Skip to comments.
President Blames Unemployment On Lack Of Tech Skills
IEEE ^
Posted on 07/31/2003 11:53:32 AM PDT by Florida_Irish
During a Wednesday morning (July 30th) press conference, President Bush was asked a question about jobs going overseas as a result of technological innovation. His response was:
"I fully understand what you're saying. In other words, as technology races through the economy, a lot of times worker skills don't keep up with technological change."
Many people have taken his response to mean that unemployment in the high-tech sector is the result of American workers who allowed their skills to become obsolete. This is an unacceptable explanation.
(Excerpt) Read more at capwiz.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush43; freetrade; jobs; nwo; outsourcing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260, 261-280, 281-300 ... 701-711 next last
To: All
The solution is not to impose more costs on someone else, the solution is to reduce costs here. Make it cheaper to due business here. Get rid of the government drag on our economy instead of imposing it on someone else That will make our labor more attactive to foreign companies. They will come here instead of us going there. The answer isn't more government regulation it is less government regulation.
To: dirtboy
"You're so blinded by your attack mode that you can't even deal with the topic being broadened, which happens quite often on FR threads."Is your new spin now that the topic has simply been "broadened"?!
That's rich!
262
posted on
07/31/2003 1:16:43 PM PDT
by
Southack
(Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Nathaniel Fischer
I'm sure the H1-Bs aren't working for a poverty wage since they have to live here too. Guess again ...
263
posted on
07/31/2003 1:16:44 PM PDT
by
clamper1797
(Conservative by nature ... Republican in Spirit ... Patriot by Heart ... and Anti Liberal BY GOD)
To: Nathaniel Fischer
yeah, 4 families or 4 generations to a house/apartment.
To: dirtboy
Having trouble coming up with your middle class "shrinking" data?!
265
posted on
07/31/2003 1:17:30 PM PDT
by
Southack
(Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: dandelion
the IEEE should have created a forum by which this very important question WOULD be answered by Bush
So until that time (which I would like to hear of some in the past where he answered questions) he can just go on pretending that the economy's fine. Leadership is when you see a problem and head it off at the pass. Its not hoping that no one asks you a question on if offshoreing will mean that millions of college educated people will jobs tomorrow.
I wouldn't be calling Bush out on the carpet if he even once mentioned this in a talk. Or one of his administration officials either. Its like the big elephant in the room that no one wants to address.
266
posted on
07/31/2003 1:17:47 PM PDT
by
lelio
To: dirtboy
Here comes Dane again, jumping into the debate like an epileptic chihuahua. School must have just let out. Whew a bit defensive aren't you. Oh well I guess this "epileptic chihuahua" noticed that during this thread you could be construed as a Gephardt campaign worker.
BTW, if you are having such hard times, maybe you should send your resume to the Gephardt campaign. Your interview would be cordial one, IMO.
The only problem for you would be that the job will last only the next 6 months, but you can always come back on FR and complain how bad things are again.
267
posted on
07/31/2003 1:17:54 PM PDT
by
Dane
To: luckydevi
I support short term welfare only.
However, I'm a follower of the 'lower taxes and regulations' method to solve the employment problem here in the USA. Can't compete with nations that have little infrastructure costs. H1-bs are just another government handout as well.
To: Southack
There are people who are EAGER to criticize Bush for so little as repeating a question back to a reporter, a question that was about people who had been laid off from textile and manufacturing plants and what Bush was doing to help them, that was rapidly misconstrued as Bush not caring about high-tech workers seeing top-paying jobs disappear, by the way. Dude, he didn't just rephrase it, he said "I completely understand" - the problem any more is not training, it's that the jobs are going away. You can train someone for a year to be a customer support rep with good computer skills to go with it, but if most of the support jobs have been shipped overseas by the time they graduate, what friggin' good does it do? I have NEVER heard Bush say that we should end H1-B visas, L1 visas and come up with ways to make it more attractive for companies to keep jobs here instead of shipping them overseas.
269
posted on
07/31/2003 1:18:49 PM PDT
by
dirtboy
(Who's that big cat I saw roaming around here again?)
To: luckydevi
I do not believe that there is an inherent right to a job. I believe the American Constitution was enacted to protect the people of the United States of America from being preyed upon by foreign powers. i believe taht everyone has a right to sell their skill for teh maximum they can obtain for tehm in the nation where they reside or they may sell them in any nation where they leaglly emigrate. I believe they have a right to negotiate their compensation with those who would buy there skills. I do not believe that the government should have intervened by in these negotiations between employer and employee via the H1b visa program.
I further believe that a tarif policy should be adopted that will guarantee access to foreign markets by means of reciprocal agreements. I recognize that tariffs are Constitutional and should be used to deal with such things as currency manipulations and foreign business subsidies.
Further I recognize that it is necessary for teh USA to encourage some industries essential to our national defense. I believe in Free markets and minimal regulation of business within this nation.
If you are asking me if I believe that everyone should work for their living in a personal sense I do.
270
posted on
07/31/2003 1:19:14 PM PDT
by
harpseal
(Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown)
To: TheSpottedOwl
Part of being a conservative is in the belief of the free market. Welfare is anti-capitalist, not pro-capitalist. Are you sure you are on the right board?
To: harpseal
The name Marxism is not old, but the concept has always existed. Living your life for the collective good of society (as determined by so-called patriots) is nothing new.
I am not defending the status quo. I do not agree with our mixed economy. I do not agree with tax-dollars subsidizing any part of the market or any foreign government.
I simply disagree with you, or anyone else telling others how to run their business. If you do not agree with the hiring policies of the tech industry, do not purchase their products. If you think that someone is unfairly unemployed, give them your job. If you think you can make a quality product by hiring only Americans, then do so. I would never coerce you to make decisions in your life. That's not Marxism, that's freedom. That's American.
272
posted on
07/31/2003 1:19:59 PM PDT
by
wesdale
To: Mr. Jeeves
The unemployed smart males will be even more dangerous. They are able to organize rebellion. Nothing is more dangerous to a political state than large numbers of pissed off and energized high IQ people. The recall of Gray Davis is an early symptom of this - that's why the elites are so freaked out by it.
Don't forget the women who are sitting there jobless with kids to support. I'm hoping that a degree in English will get me a job with a living wage and benefits (proof reading and editing-I can already do it, but need a degree). My kids? Their father has proven to be too selfish to put the oldest ones through community college, and I don't know what the 2 at home are going to do for jobs. Guess they'd better learn Spanish...
273
posted on
07/31/2003 1:20:04 PM PDT
by
TheSpottedOwl
(You bring tar, I'll bring feathers....recall Davis in 03!!!)
To: luckydevi
even if you cut tax rates to zero, and stripped all worker protections, you cannot equalize the costs of a first world worker with a third world worker, unless you want to totally throw the idea of standard of living out the window. and that of course is the crux of it, our elites don't much like the middle class and their standard of living, since that appears as a "cost" on their balance sheet. those private jets are expensive you know.
To: dirtboy
we can defeat them with our MRI machines
Provided that we can still send the scans over to be read in India that is.
Also, how is anyone going to be able to pay for their services? Its what I like to call the "We can't all serve expensive coffee to one another" economy.
275
posted on
07/31/2003 1:20:19 PM PDT
by
lelio
To: dirtboy
But training out-of-work manufacturing workers for tech jobs that are the most likely candidates to be outsourced overseas is definitely NOT one of the possible answers. What this shows is that Bush has given little or no thought to the realities of the modern job market. I missed that one. When and where did he say we should be training out-of-work manufacturing folks for tech jobs that were most likely to be outsourced? As for your snide comment about fighting with MRI's, who do you think puts the fighting soldier together again? Java programmers? Yeah, the American Techie: keeping us safe from the French for 200 years. One cannot do without the other, my shortsighted friend.
To: dirtboy
But training out-of-work manufacturing workers for tech jobs
This is not what he said.
we need to make sure that people get the training necessary to keep up with the nature of the jobs, as jobs change
As jobs requirements change, we all need to change to keep up with them or we will get left behind. This usually involves learning about some new technology, but it does not mean moving to a tech-job.
To: Dane
I'm doing just fine, Dane. But having been through some tough times last year, I haven't forgotten that there are millions of people still in tough times this year.
BTW, your "[insert Dem presidential candidate] campaign worker" is getting really lame - maybe your mom can help you come up with a new insult to use come August.
278
posted on
07/31/2003 1:20:58 PM PDT
by
dirtboy
(Who's that big cat I saw roaming around here again?)
To: clamper1797
Report by the Merky News in Sillycon valley last year. H1B's are only here for a short while. They commonly live with other H1B's 10-12 in a house. They are actually preferred to American workers not only for the substandard wages paid them but because the company can force them to work exhaustive hours knowing that the H1B can not complain for fear of losing their sponser (the company) and being sent back home. The companies also know that the H1B CANNOT seek employment elsewhere. H1B's are little better than indentured servents and are treated as such
279
posted on
07/31/2003 1:22:04 PM PDT
by
clamper1797
(Conservative by nature ... Republican in Spirit ... Patriot by Heart ... and Anti Liberal BY GOD)
Comment #280 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260, 261-280, 281-300 ... 701-711 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson