Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary's Plans to Take the White House
Conservative Book Service ^ | 12 July 2003 | Conservative Book Service Email

Posted on 07/12/2003 9:39:11 PM PDT by PhiKapMom

Today's CONSERVATIVE ALERT is a special message for xxxxxx xxxxxxx from Conservative Book Service:

Hillary's Plans to Take the White House

Your worst fears may be about to come true. Hillary's Scheme: Inside the Next Clinton's Ruthless Agenda to Take the White House exposes the Clintons' long-range, highly detailed plan to make Hillary President of the United States -- and yes, despite her official denials, she's still mulling over a run in 2004.

In shocking detail, investigative journalist Carl Limbacher here blows the lid off the New York senator's plans for a grand political coup, something she has been carefully and quietly plotting for more than 20 years. With a patience, doggedness, and thirst for the truth that few reporters have displayed, Limbacher got the full story of Hillary's plans by conducting extensive research into Hillary's past and securing exclusive interviews with Clinton insiders. He even questioned Hillary herself! Limbacher uncovers the juicy morsels, backroom deals, and insider wrangling surrounding Hillary's presidential ambitions -- the hidden details that the mainstream press is too intimidated by (or enamored of) the Clintons to tell you about.

Think that Hillary doesn't stand a chance to become President? Limbacher shows how they'll get around potential and real scandals of a magnitude that ended the careers of many politicians less resourceful and ruthless than they are. He explains how the Clintons' approach to issues that could derail their plans -- such as Whitewater and Bill's thirst for bimbos -- has been consistently characterized by a brazen disregard for the rule of law and even for common decency. With startling precision, Limbacher also draws parallels between today's political environment and that which existed in 1992 -- the year George H. W. Bush lost the race to an upstart governor from Arkansas.

Limbacher reveals the real answers to questions Hillary avoids in public -- and much more, including:

• Why Hillary is not likely to wait until 2008 to enter the race for President

• How Hillary torpedoed Al Gore's chances for a rematch with President Bush

• The Clintons: why they're the most calculating and cold-blooded political team America has seen since John and Robert Kennedy

• Compelling evidence that Hillary has accepted money from Muslim groups with open sympathy for terrorists

• The eleventh-hour dirty tricks machine that beat Bush the father in 1992 and almost beat Bush the son in 2000 -- a machine that Hillary is ready to use again when she runs

• Conclusive evidence of bribery in the last-minute pardon frenzy just before Bill Clinton left office

• Remember the furor over Hillary's calling an aide a "Jew b-----d"? It wasn't the only time she has indulged in vicious slurs

• How the Clintons have effectively silenced publicity about Bill's philandering (including details about the stash of explosives discovered in a Clinton security agent's car)

You don't even have to be a member of the "vast right-wing conspiracy" to be concerned about what Hillary in the White House would mean for the presidency, the Constitution, and America as we know it. Get all the facts that she and the media don't want you to know in Hillary's Scheme.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; bookreview; carllimbacher; clinton; crime; elections; exposed; family; hillarysscheme
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440441-460461-480 ... 521-528 next last
To: PhiKapMom
Hillary doesnt need any plans according to a growing number of FR posters, she has their vote, "Just to show Bush!"
441 posted on 07/14/2003 12:25:51 PM PDT by cardinal4 (The Senate Armed Services Comm; the Chinese pipeline into US secrets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I'm sorry, but I find it VERY hard to believe that Hillary would give Carl the time of day.

Why he would add this hype is beyond me,it is beyond belief and unneeded to give credence to his article! I see you read Louis Gonzalez's column. In Calif. adios is used by almost everyone, after reading his column I will never again use it irreverently.(reading El Yuco's story kinda puts things in perspective don't you think?)

442 posted on 07/14/2003 12:33:58 PM PDT by woodyinscc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 435 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
The attacks going on right now against the President are the MO of the black crusty pantsuit.

I couldn't agree with you more. Last night I was doing some research about the Rockefeller Family and the Standard Oil leases off of Vietnam that were pretty suspect. While searching, I found an interesting item. Seems the word socialist has been used to describe communist for years. The article stated the USSR didn't stand for the United Soviet Communist Republic but stood for United Soviet Socialist Republic. It just jumped out at me knowing so many members of Congress belong to the Socialist Party here in the United States. I also found this article which says it all about today's Clinton DemocRAT Party. I had never read this before:

January 28, 2003 -- Michael P. Tremoglie: Tale of Two Parties

I am a registered independent and have been for years. There was a time that I registered as a Republican. However, a Republican in Philadelphia-which has not had a Republican mayor in fifty years-is akin to an independent. My vote is usually split among Republicans, Democrats, and Independents. I voted twice for Ed Rendell as mayor of Philadelphia. I was going to vote for him for governor of Pennsylvania.

Then I watched part of the “memorial service” from Minneapolis.

Now I realize there are cultural differences in every part of the country. However, I do not believe-and the comments of Governor Ventura confirmed this-that what I watched on TV was a Midwest thing. Besides, I once lived in Chicago and I do not recall “memorial services” such as that one. Booing guests at a memorial service, people who came to give their condolences, is considered gauche even in Chicago.

Apparently, it is not considered gauche by Democrats.

These are, after all, the same Democrats who booed and harassed an Albany PD honor guard at Hillary Clinton’s nominating convention. They were called “Giuliani’s Gestapo” which not only slandered the guard; it was a veiled slander of Giuliani’s Italian heritage as well.

These are, after all, the same Democrats who booed Boy Scouts at the Democratic National Convention in Los Angeles.

This is not your father’s Democratic Party. It is the Democratic Party of the Communist Party USA (CP-USA). Unless anyone doubt the involvement of the CP-USA with the Democrats, read this excerpt from a 1996 edition of the International Workers Bulletin:

“Gus Hall backs Clinton-Gore

Not surprisingly, the most fervent support for Clinton and the Democratic Party comes from the remnants of the old-line Stalinists in the Communist Party USA. Not only are Gus Hall & Co. backing Clinton, but they are denouncing any independent or third party campaign which threatens to damage Clinton's reelection prospects.”

The CP-USA ceased running candidates for president in 1988 and preferred to work within the Democratic Party, beginning with their support for Jesse Jackson. However, it is not only the CP-USA that is involved with the Democratic Party, the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) have been very active as well.

The DSA advertised on their website that they are sponsors of the Congressional Democrat’s House Progressive Caucus (HPC). Congressmen Ron Dellums and Bernie Sanders formed the HPC in 1992. Dellums and Sanders (and Rep. Major Owens of New York) are DSA members. Dellums was a Vice Chair of the DSA. The HPC includes such Congressional luminaries as Maxine Waters, Fortney “Pete” Stark, Cynthia McKinney, and the “Baghdad Boys” Representatives McDermott and Bonior.

The DSA, according to their website, is the principal U.S. affiliate of the Socialist Internationale which is a worldwide organization of socialist parties. Members of the Socialist Internationale include the Sandinista National Liberation Front.

This link between the Sandinista Liberation Front and Democrats in the House of Representatives explains much of what was occurring during the Iran-Contra hearings. This would explain why House Democrats passed legislation prohibiting aid to the Nicaraguan anti-communist Contra’s. One can only speculate how much this relationship, between some Democratic Party members of the United States House of Representatives and the Sandinista Liberation Front, influenced United States foreign policy in Central America.

Media types say that Republicans are equally culpable. Really? There are no links of which I am aware between Republican members of Congress and, say, a militia group or a Neo-Fascist group. There have not been any claims by Republicans, of which I am aware, that Democrats intend to starve Americans, bankrupt them, or burn their churches.

Republicans criticize Democrats they do not demonize them. What Democrats do is tantamount to Republicans claiming Democrats favor gun control because they want citizens to be murdered.

The current Democratic Party has more in common with Madame Defarge, than it does with Thomas Jefferson. I once heard Representative Chakka Fattah say to a Republican colleague, during a congressional hearing, that the Republicans would like to exterminate Democrats. The irony of Fattahs comment was that the opposite seemed to be true.

No, this is not your father’s Democratic Party and it is not the Democratic Party for which I voted. These Democrats are more ochlocratic than democratic.

The “memorial service” was emblematic of this.

###

Frank Salvato fsalvato@attbi.com

443 posted on 07/14/2003 2:02:57 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (Bush Cheney '04 - VICTORY IN '04 -- $4 for '04 - www.GeorgeWBush.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Thanks for the Fidel/Rather photo!

Fox News just showed President Bush discussiong the Iraq/Niger deal and now showing what all the RATs are saying. Just turned them off again. Not too impressed with James Rosen BTW or John Gibson. They are still pushing this crap!

Here is the question of the day on Gibson: Will the President face a credibilty gap in 2004!

Ed Gillespie, RNC, is now talking. Just took out Gephardt. The RATs have no policy to do with this. This is a distraction because they have no policy.

Not impressed with Gibson and his pushing the RAT talking points! Gillespie doing a fantastic job. Goal was regime change in Iraq! To Gibson: You should be asking the DemocRATs what they are for in how they would deal with a situation likes this. Also said that some RATs changed their position from for the regime change to against AFTER the war! Gillespie said that a lot of the candidates have moved Dean's way. We don't know what their security policy is!

I love Gillespie! He is standing up strong for America and for the President and against the RATs. RATs have no policy -- just cross their fingers and hope for the best.

According to Gillespie Dean has come pretty close to saying that we would be better off if Saddam is still there. He is saying if you take those 16 words out of the State of the Union does that mean that you shouldn't have taken out Saddam.

Now Gibson discussing NAACP Convention and how important it is to RATs.

444 posted on 07/14/2003 2:11:12 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (Bush Cheney '04 - VICTORY IN '04 -- $4 for '04 - www.GeorgeWBush.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 408 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4
That's true! They want to teach President Bush and the rest of us a lesson. However, IMHO NO conservative would vote for Hillary because if they did, then they are NOT conservative!
445 posted on 07/14/2003 2:12:39 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (Bush Cheney '04 - VICTORY IN '04 -- $4 for '04 - www.GeorgeWBush.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 441 | View Replies]

To: Marysecretary
I am one of those broken glass Republicans that absolutely nothing will keep me from voting and I no longer consider voting anything but a straight Republican ticket. I used to consider other candidates locally -- didn't vote for them but I did consider them. Now if there is not an (R) behind their name, they don't get my vote. I won't even vote for a RAT if no one else is running -- I leave it blank!
446 posted on 07/14/2003 2:15:57 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (Bush Cheney '04 - VICTORY IN '04 -- $4 for '04 - www.GeorgeWBush.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 431 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
The Klintoons will retake the White House using every dishonest, illegal device they can. I'm sure there are some scenarios they have up their sleeve that no one else has thought of yet. DO NOT dismiss them. Hildebeast is the modern version of Stalin.
447 posted on 07/14/2003 2:28:55 PM PDT by proudofthesouth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Bush Bashers are out in full force tonight on FR!

Noting what he does as opposed to what conservative prinicples espouse is "bashing"? I didn't realize his ego was so delicate.

448 posted on 07/14/2003 2:46:08 PM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
I am one of those broken glass Republicans that absolutely nothing will keep me from voting and I no longer consider voting anything but a straight Republican ticket. I used to consider other candidates locally -- didn't vote for them but I did consider them. Now if there is not an (R) behind their name, they don't get my vote. I won't even vote for a RAT if no one else is running -- I leave it blank!

Which gives us Republicans like Jeffords, Chaffee, Specter, Snowe, McCain, et al. Great.

It is fascinating that you are obviously proud that you've eliminated every element of critical thinking skills from the most important public act that you participate in.

449 posted on 07/14/2003 2:50:50 PM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 446 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
No big surprises to me.

Have colored them exceedingly evil and demonic for a long time.

450 posted on 07/14/2003 2:54:18 PM PDT by Quix (LIVE THREAD NOW STARTED. UFO special Tues eve & share opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Support Free Republic
Love it.
451 posted on 07/14/2003 2:55:29 PM PDT by Quix (LIVE THREAD NOW STARTED. UFO special Tues eve & share opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317; Howlin
You don't think calling President Bush a "socialist" is bashing? Or any other names? Or how about lying about him? Not to mention what the rest of us are called because we support him. You see the women on here that support Pres Bush are not smart enough to know better according to the Bashers. We are "stupid" just like they call the President! We are far from stupid if you haven't noticed.

If you want to Bash the President go ahead -- but the Bush supporters will counter right back! We are not going to take the bashing lying down and have gone on the offensive!

And I am really tired of seeing conservative principles thrown around here like the far right has the only answers. The rest of us cannot be "true" conservatives unless we threaten to stay home and not vote if President Bush doesn't do everything we want him to do according to some. I have news for you 96% of Republican conservatives support President Bush so I have a feeling there are a lot like me that will do everything we can to see him elected!
452 posted on 07/14/2003 2:58:27 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (Bush Cheney '04 - VICTORY IN '04 -- $4 for '04 - www.GeorgeWBush.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 448 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
I still say she and the puppet masters behind her are exceedingly evil and exceedingly dangerous.
453 posted on 07/14/2003 3:00:58 PM PDT by Quix (LIVE THREAD NOW STARTED. UFO special Tues eve & share opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
MUCH AGREE WITH YOU.
454 posted on 07/14/2003 3:01:43 PM PDT by Quix (LIVE THREAD NOW STARTED. UFO special Tues eve & share opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
The so-called conservative movement of the last 20 years, starting with the Reagan revolution of the 1980s, followed by the 1994 Gingrich takeover of the House, and culminating in the early 2000s with Republican control of both Congress and the White House, seems a terrible failure today.

Republicans have failed utterly to shrink the size of government; instead it is bigger and costlier than ever before. Federal spending spirals out of control, new Great Society social welfare programs have been created, and the national debt is rising by more than a half-trillion dollars per year. Whatever happened to the conservative vision supposedly sweeping the nation?

One thing is certain: those who worked and voted for less government, the very foot soldiers in the conservative revolution, have been deceived. Today, the ideal of limited government has been abandoned by the GOP, and real conservatives find their views no longer matter.

Those aren't my words. They are Ron Paul's. So...are you a 'real' Conservative?

455 posted on 07/14/2003 3:02:44 PM PDT by ModernDayCato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 452 | View Replies]

To: potlatch
Scary isn't the word!! Terrifying! Some people laugh at our fears, but we wouldn't put anything past them. Every bad thing about Hillary needs to be broadcast over and over, because the general population isn't even aware of it !


ABSOLUTELY!

ABSOLUTELY!!!

ABSOLUTELY!!!!!!!
456 posted on 07/14/2003 3:02:59 PM PDT by Quix (LIVE THREAD NOW STARTED. UFO special Tues eve & share opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
You really don't get it! I don't live in New England, I gave you Senators Nickles and Inhofe!

The Republican Party is not listed as the Conservative Party if you haven't noticed! I am a Republican, always have been, and I will not vote for 3rd Party types or Indy's who spoil elections because the person running is not Conservative enough for the ultra right.

I got news for you, Snowe and Collins are the type of Republicans that win in Maine that gives us two additional seats in the Senate. They vote more conservative then 99% of the RATs so I have no problem. You see I think our Party is better off to have divergent views and not be little robots. There are some conservative principles touted on here that I don't agree with -- one of those is staying home if the Republican doesn't do what some people want. That is self-defeating.

I will take a Lincoln Chaffee even though I don't agree with him because when the chips are down and we really need that vote, he will be there 99% of the time. All the Republicans from the NE are voting with us on the Senate judicial nominations.

If I lived in New England, used to BTW, I would still vote for the Republican over any RAT. I want Republicans running that can win. The Party has already become more conservative over time and a lot more conservative than the RATs. It will continue to shift right, but you have to get out and get good conservative candidates at the lower levels first. Some of you want the leap overnight and it is not going to happen that way!



457 posted on 07/14/2003 3:05:35 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (Bush Cheney '04 - VICTORY IN '04 -- $4 for '04 - www.GeorgeWBush.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 449 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
It doesn't look like 96% on this thread.
458 posted on 07/14/2003 3:05:49 PM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 452 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
I think our Party is better off to have divergent views and not be little robots.

And yet you lament the divergent views on the President.

459 posted on 07/14/2003 3:06:53 PM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 457 | View Replies]

To: Quix
Wouldn't you like to know who is really pulling the strings behind the Clintons? I agree with you that there are very evil puppetmasters behind the Clintons! Just who, I am not sure!
460 posted on 07/14/2003 3:07:34 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (Bush Cheney '04 - VICTORY IN '04 -- $4 for '04 - www.GeorgeWBush.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 453 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440441-460461-480 ... 521-528 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson