Skip to comments.
California State Supreme justices squelch anti-recall lawsuits
Sacramento Bee ^
| 08/08/03
| Claire Cooper
Posted on 08/08/2003 7:44:31 AM PDT by bedolido
Edited on 04/12/2004 5:54:38 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
SAN FRANCISCO -- The California Supreme Court on Thursday turned down attempts to derail the ouster vote on Gov. Gray Davis, drawing praise from recall proponents and shifting the spotlight to the federal courts. "I think (the state justices) used great wisdom and that the constitution is pretty clear about what the people want to happen in the state of California," said Ted Costa, chief organizer of the recall drive.
(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: antirecall; calgov2002; justices; lawsuits; squelch; state
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
1
posted on
08/08/2003 7:44:32 AM PDT
by
bedolido
To: bedolido; 4ConservativeJustices
Good example of a court fearing the public. This fear can be created in other cases too (Ten Commandments lawsuits for example). Courts are essentially weak. Their power derives from citizens respecting their decisions. If citizens begin to ignore the courts, it is all over for them and they know it.
2
posted on
08/08/2003 8:01:35 AM PDT
by
DPB101
To: DPB101
Does anyone know if the anti recall people are arguing any valid point of law for their side or are they just trying to win the legal lottery?
3
posted on
08/08/2003 8:06:12 AM PDT
by
Hillarys Gate Cult
("Read Hillary's hips. I never had sex with that woman.")
To: bedolido
Sounds like the california SC wants no part of the Davis train wreck. (don't forget years ago California voters recalled one of the judges over death penalty issues. They know what recalls do.)
This decision alone makes FL's SC look even more like political partisans.
To: bedolido
Greyout just won't give in gracefully, will he? He should be a gentleman and resign in the face of this overwhelming dissatisfaction with his mismanagement. But no, he's is going to have to be dragged kicking and screaming out of the governor's office suing all the way, after his hands are pried loose from the doorframe. How very mature.
5
posted on
08/08/2003 8:09:18 AM PDT
by
Texan5
To: Texan5
Rats are like that.
6
posted on
08/08/2003 8:10:48 AM PDT
by
DPB101
To: bedolido
SAN FRANCISCO -- The California Supreme Court on Thursday turned down attempts to derail the ouster vote on Gov. Gray Davis, drawing praise from recall proponents and shifting the spotlight to the federal courts. "I think (the state justices) used great wisdom and that the constitution is pretty clear about what the people want to happen in the state of California," said Ted Costa, chief organizer of the recall drive. ... The justices were unanimous in ditching a suit filed by Davis as well as three other cases. In a fifth case, they voted 5-2 against the recall challengers The justices of the California Supreme Court remember an important name in California judicial history:
Rose Bird!
Cheers!
- John
7
posted on
08/08/2003 8:24:21 AM PDT
by
Fishrrman
To: Texan5
Greyout just won't give in gracefully, will he?When have you ever seen a left-wing "liberal" do the graceful/decent/moral/ethical/honest thing?
8
posted on
08/08/2003 8:43:58 AM PDT
by
trebb
To: trebb
Well, that is certainly true, but in Greyout's case, I would think his instinct for self preservation would have taken over, at the very least. If he stays till he is removed, I doubt he will even be able to get a job as a waiter when all is said and done.
9
posted on
08/08/2003 9:14:14 AM PDT
by
Texan5
To: bedolido
What happened to the ruling that a voter in the recall can vote to keep Davis and then also vote for a replacement?
This is a big one.
10
posted on
08/08/2003 10:26:08 AM PDT
by
Mike Darancette
(Save Traditional Marriage -- It's for the Children!)
To: Mike Darancette
The original statute allows that!
In fact it required that to vote on the second part of the ballot you must vote on the First part (To recall current office holder or to keep him) .
11
posted on
08/08/2003 11:26:00 AM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(All we need from a Governor is a VETO PEN!!!)
To: *calgov2002; fooman; PeoplesRep_of_LA; Canticle_of_Deborah; NormsRevenge; snopercod; Grampa Dave; ..
12
posted on
08/08/2003 11:26:40 AM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(All we need from a Governor is a VETO PEN!!!)
To: DPB101
If citizens begin to ignore the courts, it is all over for them and they know it. Watch Alabama ;o)
13
posted on
08/08/2003 1:52:30 PM PDT
by
4CJ
(Come along chihuahua, I want to hear you say yo quiero taco bell. - Nolu Chan, 28 Jul 2003)
To: 4ConservativeJustices
14
posted on
08/08/2003 2:00:26 PM PDT
by
DPB101
To: DPB101
Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore said Thursday he may ignore a federal judge's order to remove the Ten Commandments monument he installed in ... Wow, who'd a thunk it? ;o)
What we need is more leaders with a backbone, like Ronald Reagan and Roy Moore. Of course, I'm partial to Florida Judge N. Sanders Sauls as well.
15
posted on
08/09/2003 3:56:08 AM PDT
by
4CJ
(Come along chihuahua, I want to hear you say yo quiero taco bell. - Nolu Chan, 28 Jul 2003)
To: 4ConservativeJustices
Is Sauls a Republican? Or a member of that nearly extinct species, an honest Democrat?
See the ACLU is still trying to stop the election. In a way, I hope a judge does order it stopped--the outrage will be intense.
16
posted on
08/09/2003 10:51:00 AM PDT
by
DPB101
To: DPB101
Is Sauls a Republican? Or a member of that nearly extinct species, an honest Democrat?Today he wouldn't claim affiliation with either, but someone who knows him well decribed him as the latter. Honest.
17
posted on
08/09/2003 12:02:52 PM PDT
by
4CJ
(Come along chihuahua, I want to hear you say yo quiero taco bell. - Nolu Chan, 28 Jul 2003)
To: DPB101
In a way, I hope a judge does order it stopped--the outrage will be intense. If he doesn't, the gorons of the 9th Circuit might.
18
posted on
08/09/2003 12:04:23 PM PDT
by
4CJ
(Come along chihuahua, I want to hear you say yo quiero taco bell. - Nolu Chan, 28 Jul 2003)
To: 4ConservativeJustices
From what I've read, the ACLU's complaint is that minorities are too stupid to figure out a ballot and the election should be postponed until spring. In a normal world, I would not expect any judge to agree but who knows.
19
posted on
08/09/2003 12:21:21 PM PDT
by
DPB101
To: DPB101
From what I've read, the ACLU's complaint is that minorities are too stupid to figure out a ballot and the election should be postponed until spring.LOL - how true. The Dims position (remember the Palm Beach ballot fiasco in 2000?) is that THEIR voters are too stupid to be able to cast a ballot that 5-year olds handled with ease. The ACLU is just carrying on the old traditions.
20
posted on
08/09/2003 6:07:36 PM PDT
by
4CJ
(Come along chihuahua, I want to hear you say yo quiero taco bell. - Nolu Chan, 28 Jul 2003)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson