Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

To Show Loyalty, Rice Lies for Bush
New York Observer ^ | Joe Conason

Posted on 07/18/2003 5:42:51 AM PDT by conservative forever

According to contemporary political lore, the Bush clan exalts loyalty above every other virtue. Other politicians envy that inviolable code, whose power is reflected in the absence of leaks from the White House, in the lockstep obedience of politicians in Congress and around the country, and in the enormous cash donations from hundreds of wealthy "friends." This is how dynasties are built to endure.

But at the highest level, in the inner councils, such feudal allegiances often require awful sacrifice and compromise. For those who now work for George W. Bush, loyalty means surrendering professional integrity and accepting public humiliation. Loyalty means uttering words and phrases that nobody can believe. Loyalty means misleading the people and the press about the gravest matters of state.

Loyalty means lying.

Consider the poignant case of Condoleezza Rice, who entered this administration as a respected academic expert on Russian affairs and the former provost of Stanford University. Unlike some of the figures around the President, Dr. Rice had no serious blots on her reputation when she was appointed national security advisor. From a family that suffered the indignities and deprivations of segregated Alabama, she has long been admired as an African-American woman who rose by dint of personal effort and scholarly ability as well as affirmative action. The list of honors, degrees, directorships and other achievements on her official résumé is extraordinary.

After serving in the first Bush White House on the National Security Council, and then a stint in the 2000 campaign as a discreet adviser on foreign affairs, she had come to be regarded by the political clan as among its most reliable members. Sometimes she almost appeared to have been adopted by the President and his family.

But during the past two years of international crisis, Dr. Rice has been dispatched to prevaricate repeatedly in defense of her boss. She was caught spreading a false story about Sept. 11, claiming that Air Force One flew the President to Oklahoma after the attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon because "intelligence" indicated that terrorists were aiming for the White House and the Presidential jet. Later she testified that the U.S. government had never anticipated an assault by airliner, when in fact there had been many warnings of exactly such tactics—most notably during the summer of 2001, when Western intelligence services set up anti-aircraft batteries around the Genoa summit to protect the President.

Memories are short in this country, so Dr. Rice escaped those embarrassing incidents with her reputation more or less intact. Then last year, as the determination of the White House to wage war on Iraq became plain, she began to promote dubious stories about Saddam Hussein’s regime. As national security advisor, she had access to all of the sensitive intelligence about Iraq, so the press and Congress took her pronouncements seriously.

More than anyone other than the President himself, Dr. Rice stoked fears about a "mushroom cloud" rising over an American city unless the U.S. waged war on Iraq. To promote such dread, she warned that a shipment of aluminum tubes purchased by the Iraqis could only be intended for a uranium-enrichment device. Long after the International Atomic Energy Authority debunked that claim, the national security advisor continued to insist that it must be true.

Still, she had gotten away with those whoppers as well, thanks to the complaisant national press corps. Lately, however, she has engaged in deceptions that are too obvious and too simple to ignore. Not only is she responsible for the false allegation about Niger uranium in the State of the Union address, but she dishonorably forced C.I.A. director George Tenet to say that was his fault rather than hers.

Dr. Rice knew that the C.I.A. had questioned the veracity of the Niger uranium tale. She knew because Mr. Tenet had warned her deputy, Stephen Hadley, of its dubious quality three months earlier. Yet she permitted that sentence to be uttered by the President. Now she tells us that those 16 words were "accurate" because the information was attributed to British intelligence. She wants us to believe that until last month she had never heard about the mission to Niger undertaken by former Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV, who reported back to the C.I.A. and the State Department that the Niger uranium story was a fake.

But neither she nor the President, nor anyone else in authority, ever cared whether that story was true. It merely served a purpose, like the "aluminum tubes" allegation, and the assertion that Saddam was assisting Al Qaeda, and the other prewar "intelligence" myths designed to excite belligerence and undermine the U.N. inspection process.

Dr. Rice played her role in that campaign with consummate loyalty indeed. She continues to do so, and in the process she has damaged herself permanently for an unscrupulous family of politicians. I hope they’re grateful.

You may reach Joe Conason via email at: jconason@observer.com.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: algorelostgetoverit; cheeseandwhine; clymer; dairyproducts; deadtrollposting; dirtyunderwear; du; dusrupter; isthatyoujoe; kittenchow; liberalpansy; looser; newbie; offhismeds; phakeconservative; pufromdu; rat; rattricks; strikeupthebanned; thisaccountisbanned; vikingkitties; waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa; weareyouroverlords; zot; zotalicious; zotorama; zotzarella; zotzilla; zotzinger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

1 posted on 07/18/2003 5:42:51 AM PDT by conservative forever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: conservative forever
Is there extant a commentator more noisome and odious than Joe Conason?
2 posted on 07/18/2003 5:45:48 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest (Hey, You Never Know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
noi·some ( P ) Pronunciation Key (noism)
adj.

Offensive to the point of arousing disgust; foul: a noisome odor.
3 posted on 07/18/2003 5:46:54 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: conservative forever

ZOT!
4 posted on 07/18/2003 5:46:58 AM PDT by SquirrelKing ("A liberal is a man too broadminded to take his own side in a quarrel." - Robert Frost)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Let's keep the Dem's on the run!
Click the Pic!

5 posted on 07/18/2003 5:47:01 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Short answer: no.
6 posted on 07/18/2003 5:47:19 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SquirrelKing
Excellent! I had not thought to check sign-up date.
7 posted on 07/18/2003 5:48:21 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: conservative forever
Nice try with the screen name choice, but we've got your number.
8 posted on 07/18/2003 5:48:36 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative forever
"I come from the land of the ice and snow........."
9 posted on 07/18/2003 5:48:40 AM PDT by Skooz (Tagline removed by moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
I'd have to say no. Mark Morford is simply a lunatic. Michael Moore is a sideshow. Maureen Dowd is just a sad old lady.

But Joe Conason is a vicious character assassin who lies in order to further a very specific agenda.

10 posted on 07/18/2003 5:48:57 AM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day; Poohbah; BlueLancer; hellinahandcart; jriemer; Zavien Doombringer

11 posted on 07/18/2003 5:49:25 AM PDT by dighton (NLC™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative forever
Thanks for joining up today; I love it when someone signs up to post a hit piece for their first post.

Let the games begin.
12 posted on 07/18/2003 5:49:39 AM PDT by MattMa (I'm not a victim, I am a conservative and if you get to close, I just may bite.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative forever; dighton; Zavien Doombringer; jriemer; 4mycountry; TheBigB

ZOT!!

13 posted on 07/18/2003 5:49:57 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Excellent! I had not thought to check sign-up date.

Hey, I calls 'em like I sees 'em.

14 posted on 07/18/2003 5:50:14 AM PDT by SquirrelKing ("A liberal is a man too broadminded to take his own side in a quarrel." - Robert Frost)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: conservative forever; dighton
Another fiendishly clever disguise!
15 posted on 07/18/2003 5:50:16 AM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative forever
Dr. Rice knew that the C.I.A. had questioned the veracity of the Niger uranium tale. She knew because Mr. Tenet had warned her deputy, Stephen Hadley, of its dubious quality three months earlier. Yet she permitted that sentence to be uttered by the President.

Hey Joe, do you even care to find out what the sentence was Bush stated in the SOTU? I doubt it, since you're such a lying leftist, BS'r yourself!

/anger

16 posted on 07/18/2003 5:50:52 AM PDT by sirchtruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dighton
That wouldn't be the third rail, would it?
17 posted on 07/18/2003 5:51:40 AM PDT by kakkatekoi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: conservative forever
Is this her? Is this the Liar?

National Security Chief.......

Obligatory Photo

Yep, that's her. Eat your heart out you semi-competant liberals.

18 posted on 07/18/2003 5:51:41 AM PDT by bert (Don't Panic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative forever
I don't believe Rice would lie for her mother, father or the Virgin Mary.

She's polticially savy enough to emphasize part of reality over various unmentioned parts for reasonable benefit.

I don't consider that lying depending on the limits involved.
19 posted on 07/18/2003 5:52:08 AM PDT by Quix (PLEASE SHARE THE TRUTH RE BILLDO AND SHRILLERY FAR AND WIDE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart
Another fiendishly clever disguise!

LOL. He'll probably reappear with the screen name "notaDUmember"

20 posted on 07/18/2003 5:52:28 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson