Skip to comments.
Gays Overjoyed, Conservatives Despair Over Sodomy Ruling (Mega-barf ALERT)
Associated Press ^
| 06-26-03
Posted on 06/26/2003 5:44:54 PM PDT by Brian S
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:42:50 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
In a gesture of gratitude for the Supreme Court's decision Thursday striking down a Texas anti-sodomy law, gay-rights activists lowered the huge rainbow flag that always flies over the city's Castro District and hoisted the Stars and Stripes in its place.
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: activistcourt; activistsupremecourt; cutlurewar; downourthroats; druglaws; homosexualagenda; incestlaws; lawrencevtexas; notconsentingadults; privacylaws; prostitutionlaws; samesexdisorder; sodomylaws
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-116 next last
1
posted on
06/26/2003 5:44:55 PM PDT
by
Brian S
Comment #2 Removed by Moderator
To: Brian S
But Ruth Harlow, who argued the case before the Supreme Court as legal director of Lambda Legal, said the court was merely "catching up" with public opinion. It is not the court's job to catch up with public opinion. That is the job of the legislature. If public opinion in Texas support this, the law would not have existed. This is unbelievably flawed reasoning. Sadly, 6 members of the Supremes agreed.
The only thing the sodomy gang and conservatives agree on is that this ruling is a huge and far-reaching win for them.
3
posted on
06/26/2003 5:49:36 PM PDT
by
RAT Patrol
(Congress can give one American a dollar only by first taking it away from another American. -W.W.)
To: Brian S
Looks like another AIDS crisis is on it's way...
To: Brian S
Sad!:^{
5
posted on
06/26/2003 5:50:22 PM PDT
by
SwinneySwitch
(Freedom is not Free - Support the Troops!)
To: Brian S
Is this "Sodomy Select" since it was brought to us by that same biased court that "selected" GW Bush as President? I thought liberals didn't have any respect for the Supreme court!!!
6
posted on
06/26/2003 5:51:59 PM PDT
by
ladyinred
(The left have blood on their hands.)
To: RAT Patrol
I highly doubt this is "public opinion" across most of the country! In fact, I am positive it is not! What lies.
7
posted on
06/26/2003 5:53:17 PM PDT
by
ladyinred
(The left have blood on their hands.)
To: Brian S
I don't care what they do in their own homes, and I fail to see why the government should either. The only possible issue is that gays have this doubletalk about HIV and AIDS: they say it isn't a gay disease, yet the say that Bush is trying to kill them by not providing as much funding for the search for cures as they would like. As long as the amount of funding for HIV and AIDS doesn't get overblown (i.e. it should remain in proportion the the amount of Americans that have it - these guys also pay taxes, so they should get something for their money), it's none of my business.
8
posted on
06/26/2003 5:57:14 PM PDT
by
psychoknk
To: Brian S
Georgians later repealed that law . . . Wrong. Our state Supreme Court threw it out. That court was given to us by the Democratic governors whose line just ended here with the last election.
9
posted on
06/26/2003 5:57:34 PM PDT
by
madprof98
To: Brian S
In a gesture of gratitude for the Supreme Court's decision Thursday striking down a Texas anti-sodomy law, gay-rights activists lowered the huge rainbow flag that always flies over the city's Castro District and hoisted the Stars and Stripes in its place. Wonder if it's legal to burn a rainbow flag?
10
posted on
06/26/2003 5:58:18 PM PDT
by
DaBroasta
(GRID will eventually cure homosexuality)
Comment #11 Removed by Moderator
To: psychoknk
As long as the amount of funding for HIV and AIDS doesn't get overblown (i.e. it should remain in proportion the the amount of Americans that have it - these guys also pay taxes, so they should get something for their money), it's none of my business. Too late, it already gets 20 times what cancer research is getting.
12
posted on
06/26/2003 5:59:39 PM PDT
by
aimhigh
To: caisson71
Conservatives shouldn't despair. They
should just buy another box of ammo.
Why buy ammo? What do you expect to happen?
13
posted on
06/26/2003 6:01:02 PM PDT
by
gcruse
(There is no such thing as society: there are individual men and women[.] --Margaret Thatcher)
To: Brian S
Gay advocacy groups from Alaska to Florida planned to celebrate into the night.Deviant sex alert.
To: Brian S; RJayneJ
"The high court's 6-3 decision overturned not only the Texas statute but apparently swept away laws in a dozen other states that ban oral and anal sex for everyone, or for homosexuals in particular."Per the title for this thread, *why* should Conservatives despair?
The Supreme Court just ruled that *government* doesn't have the Constitutional authority to ban, tax, or regulate certain activities inside our private bedrooms.
Isn't that what Conservatives want: more restrictions on *government* authority?
Frankly, leftists can cheer and conservatives can jeer or despair, but I'd call this ruling a stealth victory for reigning in the power and scope of the federal government.
The precedent set in this case could *easily* be applied to a number of other areas in which government should be prohibited from regulating.
How can the government justify regulating my love of guns in my bedroom now, for instance?!
15
posted on
06/26/2003 6:02:22 PM PDT
by
Southack
(Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: psychoknk
As long as the amount of funding for HIV and AIDS doesn't get overblown (i.e. it should remain in proportion the the amount of Americans that have it - these guys also pay taxes, so they should get something for their money), it's none of my business.AIDS funding is already overblown. More money goes to AIDS research and treatment than 11 other diseases that kill more Americans than AIDS every year.
16
posted on
06/26/2003 6:02:28 PM PDT
by
DaBroasta
(GRID will eventually cure homosexuality)
To: Brian S
Another win for the patron cause of liberalism: sodomy!
To: Brian S
I wonder how many freaks will celibrate my taking it up the a** tonight !
18
posted on
06/26/2003 6:04:33 PM PDT
by
Newbomb Turk
(Live from the ladies room here at Tubbys DriveIn.)
To: DaBroasta
Wonder if it's legal to burn a rainbow flag?
That would be a HATE CRIME.
ANY disagreement with the Cult Of The Anus is considered a HATE CRIME. After all, they are a protected class with SPECIAL RIGHTS.
19
posted on
06/26/2003 6:05:51 PM PDT
by
pyx
To: Southack
How can the government justify regulating my love of guns in my bedroom now, for instance?! I still think it should be illegal to have kinky sex with your guns... :)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-116 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson