Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mike Darancette
The original statute allows that!

In fact it required that to vote on the second part of the ballot you must vote on the First part (To recall current office holder or to keep him) .
11 posted on 08/08/2003 11:26:00 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (All we need from a Governor is a VETO PEN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: *calgov2002; fooman; PeoplesRep_of_LA; Canticle_of_Deborah; NormsRevenge; snopercod; Grampa Dave; ..
calgov2002:

calgov2002: for old calgov2002 articles. 

calgov2002: for new calgov2002 articles. 

Other Bump Lists at: Free Republic Bump List Register



12 posted on 08/08/2003 11:26:40 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (All we need from a Governor is a VETO PEN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
In fact it required that to vote on the second part of the ballot you must vote on the First part (To recall current office holder or to keep him) .

The court also ruled you do not have to vote on the first question to vote for a replacement candidate. I believe this is the only part of the recall procedures that was not upheld.

21 posted on 08/09/2003 6:10:56 PM PDT by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson