Skip to comments.
Media Ignore Gephardt's Vow to Overthrow the Supreme Court
NewsMax.com ^
| 6/24/03
| With Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff
Posted on 06/24/2003 4:11:18 PM PDT by Jean S
The leftist media establishment has shown a stunning lack of interest in Rep. Dick Gephardt's bizarre threat to vanquish the Supreme Court.
As we noted Monday in our article on the Supreme Court's rulings on racial quotas, Gephardt said Sunday, "When [sic] I'm president, we'll do executive orders to overcome any wrong thing the Supreme Court does tomorrow or any other day."
Imagine the nationwide media uproar if candidate George W. Bush had said such a thing. But Gephardt was pandering to Jesse Jackson, so any crazy promise seems to be OK in the eyes of the pro-Democrat media.
A few people outside the media mainstream did take notice. Andrew Sullivan wrote today: "Does Gephardt understand even the basics of constitutional law? Or does he think his audience is too craven to notice an obvious piece of nonsense."
Rush Limbaugh pointed out the wacko pledge in an item on his Web site headlined "Nine Democrat Losers Meet to Race-Bait."
But headlines in the daily papers have been hilariously bland and unrevealing. "Democratic presidential hopefuls tackle issues of interest to blacks," according to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. "Democratic hopefuls get together at forum," quoth the Richmond Times-Dispatch. Headlines in the Baltimore Sun, Cleveland Plain Dealer, Detroit News and others merely claimed that Gephardt and company were backing so-called "affirmative action," i.e., discrimination against those of European or Asian descent.
Will these media think it is an "affirmative action" if by some miracle Dick is elected president and manages to "overcome" the judicial branch of government?
NewsMax has called Gephardt's handlers for comment. Stay tuned.
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; gephardt; mediabias
1
posted on
06/24/2003 4:11:18 PM PDT
by
Jean S
To: JeanS
So rule by the RAT means the rules only apply to you? Nothing new here, just move along.
2
posted on
06/24/2003 4:19:11 PM PDT
by
Nateman
(Socialism first, cancer second.)
To: JeanS
Hello--anybody out there?
Does anyone care about the Constitution of the United States?
We know the dims don't but what about the rest of you?
Can you say Dem dictatorship?
To: ErinsDaddy
4
posted on
06/24/2003 5:41:35 PM PDT
by
Jean S
Comment #5 Removed by Moderator
To: ErinsDaddy
Absolutely, I care about the constitution of the United States. This guy is an idiot and he was doing some major a$$ kissing when he said it.....I am just going to sit back and watch Dick(less) bury himself. LOL
6
posted on
06/24/2003 5:47:19 PM PDT
by
Arpege92
To: JeanS
I write a topical comedy service for radio DJs, and I considered using that quote yesterday and ridiculing it. I ended up not using it, not because I wanted to cover up for Gephardt, but just because I consider him to be so unimportant, he's not even worth making fun of. I certainly wouldn't have dropped my story about the orgasmic cow from Germany to make room for a Dick Gephardt quote. Not only was the cow more interesting, she also has a better chance of getting elected president, and she's not even an American citizen.
7
posted on
06/24/2003 5:50:34 PM PDT
by
HHFi
To: JeanS; All
CAN ANYBODY SPELL D E S P E R A T E ...??
8
posted on
06/24/2003 10:59:35 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
To: Centurion2000
9
posted on
06/24/2003 11:09:23 PM PDT
by
exDemMom
(W in 04)
To: HHFi
about the orgasmic cow from Germany Gosh, how did I miss that one?
10
posted on
06/24/2003 11:11:19 PM PDT
by
exDemMom
(W in 04)
To: JeanS
If the radio talk shows flog this enough it will start to get picked up. It even took a few days for the Trent Lott controversy to get legs. And eventually the other Dems won't mind bringing it up.
11
posted on
06/24/2003 11:19:05 PM PDT
by
MattAMiller
(Down with the Mullahs! Peace, freedom, and prosperity for Iran.)
To: ErinsDaddy
Does anyone care about the Constitution of the United States?
Nope, neither party. However, since the Democrats care less,
I should vote enthusiastically Republican. Or so I'm told.
To: exDemMom
weight of a bullet.
To: exDemMom; Centurion2000; Admin Moderator; Jim Robinson
168 grains refers to lead as in a bullet. I would consider that post to be an implied threat and a secret service agent reading this thread would be paying a visit to centurion's home to cnfiscate his arms and commit him to a mental institution.
14
posted on
06/24/2003 11:34:50 PM PDT
by
Cacique
To: Cacique
168 grains refers to lead as in a bullet. Ever weighed a voter's card ?
15
posted on
06/25/2003 5:19:14 AM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(We are crushing our enemies, seeing him driven before us and hearing the lamentations of the liberal)
To: JeanS
The closer we get to the election, the more outrageous the media is going to become. You can already hear it coming.
To: ErinsDaddy
NEVERMIND
He said "overcome" not "overturn".
To: JeanS
So Dick wants to be King, eh?
Perhaps he should be Czar.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson