Skip to comments.
Pro-life women shift to majority
The Washington Times ^
| July 2, 2003
| Grant Schulte
Posted on 07/02/2003 2:45:59 PM PDT by sitetest
Edited on 07/12/2004 4:04:49 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
The balance between pro-choice women and women who say abortion should be outlawed or severely restricted is shifting toward the pro-life side, bumping that group into the majority in the debate over reproductive rights, according to a new national poll.
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; abortionlist; polls; prolife; women
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
To: YaYa123
Dear YaYa123,
Sure it's huge. Whatever Faye has to say, it doesn't really matter.
There was a great graph in the written version of the article in the Washington Times. It showed that:
- 30% of women favor the current legal regime of essentially abortion on demand;
- 17% of women favor a complete ban on abortion;
- 34% favor a ban with the exceptions of rape, incest, and life of the mother.
That's where you get your 51%.
But, another 17% favor laws more restrictive than they are now, though not quite a nearly-complete ban.
Thus, 68% of women favor abortion laws more restrictive than they are now.
Not huge?
sitetest
21
posted on
07/02/2003 4:01:59 PM PDT
by
sitetest
To: backhoe
Have a couple of ultrasound pictures of a grandson due this month!
22
posted on
07/02/2003 4:09:40 PM PDT
by
SwinneySwitch
(Freedom is not Free - Support the Troops!)
To: wideawake; Mike Fieschko; Romulus; eastsider; Rum Tum Tugger; ChicagoGirl; Claud
* ping *
23
posted on
07/02/2003 4:15:26 PM PDT
by
sitetest
To: SwinneySwitch
Have a couple of ultrasound pictures of a grandson due this month! My kind regards to you and the baby.
24
posted on
07/02/2003 4:34:08 PM PDT
by
backhoe
(They "borrowed" my title...)
To: sitetest
I know what you mean, and I'm thrilled with the results, (which were done by Princeton poll, I think), so Waddleton couldn't deny them. But look where this gets serious coverage, The Washington Times.
When Tim Russert, Chris Mathews, the NYTIMES, Newsweek and Time admit and and cover significantly, that American women are predominantly pro-life, sadly, I don't consider it "huge".
25
posted on
07/02/2003 5:24:17 PM PDT
by
YaYa123
To: votelife
I agree. However, I note that ALL the Justices at the time of Roe v. Wade were men. It would be fitting if a woman Justice were to be among the ones who give women their rights back.
26
posted on
07/02/2003 5:26:36 PM PDT
by
Lorianne
To: sitetest
Let's hope this is accurate, and then translates into pro-life elections with added momentum!
27
posted on
07/02/2003 5:27:16 PM PDT
by
cpforlife.org
(Abortion? The spirit in the schools of one generation, is the spirit in the Government of the next.)
To: sitetest
28
posted on
07/02/2003 5:28:53 PM PDT
by
Southack
(Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: YaYa123
Exactly. They pull the victime routine. Of course when it comes to waiting periods and pre-abortion counseling, the tune is that women are smart enough to make their own decisions and have already thought things through thoroughly before seeking an abortion.
29
posted on
07/02/2003 5:29:18 PM PDT
by
Lorianne
To: jwalsh07
Ping
30
posted on
07/02/2003 5:29:30 PM PDT
by
deadhead
(God Bless Our Troops and Veterans)
To: sitetest; MHGinTN; Coleus; nickcarraway; Mr. Silverback; Canticle_of_Deborah; ...
Please let me know if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.
31
posted on
07/02/2003 5:37:11 PM PDT
by
cpforlife.org
(Abortion? The spirit in the schools of one generation, is the spirit in the Government of the next.)
To: Cicero
You're right. I'd love to see a Republican candidate such as President Bush turn to his Demo-Rat rival in debate and say, "I think American women are too good for abortion, don't you?"
32
posted on
07/02/2003 5:44:46 PM PDT
by
puroresu
To: Cicero
Actually, GWB has been pretty good on this issue. But there are the OTHER Republicans...
33
posted on
07/02/2003 5:45:28 PM PDT
by
ninenot
(Joe McCarthy was RIGHT, but Drank Too Much)
To: YaYa123
Limbaugh played this up today, but I hadn't heard the source. This must make Wattleton puke.
34
posted on
07/02/2003 5:47:54 PM PDT
by
ninenot
(Joe McCarthy was RIGHT, but Drank Too Much)
To: sitetest; deadhead
Thus, 68% of women favor abortion laws more restrictive than they are now.Excellent!
35
posted on
07/02/2003 5:55:01 PM PDT
by
jwalsh07
To: cpforlife.org
Great news!
To: sitetest; cpforlife.org
Great News! Now watch the tides of politics slowly move over to our side since it's all about votes and keeping their jobs. Once the poll is over the apex of 50% and they see that more Americans are turing pro life, they too, will slowly change.
37
posted on
07/02/2003 6:14:23 PM PDT
by
Coleus
(God is Pro Life and Straight and gave an innate predisposition for self-preservation and protection)
To: sitetest; 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; ...
`
38
posted on
07/02/2003 6:18:08 PM PDT
by
Coleus
(God is Pro Life and Straight and gave an innate predisposition for self-preservation and protection)
To: ninenot
"Limbaugh played this up today" Now that IS good news!
39
posted on
07/02/2003 6:23:32 PM PDT
by
YaYa123
To: y2k_free_radical
bump and God bless! :-)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson