Posted on 07/27/2003 7:49:37 PM PDT by weegee
There is no doubt that the deaths of his two sons will be a devastating blow to Saddam Hussein, but those who hope that their loss will leave him a broken man are likely to be disappointed.
He'll probably release another audiotape in the next few days saying that he has sacrificed his two sons for the struggle and calling on other Iraqis to be prepared to do the same, one veteran of the Iraqi opposition observed.
What was already a life-and-death struggle for Saddam is now also a blood feud.
Even so, his grief must be extreme. Saddam has always been a family man. One of the very few jokes known to have been coined by the ex-dictator of Iraq concerns the late Uday, who, so Saddam used to quip, had been an "activist" from an early age. This is in reference to the time in 1964 when Saddam was in jail and his wife, Sajida Khairallah Telfah, would bring baby Uday for a visit -- with secret messages from Saddam's fellow Baathist conspirators concealed in Uday's nappies.
Later, when he was cleaving his way to absolute power, Saddam's primary instruments were close family members -- his half-brothers Barzan, Watban and Sabawi, as well as his uncle, Khairallah Telfah, and cousin Adnan. Son-in-law Hussein Kamel Majid emerged as a central pillar of the regime in the 1980s, as did another member of Saddam's Majid relatives, Ali Hassan al Majid.
It was a classic example of tribal rule.
Proximity to the throne through blood ties, however, was no guarantee of job security. Saddam's brothers lost their influence -- all had been prominent in the repressive security services -- after their mother died in 1982. Adnan Khairallah played a vital role as minister of defense in the Iran-Iraq war of the 1980s -- a little too successfully, perhaps, given that he died soon after the cease-fire in a mysterious helicopter crash. Hussein Kamel Majid was executed for his temporary defection to Jordan in 1995.
In the dangerous quicksand of court politics under Saddam Hussein, only his sons were above the law. Others might be punished for particularly egregious crimes, such as the occasion when the family was lined up to watch cousin Luai Khairallah have his arm broken by Saddam for assaulting his school teacher. But Uday and Qusay appear to have enjoyed total impunity. (Saddam did allegedly consider harshly punishing Uday for murdering his food taster in 1988, but soon relented.) They were the only people whom he felt he could totally and unreservedly trust, and now he has lost them.
Further, the manner of their death has ominous implications for the hunted Iraqi leader, given that they apparently were betrayed by their Mosul hosts. The opulence of Nawaf Zaidan's villa, at least before it was riddled with American gunfire, suggests that he did well under the old regime, but that was evidently no bar to his vastly increasing his fortune by exchanging his guests for the immense reward on offer.
It is also worth noting that the hiding place selected by the two fugitives was hardly obscure, suggesting that the family is not exactly melting into the population.
Abid Hamid Mahmud Tikriti, Saddam's private secretary, could think of no more imaginative place to hide than in one of his many residences, where he was duly apprehended. If Saddam is lurking in a similar bolt hole, then it seems entirely possible that he will be unearthed in the near future.
Hardly less ominous for Saddam is the rattle of celebratory gunfire in Baghdad at the news of his sons' deaths. He may never have labored under the illusion that the people of Iraq love him, but the fact that Baghdadis at least should express such jubilation at the passing of Uday and Qusay indicates that there is little possibility of a groundswell of support in Iraq for a Saddam regime restoration.
The fact that those guns may tomorrow be turned on the U.S. occupation forces under the inspiration of Iraqi nationalism or Islamic fervor is of little use or consolation to him.
Thus Saddam's options are ever more limited. All he really has left is his image of himself as the dauntless Arab fighter who will never back away from a duel. Now that almost everything he once possessed, including his family, is gone, he is once again a hunted fugitive, just as he was in the winter of 1959 after his failed attempt to assassinate the then-leader of Iraq.
Under his subsequent rule, the story of that flight, complete with happy ending, became the stuff of legend, books and a movie.
This time there is little chance of a happy ending. All he can hope for is the legend.
Cockburn is the co-author of Out of the Ashes: The Resurrecction of Saddam Hussein.
BS. If he did, it would be the first time that Saddam offered concrete details to confirm that he is still alive. Bet he still wouldn't mention what city his sons died in.
There is no doubt that the deaths of his two sons will be a devastating blow to Saddam Hussein, but those who hope that their loss will leave him a broken man are likely to be disappointed.
No, we're trying to use TOW missiles to leave him a broken man.
He'll probably release another audiotape in the next few days...
Sounds like a really good idea, what with us hot on his trail and all.
What was already a life-and-death struggle for Saddam is now also a blood feud.
Uh oh. Maybe now Saddam will put us on DOUBLE SECRET PROBATION.
Maybe Saddam should be the one worried about starting "blood feuds"... it might not have been such a good idea to try to whack Daddy Bush.
Cockburn can't help but load up his column with sympathy for the genocidal mass murderer/torturer/rapist/terrorist/etc. If Bush thinks Saddam is bad, Saddam must be good. If Bush is happy with Saddam's sons dead, then Cockburn must be upset.
Well, actually, there are other ways to bring that about. But in their MOST CHERISHED wet dream, America is defeated/humiliated/crushed AND they win back the WH.
Okay. It is official. This guy is stupid, ignorant or simply nuts.
It. Has. Been. A. Blood. Feud. For. The. Past. Twelve. Years.
Do you think that is clear enough? Or should I break it down a bit more?
If that fails, well shoot.
I'd say it's just the settling of a blood feud.
And now it's personal.....
How cute. How so like American "activists".
How cute. How so like American "activists".
Kind of like Bill Clinton. He had his praetorian guard who would fetch fresh women to rape.
This is a pro-Saddam spin piece, period.
Yup. This has been a blood feud for a long time, among the other things it has been. Personally, I like the idea of Saddam grieving and suffering for a while before we get him. Brings to mind a nice word that starts with a j and a u.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.