League of Nations "as is" ensured its rejection and failure.
Moreover, Wilson's whole vision of the post WWI world, the Fourteen Points, and the entire performance of the American delegation at the Versailles Peace Conference in 1919, which resulted in the infamous Treaty of Versailles, has been heavily critiziced by diplomatic historians. The classic which everyone should read on this is Peacemaking 1919 by Sir Harold Nicholson, who was a member of the British delegation. Wilson's lack of preparation was astonishing, and was a major factor in the disaster that ensued. I don't know if the book is still read, but when I was a graduate student in European history, it was one of those books you had to know, rather like Fritz Fischer's Germany's Aims in the First World War (Griff nach der Weltmacht in German)
A future historian might possibly say the same thing about George Herbert Walker Bush in 80 years. The legacy of clinton is yet to be finally written in blood, much of it probably American.
1. Why don't these facts appear in the mainstream textbooks, even as an "Alternate Point of View";
2. And why is it that a bunch of conservative Internet renegades (some Canadian) seem to be the only ones bringing these things up?
Maybe because they're not really as "factual" as this author would have us believe? Not that Wilson was any great shakes -- his mistakes are well documented -- but this "analysis" is far too simplistic.
The article is also misinformed: Japan was not a "one of the major allied powers." They sent a very modest number of troops to Europe, a few ships to the Mediterranean, and harassed the Germans in China.
Why would the author make such a claim? Apparently to lay the blame for Pearl Harbor at Wilson's feet -- a rather arrogant assumption that excludes Japanese imperialism. (Unless the author would like to blame Japan's invasion of China on Wilson, too....)
Bullsh!t. It's likely that we'd have ended up in WWI regardless of who won in 1916. And it's also likely that American post-war foreign policy wouldn't have been too much different from what it turned out to be (i.e., isolationist).
And of course, there's the fallacious reasoning that only American influences led to the rise of Nazism, Fascism, Communism, and Japanese Imperialism, and the second World War that resulted from these expansionist regimes.
was undoubtedly one Lyndon Baines Johnson.
Because textbooks are NEA propoganda, and little else.
Lying Under Oath as President ~ Lying Under Oath in a Deposition ~ Lying Under Oath to a Grand Jury ~ Lying Under Oath as a Lawyer ~ Abuse of Power ~ Obstruction of Justice ~ Deriliction of Duty ~ Bribe Solicitation ~ Corruption ~ Graft ~ Coersion ~ False Swearing ~ Malfeasance of Office ~ Perjury ~ Subornation of Perjury---I humbly submit that Bill and Hillary Clinton were the worst Co-Presidents this country has ever had to endure.