Posted on 07/12/2003 9:39:11 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
Today's CONSERVATIVE ALERT is a special message for xxxxxx xxxxxxx from Conservative Book Service:
Hillary's Plans to Take the White House
Your worst fears may be about to come true. Hillary's Scheme: Inside the Next Clinton's Ruthless Agenda to Take the White House exposes the Clintons' long-range, highly detailed plan to make Hillary President of the United States -- and yes, despite her official denials, she's still mulling over a run in 2004.
In shocking detail, investigative journalist Carl Limbacher here blows the lid off the New York senator's plans for a grand political coup, something she has been carefully and quietly plotting for more than 20 years. With a patience, doggedness, and thirst for the truth that few reporters have displayed, Limbacher got the full story of Hillary's plans by conducting extensive research into Hillary's past and securing exclusive interviews with Clinton insiders. He even questioned Hillary herself! Limbacher uncovers the juicy morsels, backroom deals, and insider wrangling surrounding Hillary's presidential ambitions -- the hidden details that the mainstream press is too intimidated by (or enamored of) the Clintons to tell you about.
Think that Hillary doesn't stand a chance to become President? Limbacher shows how they'll get around potential and real scandals of a magnitude that ended the careers of many politicians less resourceful and ruthless than they are. He explains how the Clintons' approach to issues that could derail their plans -- such as Whitewater and Bill's thirst for bimbos -- has been consistently characterized by a brazen disregard for the rule of law and even for common decency. With startling precision, Limbacher also draws parallels between today's political environment and that which existed in 1992 -- the year George H. W. Bush lost the race to an upstart governor from Arkansas.
Limbacher reveals the real answers to questions Hillary avoids in public -- and much more, including:
Why Hillary is not likely to wait until 2008 to enter the race for President
How Hillary torpedoed Al Gore's chances for a rematch with President Bush
The Clintons: why they're the most calculating and cold-blooded political team America has seen since John and Robert Kennedy
Compelling evidence that Hillary has accepted money from Muslim groups with open sympathy for terrorists
The eleventh-hour dirty tricks machine that beat Bush the father in 1992 and almost beat Bush the son in 2000 -- a machine that Hillary is ready to use again when she runs
Conclusive evidence of bribery in the last-minute pardon frenzy just before Bill Clinton left office
Remember the furor over Hillary's calling an aide a "Jew b-----d"? It wasn't the only time she has indulged in vicious slurs
How the Clintons have effectively silenced publicity about Bill's philandering (including details about the stash of explosives discovered in a Clinton security agent's car)
You don't even have to be a member of the "vast right-wing conspiracy" to be concerned about what Hillary in the White House would mean for the presidency, the Constitution, and America as we know it. Get all the facts that she and the media don't want you to know in Hillary's Scheme.
Why he would add this hype is beyond me,it is beyond belief and unneeded to give credence to his article! I see you read Louis Gonzalez's column. In Calif. adios is used by almost everyone, after reading his column I will never again use it irreverently.(reading El Yuco's story kinda puts things in perspective don't you think?)
I couldn't agree with you more. Last night I was doing some research about the Rockefeller Family and the Standard Oil leases off of Vietnam that were pretty suspect. While searching, I found an interesting item. Seems the word socialist has been used to describe communist for years. The article stated the USSR didn't stand for the United Soviet Communist Republic but stood for United Soviet Socialist Republic. It just jumped out at me knowing so many members of Congress belong to the Socialist Party here in the United States. I also found this article which says it all about today's Clinton DemocRAT Party. I had never read this before:
January 28, 2003 -- Michael P. Tremoglie: Tale of Two Parties
I am a registered independent and have been for years. There was a time that I registered as a Republican. However, a Republican in Philadelphia-which has not had a Republican mayor in fifty years-is akin to an independent. My vote is usually split among Republicans, Democrats, and Independents. I voted twice for Ed Rendell as mayor of Philadelphia. I was going to vote for him for governor of Pennsylvania.
Then I watched part of the memorial service from Minneapolis.
Now I realize there are cultural differences in every part of the country. However, I do not believe-and the comments of Governor Ventura confirmed this-that what I watched on TV was a Midwest thing. Besides, I once lived in Chicago and I do not recall memorial services such as that one. Booing guests at a memorial service, people who came to give their condolences, is considered gauche even in Chicago.
Apparently, it is not considered gauche by Democrats.
These are, after all, the same Democrats who booed and harassed an Albany PD honor guard at Hillary Clintons nominating convention. They were called Giulianis Gestapo which not only slandered the guard; it was a veiled slander of Giulianis Italian heritage as well.
These are, after all, the same Democrats who booed Boy Scouts at the Democratic National Convention in Los Angeles.
This is not your fathers Democratic Party. It is the Democratic Party of the Communist Party USA (CP-USA). Unless anyone doubt the involvement of the CP-USA with the Democrats, read this excerpt from a 1996 edition of the International Workers Bulletin:
Gus Hall backs Clinton-Gore
Not surprisingly, the most fervent support for Clinton and the Democratic Party comes from the remnants of the old-line Stalinists in the Communist Party USA. Not only are Gus Hall & Co. backing Clinton, but they are denouncing any independent or third party campaign which threatens to damage Clinton's reelection prospects.
The CP-USA ceased running candidates for president in 1988 and preferred to work within the Democratic Party, beginning with their support for Jesse Jackson. However, it is not only the CP-USA that is involved with the Democratic Party, the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) have been very active as well.
The DSA advertised on their website that they are sponsors of the Congressional Democrats House Progressive Caucus (HPC). Congressmen Ron Dellums and Bernie Sanders formed the HPC in 1992. Dellums and Sanders (and Rep. Major Owens of New York) are DSA members. Dellums was a Vice Chair of the DSA. The HPC includes such Congressional luminaries as Maxine Waters, Fortney Pete Stark, Cynthia McKinney, and the Baghdad Boys Representatives McDermott and Bonior.
The DSA, according to their website, is the principal U.S. affiliate of the Socialist Internationale which is a worldwide organization of socialist parties. Members of the Socialist Internationale include the Sandinista National Liberation Front.
This link between the Sandinista Liberation Front and Democrats in the House of Representatives explains much of what was occurring during the Iran-Contra hearings. This would explain why House Democrats passed legislation prohibiting aid to the Nicaraguan anti-communist Contras. One can only speculate how much this relationship, between some Democratic Party members of the United States House of Representatives and the Sandinista Liberation Front, influenced United States foreign policy in Central America.
Media types say that Republicans are equally culpable. Really? There are no links of which I am aware between Republican members of Congress and, say, a militia group or a Neo-Fascist group. There have not been any claims by Republicans, of which I am aware, that Democrats intend to starve Americans, bankrupt them, or burn their churches.
Republicans criticize Democrats they do not demonize them. What Democrats do is tantamount to Republicans claiming Democrats favor gun control because they want citizens to be murdered.
The current Democratic Party has more in common with Madame Defarge, than it does with Thomas Jefferson. I once heard Representative Chakka Fattah say to a Republican colleague, during a congressional hearing, that the Republicans would like to exterminate Democrats. The irony of Fattahs comment was that the opposite seemed to be true.
No, this is not your fathers Democratic Party and it is not the Democratic Party for which I voted. These Democrats are more ochlocratic than democratic.
The memorial service was emblematic of this.
###
Frank Salvato fsalvato@attbi.com
Noting what he does as opposed to what conservative prinicples espouse is "bashing"? I didn't realize his ego was so delicate.
Which gives us Republicans like Jeffords, Chaffee, Specter, Snowe, McCain, et al. Great.
It is fascinating that you are obviously proud that you've eliminated every element of critical thinking skills from the most important public act that you participate in.
Republicans have failed utterly to shrink the size of government; instead it is bigger and costlier than ever before. Federal spending spirals out of control, new Great Society social welfare programs have been created, and the national debt is rising by more than a half-trillion dollars per year. Whatever happened to the conservative vision supposedly sweeping the nation?
One thing is certain: those who worked and voted for less government, the very foot soldiers in the conservative revolution, have been deceived. Today, the ideal of limited government has been abandoned by the GOP, and real conservatives find their views no longer matter.
Those aren't my words. They are Ron Paul's. So...are you a 'real' Conservative?
And yet you lament the divergent views on the President.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.