Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Bill] Clinton cautions Democrats [but his wife and Howard Dean see it differently]
July 25, 2003 | James G. Lakely

Posted on 07/24/2003 10:19:15 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo

Former President Bill Clinton's advice that Democrats should quit harping on President Bush's disputed statement that Iraq had pursued nuclear material from Africa was well-received by many Democrats on Capitol Hill — but not his wife.

"Everybody makes mistakes when they are president," Mr. Clinton said Tuesday night on CNN's "Larry King Live," adding that "the thing we ought to be focused on is what is the right thing to do right now."

The comments were widely interpreted as a message to Democratic presidential candidates that their constant criticism of Mr. Bush's Iraq policy is pushing the party too far to the left and away from mainstream voters who still largely support the U.S.-led campaign that deposed Saddam Hussein.

"If I were them, I'd perk my ears up a little and listen," said Sen. Zell Miller, Georgia Democrat. "I think this is a man worth listening to. He won [the presidency] twice, after all."

Former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean, who has surged to front-runner status for the Democratic presidential nomination, hasn't taken that advice. Asked Tuesday about his reaction to U.S. troops killing Saddam's two brutal sons, Uday and Qusai, in an attack in Mosul, Iraq, Mr. Dean dismissed the achievement.

"The ends do not justify the means," he said as he issued a flurry of critical comments about the president's justification for the war and about those who supported it.

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, New York Democrat, also didn't seem to be on the same page as her husband. She repeated her call yesterday for an investigation into the Iraq-Africa nuclear link.

"I think there should be an independent investigation," Mrs. Clinton said. "I've called for it. How credible are these claims? What else do we need to find out about other claims?"

Sen. John B. Breaux, Louisiana Democrat said, however, that too much is being made about the assertion in Mr. Bush's State of the Union address that the "British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa."

"We didn't go to war because they were buying uranium from Africa," said Mr. Breaux, who had voted to authorize Mr. Bush to take military action in Iraq. "The information was incorrect. Does that make Saddam a good guy? No."

Rep. Harold E. Ford Jr., a Tennessee Democrat and a staunch supporter of the war, said he agrees with Mr. Clinton's call for political moderation.

Mr. Clinton "knows a thing or two about the game," Mr. Ford said. "I hope they tone down their rhetoric. The administration has answered the uranium question. What the American people care about is, what we are going to do in Iraq."

Rep. Jim Turner, Texas Democrat, said Mr. Clinton's comments were a message to the nine Democratic presidential hopefuls that bashing Mr. Bush on the war could create the impression that the party is weak and short-sighted with regard to defense and national-security issues.

"That's the wrong message," Mr. Turner said. "The Democratic Party clearly has difficulty discussing this issue because they are perceived as not being as strong on national security as the Republican Party. That's just not true."

To secure wide appeal, Mr. Turner said, Democrats have to be seen as part of "a united front in rebuilding Iraq and bringing freedom and democracy to Iraq."

"The question is not what didn't happen, or what was said in the past, but what should happen next," he said.

Mr. Turner, who serves on the House Armed Services Committee, also did not share Mr. Dean's views on the deaths of Saddam's sons.

"The stability of Iraq and the movement toward democracy hinges on getting rid of Saddam and his two sons," Mr. Turner said.

Mr. Clinton also warned on "Larry King Live" about leaving the impression that Democrats are hoping for Iraq to fall into chaos.

"We should be pulling for America on this. We should be pulling for the people of Iraq," he said.

Rep. Charles W. Stenholm, Texas Democrat, said Mr. Clinton's comments were "right on target."

"I don't think anyone is rooting against America, but that could be the perception," Mr. Stenholm said, adding that it's a "fair assessment" that the Democratic presidential contenders are drifting leftward.

"The enthusiasm that the candidates have for exciting the left, we can't have that if we want to win elections," Mr. Stenholm said.

Sen. Ben Nelson, Nebraska Democrat, said it's possible to criticize Mr. Bush without being labeled "unpatriotic," but agreed that the presidential contenders are moving out of the political mainstream.

"I thought [Mr. Clinton] was saying, 'Use some caution and don't drift too far to the left, because that is not an area that will win elections,' " Mr. Nelson said.

Rep. Rahm Emanuel, Illinois Democrat and former top aide to Mr. Clinton, credited him for being "generous and supportive" to the current commander in chief.

"Only presidents know about the lonely decision to go to war," Mr. Emanuel said, adding that Democrats can still effectively criticize the president on developments in the aftermath of the war.

Mr. Emanuel pointed out that the Clinton administration had led the attack to secure peace in Bosnia, "but not a single soldier was killed when the fighting was over."

"Now we've got soldiers dying over there every day," Mr. Emanuel said.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2004; jamesglakely; x42
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 07/24/2003 10:19:16 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
Washington Times link to story
2 posted on 07/24/2003 10:22:14 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All; Mia T; sarcasm; Miss Marple

3 posted on 07/24/2003 10:28:46 PM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
I posted earlier that I believe that Clinton set up the other Democrats that are running in '04 by sending McAuliffe out with the STOU talking points and then waiting until all the candidates made complete fools of themselves to make his statements. He also sent the DLC out with an article in the WSJ last week, decrying the takeover of the party by the extreme left wing, saying that it would undo all the centrist gains that Clinton had made. I believe that Clinton is clearing the deck for Hillary to run as a centrist.
4 posted on 07/24/2003 10:29:35 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
"Rep. Jim Turner, Texas Democrat, said Mr. Clinton's comments were a message to the nine Democratic presidential hopefuls that bashing Mr. Bush on the war could create the impression that the party is weak and short-sighted with regard to defense and national-security issues.

"That's the wrong message," Mr. Turner said.

No, that's exactly the right message, Mr. Turner.

5 posted on 07/24/2003 10:31:42 PM PDT by Neanderthal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
Bill Clinton made mistakes. He made one mistake that weighed two hundred and twenty pounds.
6 posted on 07/24/2003 10:34:13 PM PDT by oyez (It only takes a minute to write a letter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oyez
Yeah, I saw that joke on Leno tonight too...
7 posted on 07/24/2003 10:35:00 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, New York Democrat, also didn't seem to be on the same page as her husband. She repeated her call yesterday for an investigation into the Iraq-Africa nuclear link.

Gee Mrs. Clinton .. do you really want to do that.

Seems, your co-president hubby thought Saddam had a nuke program also.

State of the Union 1998

Saddam Hussein has spent the better part of this decade, and much of his nation’s wealth, not on providing for the Iraqi people but on developing nuclear, chemical and biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them. The United Nations weapons inspectors have done a truly remarkable job, finding and destroying more of Iraq’s arsenal than was destroyed during the entire Gulf War. Now, Saddam Hussein wants to stop them from completing their mission. I know I speak for everyone in this chamber, Republicans and Democrats, when I say to Saddam Hussein, you cannot defy the will of the world. And when I say to him, you have used weapons of mass destruction before.We are determined to deny you the capacity to use them again.

What did he know and when did he know it?

8 posted on 07/24/2003 10:36:43 PM PDT by Mo1 (Please help Free Republic and Donate Now !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
Any staement by Clinton that appears to support or feign understanding for President Bush; can only be powder for the DNC.

Clinton believes in nothing but himself and how he can get back in the White House.

The man is a perjury and clearly insane.

9 posted on 07/24/2003 11:00:11 PM PDT by highpockets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: highpockets
perjury = perjurer
10 posted on 07/24/2003 11:02:57 PM PDT by highpockets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
From the article~~"The comments were widely interpreted as a message to Democratic presidential candidates that their constant criticism of Mr. Bush's Iraq policy is pushing the party too far to the left..."

Nah. I smell legacy building. That "9/11 Report" must point more than one finger in Clinton's direction. (If the media ever reports it.)

11 posted on 07/25/2003 4:15:55 AM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
"I think there should be an independent investigation," Mrs. Clinton said. "I've called for it. How credible are these claims?

Well, the claim was, Mrs. Clinton, that British intelligence has learned that Saddam recently sought nuclear material from Africa. Since the speech the British have publicly stood by their statement.

Investigation complete.

12 posted on 07/25/2003 4:22:51 AM PDT by wayoverontheright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eva
Absolutely right on with your comments.

Everything these people do is calculated, and purely selfish.

I also agree with Rush that no matter when Hellary decides to run, the negative factor is going to send her into a tailspin.

I also wonder whether the Dem Party will split with the Clintons trying to run the show. There has got to be alot of ticked off people right about now.

13 posted on 07/25/2003 4:23:55 AM PDT by Northern Yankee (Freedom.... needs a soldier !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
"That's the wrong message," Mr. Turner said. "The Democratic Party clearly has difficulty discussing this issue because they are perceived as not being as strong on national security as the Republican Party. That's just not true."

I love reading democrats, they are just sooooo delusional

14 posted on 07/25/2003 6:55:53 AM PDT by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Northern Yankee
The rest of the DNC seems to be oblivious to what the Clintons are doing. They go right on blathering about the WMD and the one sentence in the STOU, they even put out that horrible, misleading ad after Clinton made his statements. I don't get it. Either they are all stupid or its all a part of the plan.
15 posted on 07/25/2003 8:37:10 AM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Eva
I agree. The Dem base, as rabid as has it has been for more left wing representation, would still vote for Hillary even if she ran on the GOP platform!
16 posted on 07/25/2003 8:41:51 AM PDT by amused (Republicans for Sharpton!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: amused
I just can't believe that the '04 candidates don't feel betrayed by Terry McAuliffe. He's Clinton's man and yet he led them in the direction of opposition to the Iraq war and
questioning the WMDs. He helped them make complete foos of themselves and now Clinton is finally making public statements that are supporting the Bush administration. They should be irate at this betrayal.
17 posted on 07/25/2003 8:55:01 AM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Eva
I just can't believe that the '04 candidates don't feel betrayed by Terry McAuliffe. He's Clinton's man and yet he led them in the direction of opposition to the Iraq war and questioning the WMDs. He helped them make complete foos of themselves and now Clinton is finally making public statements that are supporting the Bush administration. They should be irate at this betrayal.

The candidates can't get in a pissing match with Saint Clinton. But the base absolutely HATES the DLC even if they still love Clinton.

18 posted on 07/25/2003 9:10:22 AM PDT by amused (Republicans for Sharpton!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
Bill's legasssee will not survive a real investigation into his corruptions of the various law enforcement and intelligence agencies. XXX-42 is trying to call off the dogs, but the loosed are the dogs of war. They are marking Bill's leg.

Bill and Hillary's one successful military assault was at Mt. Carmel, Waco, Texas. That exercise in overwhelming force only lasted 51 days, however it is still remembered all too well today.

The Monica misdirect cruise missle shoot off is only one waste of assets. His justification along with the Dem's letter of encouragement nails both XXX-42 and his Congressional coprophages. Even the "aspirin factory" proved to be based on "bad intel".

Hillary may throw more - tantrums, lamps, ashtrays, and books before her dream as America's "Mommy Dearest Leader" is satisfied. Her hotflashes of political genius should make women and men pause.

19 posted on 07/25/2003 9:34:09 AM PDT by SevenDaysInMay (Federal judges and justices serve for periods of good behavior, not life. Article III sec. 1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eva
"Clinton is clearing the deck for Hillary to run as a centrist. "

Perhaps, but Hillary doesn't seem to be cooperating. She's can't resist getting on the liberal bandwaggon. He can set them up all he wants, but if he can't get Hillary to reign in her true self, she will never be perceived as a centrist. Thank goodness.

20 posted on 07/25/2003 9:43:45 AM PDT by DannyTN (Note left on my door by a pack of neighborhood dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson