Skip to comments.
The Bible and Your Taxes (Alabama governor to increase income taxes based on Scriptures) BARF ALERT!
about.com ^
| 7/10/03
| Charles Henderson
Posted on 07/10/2003 9:59:18 AM PDT by ppaul
Here's a Twist on Faith Based InitiativesHere's a twist. The conservative Republican Governor of Alabama, Bob Riley has moved the discussion of faith based initiatives to a whole new level with his bold proposal to INCREASE state taxes by a whopping total of $1.2 billion, the largest in history. Please continue reading below...
For a Republican Governor this is surprising enough, but there's more. Riley is using the Bible as a source book for his decision. In a press release announcing his decision, Riley explained: "Alabamians are a faithful people who believe that creating a better world for our children and helping our neighbors are both sacred duties." In a follow-up interview with The Birmingham News, he said: "Jesus says one of our missions is to take care of the least among us. We've got to take care of the poor."
Like many other states, Alabama is facing large budget deficits, and it has one of the most regressive tax systems, with a large portion of the tax burden falling upon those least able to afford it. While in some states families living at or near the poverty level are exempted from state taxes, not so in Alabama. Even those earning less than $5,000 a year pay state income tax, and the working poor pay a larger percentage of their modest incomes in state and local taxes than those at higher income levels. Governor Riley proposes to shift much of the tax burden to those on the upper rungs of the income ladder. He also plans to increase taxes on corporations.
The Governor is not coming out of "left field" with these proposals, rather he is basing his tax policy on solid research into biblical law, theology and Judeo-Christian ethics. That research was carried out by Susan Pace Hamil who teaches at the University of Alabama Law School and was published in the Alabama Law Journal.
It will be fascinating to see how the Governor's initiatives play out in Alabama, a conservative state long thought to be part of the so-called Bible belt. Can Biblical authority be brought to bare upon popular opinion in a way that turns the agenda of the religious right upon itself? Can Christianity once again become a force moving on behalf of political initiatives that are thought to be progressive, or even, dare one say, "liberal?" If this proves to be the case, it will make discussion about faith based initiatives and church-state relations a lot more interesting.
In recent years it has been the unquestioned assumption of many that conservative Christianity and conservative politics are inextricably bound together in a way that makes the word "Christianity" practically synonymous with right wing politics. This has not always been the case in American history. Rather Christianity has often been a force for progressive social reform. Evangelical Christians in significant numbers were part of the civil rights movement in the second half of the twentieth century and before that Christians took the lead in the passage of child labor laws, women suffrage, and the abolitionist movement.
This is the third time in recent months that I have noticed a new dynamism on the part of Evangelical Christians who are challenging the assumption that they can be counted to fall lock step behind political leaders on the right simply because they invoke the name of God. Prior articles have commented upon the surprising presence of Christian activists in the environmental movement as well as in the continuing resistance to US policy in Iraq and the Middle East. Should such trends continue, it may turn out that we are in the early stages of a major realignment of political life in America.
TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; US: Alabama
KEYWORDS: alabama; bible; bobriley; dixie; heartofdixie; incometax; incometaxes; riley; scripture; scriptures; socialism; socialist; tax; taxation; taxes; thesouth; welfare; welfarestate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
1
posted on
07/10/2003 9:59:18 AM PDT
by
ppaul
To: ppaul
"Alabamians are a faithful people "
Yes, but not STUPID!
2
posted on
07/10/2003 10:04:04 AM PDT
by
CCCV
To: ppaul
a faithful people who believe that creating a better world for our children and helping our neighbors are both sacred duties.Wow. Do they also believe they are called upon to impose their version of charity on the rest of society?
This guy is dangerous. As are the people who follow him.
3
posted on
07/10/2003 10:04:06 AM PDT
by
RJCogburn
("His lower lip? What was you aiming at?".......Emmitt Quincy)
To: All
| A Recall AND a Fundraiser? I'm toast. |
 |
| Let's get this over with FAST. Please contribute! |
4
posted on
07/10/2003 10:05:47 AM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: RJCogburn
I voted for Riley. He is/was extremely popular with the GOP voters in Alabama, as evidenced by his thrashing of Lt. Gov. Steve Windom in the primary last year (Riley took 73% to Windom's 18%). However, there was no discussion of this tax plan then. The plan will be put to statewide referendum this fall, as I understand it.
5
posted on
07/10/2003 10:07:02 AM PDT
by
TheBigB
To: ppaul
Methinks the Governor needs some help with his interpretation, because nowhere in my Bible does it say for Christians to take care of the least among us by allowing a government entity to confiscate the fruit of our labor and squander it on never-ending layers of administration, or otherwise lining the pockets of political cronies. I will help any person who is willing to help him or herself, but I do not need a government that dips further into my pockets, and decides how better to appropriate my money. I think maybe I'll look into the Alabama state budget and see if I can find some of the Christian programs my extra tax dollars will support.
To: RJCogburn
IIRC, Jesus specificaly avoided speaking to governments about their role. His commandment to take care of the poor was to INDIVIDUALS.
7
posted on
07/10/2003 10:09:50 AM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: Michael2001; AnnaZ; P-Marlowe; RaceBannon; yendu bwam; JMJ333; Dimensio; Bryan; George W. Bush; ...
ping.
8
posted on
07/10/2003 10:17:15 AM PDT
by
ppaul
To: ppaul
He cites examples of "evangelicals" involved in acts of freeing people from oppression
not enslaving them to govt.
Jesus also bid people come to him of their own free volition
He did not force himself on anyone....and He Is God
Dont pay these absurd taxes and you will feel the wt. of govt. oppression...and not the freedom of Christ
This is more demonic than Christian imo
9
posted on
07/10/2003 10:17:50 AM PDT
by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
To: ppaul
Jesus wants you to pay more taxes?
10
posted on
07/10/2003 10:17:59 AM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: ppaul
INTREP
To: ppaul
I would hope at the next primary this guy will find Jesus & troll around with Jimmy Swaggert.
12
posted on
07/10/2003 10:24:03 AM PDT
by
Digger
To: Sir Gawain; blam; southland; Flurry; mr_freedom_usa; garybob; lyby; American Blood; ...
ping.
13
posted on
07/10/2003 10:26:52 AM PDT
by
ppaul
To: joesnuffy
This is more demonic than Christian imoAmen.
14
posted on
07/10/2003 10:27:58 AM PDT
by
ppaul
To: ppaul
Here's an idea. Let's contact the ACLU and see if we can get them to fight any tax increase on the basis that the tax increase was implemented for Judeo-Christian religious purposes.
To: cincinnati65
Higher Taxes = a breach in the "wall of separation...", eh?
16
posted on
07/10/2003 10:36:17 AM PDT
by
ppaul
To: cincinnati65
You wrote what I was thinking. Spot on.
17
posted on
07/10/2003 10:39:01 AM PDT
by
TankerKC
(Take the time it takes, so it takes less time.)
To: Dog Gone
Jesus wants you to pay more taxes? WWJC?
What Would Jesus Charge?
18
posted on
07/10/2003 10:41:04 AM PDT
by
TankerKC
(Take the time it takes, so it takes less time.)
To: ppaul
Tell us therefore, What thinkest thou? Is it lawful to give tribute unto Caesar, or not? But Jesus perceived their wickedness, and said, Why tempt ye me, ye hypocrites? Shew me the tribute money. And they brought unto him a penny. And he saith unto them, Whose is this image and superscription? They say unto him, Caesar's. Then saith he unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's.
Matthew 22:17-21
19
posted on
07/10/2003 10:47:53 AM PDT
by
w_over_w
(More Ovaltine please!)
To: w_over_w
Caesar's image is not on our money.
But, "God" is.
20
posted on
07/10/2003 10:52:39 AM PDT
by
ppaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson