Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Text of CIA Director Tenet's Statement
Associated Press ^ | 07-11-03

Posted on 07/11/2003 4:34:11 PM PDT by Brian S

Text of statement Friday night issued by CIA Director George Tenet:

__

Legitimate questions have arisen about how remarks on alleged Iraqi attempts to obtain uranium in Africa made it into the president's State of the Union speech. Let me be clear about several things right up front. First, CIA approved the president's State of the Union address before it was delivered. Second, I am responsible for the approval process in my agency. And third, the president had every reason to believe that the text presented to him was sound. These 16 words should never have been included in the text written for the president.

For perspective, a little history is in order.

There was fragmentary intelligence gathered in late 2001 and early 2002 on the allegations of Saddam's efforts to obtain additional raw uranium from Africa, beyond the 550 metric tons already in Iraq. In an effort to inquire about certain reports involving Niger, CIA's counter-proliferation experts, on their own initiative, asked an individual with ties to the region to make a visit to see what he could learn. He reported back to us that one of the former Nigerian officials he met stated that he was unaware of any contract being signed between Niger and rogue states for the sale of uranium during his tenure in office. The same former official also said that in June 1999 a businessman approached him and insisted that the former official meet with an Iraqi delegation to discuss "expanding commercial relations" between Iraq and Niger. The former official interpreted the overture as an attempt to discuss uranium sales. The former officials also offered details regarding Niger's processes for monitoring and transporting uranium that suggested it would be very unlikely that material could be illicitly diverted. There was no mention in the report of forged documents or any suggestion of the existence of documents at all.

Because this report, in our view, did not resolve whether Iraq was or was not seeking uranium from abroad, it was given a normal and wide distribution, but we did not brief it to the president, vice president or other senior administration officials. We also had to consider that the former Nigerian officials knew that what they were saying would reach the U.S. government and that this might have influenced what they said.

In the fall of 2002, my deputy and I briefed hundreds of members of Congress on Iraq. We did not brief the uranium acquisition story.

Also in the fall of 2002, our British colleagues told us they were planning to publish an unclassified dossier that mentioned reports of Iraqi attempts to obtain uranium in Africa. Because we viewed the reporting on such acquisition attempts to be inconclusive, we expressed reservations about its inclusion, but our colleagues said they were confident in their reports and left it in their document.

In September and October 2002 before Senate committees, senior intelligence officials in response to questions told members of Congress that we differed with the British dossier on the reliability of the uranium reporting.

In October, the Intelligence Community (IC) produced a classified, 90-page National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) on Iraq's WMD programs. There is a lengthy section in which most agencies of the intelligence community judged that Iraq was reconstituting its nuclear weapons program. Let me emphasize, the NIE's key judgments cited six reasons for this assessment; the African uranium issue was not one of them.

But in the interest of completeness, the report contained three paragraphs that discuss Iraq's significant 550-metric-ton uranium stockpile and how it could be diverted while under IAEA safeguard. These paragraphs also cited reports that Iraq began "vigorously trying to procure" more uranium from Niger and two other African countries, which would shorten the time Baghdad needed to produce nuclear weapons. The NIE states: "A foreign government service reported that as of early 2001, Niger planned to send several tons of pure 'uranium' (probably yellowcake) to Iraq. As of early 2001, Niger and Iraq reportedly were still working out the arrangements for this deal, which could be for up to 500 tons of yellowcake." The Estimate also states: "We do not know the status of this arrangement." With regard to reports that Iraq had sought uranium from two other countries, the Estimate says: "We cannot confirm whether Iraq succeeded in acquiring uranium ore and/or yellowcake from these sources." Much later in the NIE text, in presenting an alternate view on another matter, the State Department's Bureau of Intelligence and Research included a sentence that states: "Finally, the claims of Iraqi pursuit of natural uranium in Africa are, in INR's assessment, highly dubious."

An unclassified CIA white paper in October made no mention of the issue, again because it was not fundamental to the judgment that Iraq was reconstituting its nuclear weapons program, and because we had questions about some of the reporting. For the same reasons, the subject was not included in many public speeches, congressional testimony and the Secretary of State's United Nations presentation in early 2003.

The background above makes it even more troubling that the 16 words eventually made it into the State of the Union speech. This was a mistake.

Portions of the State of the Union speech draft came to the CIA for comment shortly before the speech was given. Various parts were shared with cognizant elements of the agency for review. Although the documents related to the alleged Niger-Iraqi uranium deal had not yet been determined to be forgeries, officials who were reviewing the draft remarks on uranium raised several concerns about the fragmentary nature of the intelligence with National Security Council colleagues. Some of the language was changed. From what we know now, agency officials in the end concurred that the text in the speech was factually correct, i.e. that the British government report said that Iraq sought uranium from Africa. This should not have been the test for clearing a presidential address. This did not rise to the level of certainty which should be required for presidential speeches, and CIA should have ensured that it was removed.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: africa; cia; georgetenet; iaea; iraq; iraqifreedom; niger; nigerflap; sotu; tenet; transcript; war; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

1 posted on 07/11/2003 4:34:11 PM PDT by Brian S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Brian S
The trap has been set.
2 posted on 07/11/2003 4:36:32 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
50,000 people go to a baseball game, but the game was rained out. A refund is then due. The team is about to mail refunds when the Congressional Democrats stopps them and decrees that they send out refund amounts based on the Democrat National Committee's interpretation of fairness. After all,if the refunds are made based on the price each person paid for the tickets, most of the money would go to the wealthiest ticket holders. That would be unconscionable!
Free Republic
Your donations keep us fighting liberals

3 posted on 07/11/2003 4:39:30 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
take the heat and keep your job
4 posted on 07/11/2003 4:42:30 PM PDT by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
Do you think that the Dems are being set up again? That is my sense of it all.

This Administration has been very good at maneuvering the Democrats into contradicting themselves. The Administration could come out in the future and claim that they did this because they were protecting sources. There are a lot of possiblilities.

Frankly, I do not think that the Bush team is that stupid. I love the way that they have toying with the Libs and the media over the last 2 years plus. It is sometimes fun to watch. It is more fun than Chess.
5 posted on 07/11/2003 4:51:44 PM PDT by Radix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
George John Tenet was sworn in as Director of Central Intelligence on 11 July 1997 following a unanimous vote by both the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and the full Senate. In this position he heads the Intelligence Community (all foreign intelligence agencies of the United States) and directs the Central Intelligence Agency.

Mr. Tenet served as the Deputy Director of Central Intelligence, having been confirmed in that position in July 1995. Following the departure of John Deutch in December 1996, he served as Acting Director.

Mr. Tenet previously served as Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director for Intelligence Programs at the National Security Council. While at the NSC, he coordinated Presidential Decision Directives on ''Intelligence Priorities,'' ''Security Policy Coordination,'' ''US Counterintelligence Effectiveness,'' and ''US Policy on Remote Sensing Space Capabilities.'' He also was responsible for coordinating all interagency activities concerning covert action.

Prior to serving at the National Security Council, he served on President Clinton's national security transition team.
6 posted on 07/11/2003 4:54:30 PM PDT by hoosiermama (Prayers for all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
The administration needs to harp on the fact that Tony Blair stands by British intel claims that Iraq was trying to obtain nuclear material from Niger. The media RATS are refusing to report this because then their little whipped up story would be a non-story and would be DOA.

I don't see what Tenant needs to take the fall for. No one has proved beyond a reasonable doubt that Iraq wasn't trying to obtain material from Niger. And isn't this the standard in the mainstream press re: Iraq - everything needs to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt? Tony Blair says he had other intel besides the "forged" documents which he based his claims on.

7 posted on 07/11/2003 4:58:18 PM PDT by ejdrapes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: georgwbush_myself
Back to DU...moron.
9 posted on 07/11/2003 5:10:35 PM PDT by Airborne Longhorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: georgwbush_myself
What is laughable is the idiots on the left lose everytime. This whole thing was made up by the DNC and that scumbag Terry McAuliffe
10 posted on 07/11/2003 5:12:11 PM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Airborne Longhorn; Admin Moderator
WOW, THAT WAS FAST
11 posted on 07/11/2003 5:13:05 PM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Brian S

CIA Director George Tenet

12 posted on 07/11/2003 5:13:20 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: MJY1288
  

Brian Wilson on FoxNews just reported that down on the street Terry McCauliffe drove by shouting to him out of his car,
"I'm telling you, Bush is gone."  Wilson could barely contain his laughter.

14 posted on 07/11/2003 5:14:00 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
That took place about an hour ago according to Wilson.
15 posted on 07/11/2003 5:14:40 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
LOL, is that for real?
16 posted on 07/11/2003 5:15:04 PM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: georgwbush_myself
banned, huh. Let me try to educate you about Free Republic if you happen to be lurking. The purpose of FR is to allow for intellectual discourse of issues based on facts and analysis. So get lost unless you have something useful to contribute to the site.
17 posted on 07/11/2003 5:16:54 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Terry has to learn to stay on his medications. They don't do any good otherwise.
18 posted on 07/11/2003 5:18:04 PM PDT by NewRomeTacitus (Democrats are generous people...with your earnings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
What..... Are you a mind reader :-)
19 posted on 07/11/2003 5:18:36 PM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
Yep. McAuliffe had just taken part in a panel on FoxNews. His demeanor was very subdued, while he presented his views. They were still out there, but he was doing his best to keep himself in check. Then he went outside and couldn't contain himself any longer. What a hoot.
20 posted on 07/11/2003 5:19:10 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson