Skip to comments.
Hillary's Plans to Take the White House
Conservative Book Service ^
| 12 July 2003
| Conservative Book Service Email
Posted on 07/12/2003 9:39:11 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
Today's CONSERVATIVE ALERT is a special message for xxxxxx xxxxxxx from Conservative Book Service:
Hillary's Plans to Take the White House
Your worst fears may be about to come true. Hillary's Scheme: Inside the Next Clinton's Ruthless Agenda to Take the White House exposes the Clintons' long-range, highly detailed plan to make Hillary President of the United States -- and yes, despite her official denials, she's still mulling over a run in 2004.
In shocking detail, investigative journalist Carl Limbacher here blows the lid off the New York senator's plans for a grand political coup, something she has been carefully and quietly plotting for more than 20 years. With a patience, doggedness, and thirst for the truth that few reporters have displayed, Limbacher got the full story of Hillary's plans by conducting extensive research into Hillary's past and securing exclusive interviews with Clinton insiders. He even questioned Hillary herself! Limbacher uncovers the juicy morsels, backroom deals, and insider wrangling surrounding Hillary's presidential ambitions -- the hidden details that the mainstream press is too intimidated by (or enamored of) the Clintons to tell you about.
Think that Hillary doesn't stand a chance to become President? Limbacher shows how they'll get around potential and real scandals of a magnitude that ended the careers of many politicians less resourceful and ruthless than they are. He explains how the Clintons' approach to issues that could derail their plans -- such as Whitewater and Bill's thirst for bimbos -- has been consistently characterized by a brazen disregard for the rule of law and even for common decency. With startling precision, Limbacher also draws parallels between today's political environment and that which existed in 1992 -- the year George H. W. Bush lost the race to an upstart governor from Arkansas.
Limbacher reveals the real answers to questions Hillary avoids in public -- and much more, including:
Why Hillary is not likely to wait until 2008 to enter the race for President
How Hillary torpedoed Al Gore's chances for a rematch with President Bush
The Clintons: why they're the most calculating and cold-blooded political team America has seen since John and Robert Kennedy
Compelling evidence that Hillary has accepted money from Muslim groups with open sympathy for terrorists
The eleventh-hour dirty tricks machine that beat Bush the father in 1992 and almost beat Bush the son in 2000 -- a machine that Hillary is ready to use again when she runs
Conclusive evidence of bribery in the last-minute pardon frenzy just before Bill Clinton left office
Remember the furor over Hillary's calling an aide a "Jew b-----d"? It wasn't the only time she has indulged in vicious slurs
How the Clintons have effectively silenced publicity about Bill's philandering (including details about the stash of explosives discovered in a Clinton security agent's car)
You don't even have to be a member of the "vast right-wing conspiracy" to be concerned about what Hillary in the White House would mean for the presidency, the Constitution, and America as we know it. Get all the facts that she and the media don't want you to know in Hillary's Scheme.
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; bookreview; carllimbacher; clinton; crime; elections; exposed; family; hillarysscheme
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300, 301-320, 321-340 ... 521-528 next last
To: Budge; PeaceBeWithYou
Ping.
301
posted on
07/13/2003 7:00:18 AM PDT
by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
To: Mo1
"Don't underestimate this women .. it's to danagerous to do that" You got that right. Safer to give her too much credit than not enough, and with Hillary, "better safe than sorry" seems sound wisdom.
302
posted on
07/13/2003 7:02:53 AM PDT
by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
To: Mo1
"Laura in returned said that she liked Hellary's suit, it matched her eyes (she was wearing a red suit if I recall the story correctly)" ROTFL! Laura is a class act.
303
posted on
07/13/2003 7:07:03 AM PDT
by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
To: Lauratealeaf
"People can accept men when they are aging but women who age and in addition have the personality of a sharp piece of ice are not very acceptable." Well put. LOL! But then look at a lot of the women the RATs have put in office. Most look like they're possessed. You have to keep in mind that RATs are apparently blind to the oozing evil that animates these characters and makes them so ugly.
I hate it that you won't be able to FReep Hillary with us. I hope you will at least spread the word among people you know. We need to give her a suitable Arkansas "welcome". This will be a good opportunity to at least attempt to educate the sheeple a little bit as to what they're supporting.
304
posted on
07/13/2003 7:13:22 AM PDT
by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
To: WFTR
Here is how Hillary wins (many of you touched on these points)
1) She won the NY Senate seat without losing her temper and without having to deal with "the toughest journalists in the country".
2) Bush 41 had approval ratings like his son's 18 months before the election.
3) Hillary divorces or leaks another affair by Bill to gain her the "scorned wife" sympathy vote.
4) Naturally, many women and neutered men will vote for her just due to her sex.
5) A campaign against Bush 43 will be targeted at conservatives, criticizing Bush 43 for his Education Bill, Prescription Drug, Campaign Finance, etc. (He's a big spender) This will limit the conservative vote and cause many to stay home.
6) A 3rd party candidate will emerge to give those conservative voters another alternative. After all, Democrats and Republicans are all the same, right?
7) No terrorist attacks will cause the media to label Bush 43 as 'hysterical' on the issue every time he talks about it. Additional alerts will only make this worse. Hillary will praise Bush for the war on terror, but state that now we must move forward with the work of this country while continuing to track terrorists.
8) Regardless of economic conditions (we will never get back to the dot-com bubble), Hillary will state that the economy was better before Bush 43. People will forget the facts, regardless of Rush, Hannity, Freepers, etc. She will use Reagan's line "Are you better off now than you were four years ago?" Conservatives will scream and liberals will salivate.
9) Hillary will run a campaign for our future, the children and how we are destroying their world due to our own greed. She will appeal to the aging baby-boomers who are now realizing how selfish their lives have been and want to leave a legacy behind.
10) Finally, Hillary will win by focusing on the Supreme Court nominees from Bush 43 (there will be 1 or 2 by election time). Those nominees will be labeled as right-wingers that will take away your choices (abortion and who you have sex with). Hillary will paint all Republicans and dirty, old white men that want to stick their noses into your private lives while letting corporations like Enron screw you over.
THAT IS THE NIGHTMARE WE MUST BE PREPARED TO DEAL WITH.
I know the nation has changed a great deal since 9-11. However, we are already slipping back into our old habits.
Erik
To: Registered
"Satan would be running, who you try'n to kid?".
306
posted on
07/13/2003 7:17:16 AM PDT
by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
To: PhiKapMom
(Actual magazine cover."Hitlery, do you mind if we use der colors black unt red for your German magazine cover?" "NINE! DEY ARE MINE FAVORITE COLORS!)
307
posted on
07/13/2003 7:19:10 AM PDT
by
metalboy
(Liberals, what a dictator needs most.)
To: Brad's Gramma
"Along with talk radio, Free Republic would be right up on the list of things for this witch to take out" You could certainly count on her to try. Especially after she gets FReeped at every booksigning stop in the country. I have no doubt that we're way up on her hate list, as we are probably one of the biggest threats to her plans, if not the biggest, should she decide to run. Only the grace of God will protect anyone Hillary sets her sites on. She may be pretending to not be paying much attention to the FReepers that are everywhere she goes, but she's paying attention, and probably taking names. Bet on it.
308
posted on
07/13/2003 7:23:46 AM PDT
by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
To: Freedom4US
"In 'Living History' HILLARY tells her lies so convingly that the women readers will being them" =
...LINDA TRIPP, Hannity Radio Show
309
posted on
07/13/2003 7:23:58 AM PDT
by
ALOHA RONNIE
(Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 www.LZXRAY.comW)
To: PhiKapMom
We will defeat her because Republicans will stand united in not seeing another Clinton in the White House IMHO. Maybe, maybe not. This country withstood 8 years of Bill Clinton, it can withstand 8 years of Hillary. If President Bush keeps expanding government like a drunken DemocRAT and keeps sucking up to RATS then to hell with him.
To: Freedom4US
"I am coming out now to stop HILLARY from becoming President in 2004. Somebody's got to do it" =
...LINDA TRIPP, Hannity Radio Show
311
posted on
07/13/2003 7:25:46 AM PDT
by
ALOHA RONNIE
(Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 www.LZXRAY.comW)
To: arasina
Fear not it will never happen she has a greater risk of being a cell mate with Martha.
312
posted on
07/13/2003 7:30:10 AM PDT
by
Vaduz
To: Erik Latranyi
...No terrorist attacks will cause the media to label Bush 43 as 'hysterical' ...
Remember her bombing the Serbs on behalf of the Al Qaida backed Albanians. There will be or not be another terror attack as she sees fit.
Once she's in, look for the Capitol building to be bombed with everyone in it. Her allies are our worst enemies.
313
posted on
07/13/2003 7:36:58 AM PDT
by
the gillman@blacklagoon.com
(Never forget the millions in Chinese money in everyone's pockets. Ken Starr's too.)
To: longtermmemmory
"not to be confused with her homestate of Arkansas" Actually, HER home state is Illinois. She only came to Arkansas as a function of being married to Bill. She had to practice running things somewhere. Did a d*mn poor job of it here too. The poverty and education lack of education here is out of control and fully 1/3 of the population is on some type of government assistance and taxes are higher than anyplace I've ever seen and rising every few months on something. The RATs are still pretty much in control of this state. This is what she wants to bring the rest of the country.
314
posted on
07/13/2003 7:37:42 AM PDT
by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
To: goodnesswins
"Has Hillary ever REALLY pled a case to a jury? I have not heard of her doing that....she has done very LITTLE lawyer work" Her legal work has always been behind the scenes I believe, and necessarily so. She has no real people skills. I mean the woman won't, or can't, even answer a direct question. She has to prescreen everything that is said to her and she is a pathological paranoid. Not a good combination for a trial lawyer.
315
posted on
07/13/2003 7:40:32 AM PDT
by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
To: Mo1
"wouldn't he have to give up his citizenship to this country?" There are countries that allow dual citizenship. I'm not sure which do and which don't, but you can bet that neither of the Clintons does anything without it being part of a bigger scheme geared toward feathering their own nest.
316
posted on
07/13/2003 7:44:27 AM PDT
by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
To: MJY1288
We can not afford another Bill Clinton, if it means puting up with a republican President who caters to the middle to get re-elected I'm all for it just as long as he nominates conservatives to the Judiciary and impliments conservative policies for which has control of. George W. Bush is far more conservative than his father when it comes to foriegn policy, he is politically motivated on domestic issues, and must be in order to get re-elected. I feel as long as he is slowly changing the direction of the country while doing so, I'm all for it. Anything else will bring us another Bill Clinton at this time in our historyRight on. Some of the so called conservatives on this forum who are threatening to vote third party or for a dim, will be soleley responsible when Hillary or Kerry is elected. Then these so called conservatives will spend the duration of their tenure trashing them like they did Clinton. Oblivious to the fact that they put them in in the first place. It should also be noted that Ross Perot garnered some of Bushes votes. How many of the current whiners voted third party or not at all in 92, thus ushering in the Clinton era?
"Bush didnt do exactly what I and Rush wanted him to do so Im voting third party, Dim or not at all, that'll show Bush!" Sheesh. My 2 and 4 year old are more mature than that.
317
posted on
07/13/2003 7:50:45 AM PDT
by
cardinal4
(The Senate Armed Services Comm; the Chinese pipeline into US secrets)
To: Go Gordon
When is the last time a party allowed NINE candidates to fight it out. Think about it. With NINE candidates, there is no way there would be a concensus leader. Hence, they beckon the queen to save the party.One of the better speculative reasons I've heard for an '04 run. But I really think she'll wait for an '08 bid.
318
posted on
07/13/2003 7:51:03 AM PDT
by
BradyLS
To: PhiKapMom
"The thing I would like to know is WHO is behind the Clintons" Interesting question. I guess what you have to ask yourself is: "who benefits when they are in power?"
319
posted on
07/13/2003 7:52:22 AM PDT
by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
To: cardinal4
Right on. Some of the so called conservatives on this forum who are threatening to vote third party or for a dim, will be soleley responsible when Hillary or Kerry is elected.Ohhhhhhhhhh......so it will be their fault. What about those of us who will simply not vote? I suppose it will be our fault as well, eh?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300, 301-320, 321-340 ... 521-528 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson